definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.

This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.

Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.

llvm-svn: 206844

 lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp         |   18 ------------------
 lib/Analysis/RegionPass.cpp             |    1 -
 lib/Analysis/TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp |    1 -
 lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp  |   21 ---------------------
 lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp          |    2 --
 lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp   |    6 ------
 utils/TableGen/AsmWriterEmitter.cpp     |   13 -------------
 utils/TableGen/DFAPacketizerEmitter.cpp |    7 -------
 utils/TableGen/IntrinsicEmitter.cpp     |    2 --
 9 files changed, 71 deletions(-)

llvm-svn: 206506

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
   detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
   iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
   Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
   they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
   needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
   opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364

llvm-svn: 202953

hardcoded to use IR BasicBlocks.

llvm-svn: 202835

The crux of the issue is that LCSSA doesn't preserve stateful alias
analyses. Before r200067, LICM didn't cause LCSSA to run in the LTO pass
manager, where LICM runs essentially without any of the other loop
passes. As a consequence the globalmodref-aa pass run before that loop
pass manager was able to survive the loop pass manager and be used by
DSE to eliminate stores in the function called from the loop body in
Adobe-C++/loop_unroll (and similar patterns in other benchmarks).

When LICM was taught to preserve LCSSA it had to require it as well.
This caused it to be run in the loop pass manager and because it did not
preserve AA, the stateful AA was lost. Most of LLVM's AA isn't stateful
and so this didn't manifest in most cases. Also, in most cases LCSSA was
already running, and so there was no interesting change.

The real kicker is that LCSSA by its definition (injecting PHI nodes
only) trivially preserves AA! All we need to do is mark it, and then
everything goes back to working as intended. It probably was blocking
some other weird cases of stateful AA but the only one I have is
a 1000-line IR test case from loop_unroll, so I don't really have a good
test case here.

Hopefully this fixes the regressions on performance that have been seen
since that revision.

llvm-svn: 201104

LCSSA from it caused a crasher with the LoopUnroll pass.

This crasher is really nasty. We destroy LCSSA form in a suprising way.
When unrolling a loop into an outer loop, we not only need to restore
LCSSA form for the outer loop, but for all children of the outer loop.
This is somewhat obvious in retrospect, but hey!

While this seems pretty heavy-handed, it's not that bad. Fundamentally,
we only do this when we unroll a loop, which is already a heavyweight
operation. We're unrolling all of these hypothetical inner loops as
well, so their size and complexity is already on the critical path. This
is just adding another pass over them to re-canonicalize.

I have a test case from PR18616 that is great for reproducing this, but
pretty useless to check in as it relies on many 10s of nested empty
loops that get unrolled and deleted in just the right order. =/ What's
worse is that investigating this has exposed another source of failure
that is likely to be even harder to test. I'll try to come up with test
cases for these fixes, but I want to get the fixes into the tree first
as they're causing crashes in the wild.

llvm-svn: 200273

the loops in a function, and teach LICM to work in the presance of
LCSSA.

Previously, LCSSA was a loop pass. That made passes requiring it also be
loop passes and unable to depend on function analysis passes easily. It
also caused outer loops to have a different "canonical" form from inner
loops during analysis. Instead, we go into LCSSA form and preserve it
through the loop pass manager run.

Note that this has the same problem as LoopSimplify that prevents
enabling its verification -- loop passes which run at the end of the loop
pass manager and don't preserve these are valid, but the subsequent loop
pass runs of outer loops that do preserve this pass trigger too much
verification and fail because the inner loop no longer verifies.

The other problem this exposed is that LICM was completely unable to
handle LCSSA form. It didn't preserve it and it actually would give up
on moving instructions in many cases when they were used by an LCSSA phi
node. I've taught LICM to support detecting LCSSA-form PHI nodes and to
hoist and sink around them. This may actually let LICM fire
significantly more because we put everything into LCSSA form to rotate
the loop before running LICM. =/ Now LICM should handle that fine and
preserve it correctly. The down side is that LICM has to require LCSSA
in order to preserve it. This is just a fact of life for LCSSA. It's
entirely possible we should completely remove LCSSA from the optimizer.

The test updates are essentially accomodating LCSSA phi nodes in the
output of LICM, and the fact that we now completely sink every
instruction in ashr-crash below the loop bodies prior to unrolling.

With this change, LCSSA is computed only three times in the pass
pipeline. One of them could be removed (and potentially a SCEV run and
a separate LoopPassManager entirely!) if we had a LoopPass variant of
InstCombine that ran InstCombine on the loop body but refused to combine
away LCSSA PHI nodes. Currently, this also prevents loop unrolling from
being in the same loop pass manager is rotate, LICM, and unswitch.

There is one thing that I *really* don't like -- preserving LCSSA in
LICM is quite expensive. We end up having to re-run LCSSA twice for some
loops after LICM runs because LICM can undo LCSSA both in the current
loop and the parent loop. I don't really see good solutions to this
other than to completely move away from LCSSA and using tools like
SSAUpdater instead.

llvm-svn: 200067

can be used by both the new pass manager and the old.

This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and
lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn,
tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very
straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface.

The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of
this split should match the split between CallGraph and
CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been
updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The
goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather
than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass
manager significantly easier.

Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from
re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to
directly recomputing the domtree.

llvm-svn: 199104

directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.

Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.

But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.

llvm-svn: 199082

This patch implements quick look-up for block in loop by maintaining a hash set for blocks.
It improves the efficiency of loop analysis a lot, the biggest improvement could be 5-6%(458.sjeng).
Below are the compilation time for our benchmark in llc before & after the patch.

Benchmark	llc - trunk		llc - patched	
401.bzip2	0.339081	100.00%	0.329657	102.86%
403.gcc		19.853966	100.00%	19.605466	101.27%
429.mcf		0.049823	100.00%	0.048451	102.83%
433.milc	0.514898	100.00%	0.510217	100.92%
444.namd	1.109328	100.00%	1.103481	100.53%
445.gobmk	4.988028	100.00%	4.929114	101.20%
456.hmmer	0.843871	100.00%	0.825865	102.18%
458.sjeng	0.754238	100.00%	0.714095	105.62%
464.h264ref	2.9668		100.00%	2.90612		102.09%
471.omnetpp	4.556533	100.00%	4.511886	100.99%
bitmnp01	0.038168	100.00%	0.0357		106.91%
idctrn01	0.037745	100.00%	0.037332	101.11%
libquake2	3.78689		100.00%	3.76209		100.66%
libquake_	2.251525	100.00%	2.234104	100.78%
linpack		0.033159	100.00%	0.032788	101.13%
matrix01	0.045319	100.00%	0.043497	104.19%
nbench		0.333161	100.00%	0.329799	101.02%
tblook01	0.017863	100.00%	0.017666	101.12%
ttsprk01	0.054337	100.00%	0.053057	102.41%

Reviewer	: Andrew Trick <atrick@apple.com>, Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>
Approver	: Andrew Trick <atrick@apple.com>
Test		: Pass make check-all & llvm test-suite

llvm-svn: 193460

into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.

Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]

llvm-svn: 169131

- Use value handle tricks to communicate use replacements instead of forgetLoop, this is a lot faster.
- Move the "big hammer" out of the main loop so it's not called for every instruction.

This should recover most (if not all) compile time regressions introduced by this code.

llvm-svn: 167136

I'm not entirely happy with this solution, but I don't see a smarter way currently.
Fixes PR14214.

llvm-svn: 167112

The LoopSimplify bug is pretty harmless because the loop goes from unanalyzable
to analyzable but the LCSSA bug is very nasty. It only comes into play with a
specific order of the LoopPassManager worklist and can cause actual
miscompilations, when a SCEV refers to a value that has been replaced with PHI
node. SCEVExpander may then insert code into the wrong place, either violating
domination or randomly miscompiling stuff.

Comes with an extensive test case reduced from the test-suite with
bugpoint+SCEVValidator.

llvm-svn: 166787

llvm-svn: 131427

llvm-svn: 130894

PHINode::Create() giving the (known or expected) number of operands.

llvm-svn: 128537

llvm-svn: 127684

llvm-svn: 127674

so that Dominators.h is *just* domtree.  Also prune #includes a bit.

llvm-svn: 122714

they do not also require them.  This allows us to reduce inter-pass linkage
dependencies.

llvm-svn: 116854

Get rid of static constructors for pass registration.  Instead, every pass exposes an initializeMyPassFunction(), which
must be called in the pass's constructor.  This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.

Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes.  Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.

I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin.  It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options.  If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.

llvm-svn: 116820

perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client.  For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve.  I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.

llvm-svn: 116334

llvm-svn: 115996

I'm sure it is harmless.  Original commit message:
If PrototypeValue is erased in the middle of using the SSAUpdator
then the SSAUpdator may access freed memory.  Instead, simply pass
in the type and name explicitly, which is all that was used anyway.

llvm-svn: 112810

self host errors on clang-x86-64.

llvm-svn: 112719

then the SSAUpdator may access freed memory.  Instead, simply pass
in the type and name explicitly, which is all that was used anyway.

llvm-svn: 112699

Now that PassInfo and Pass::ID have been separated, move the rest of the passes over to the new registration API.

llvm-svn: 111815

llvm-svn: 110460

llvm-svn: 110410

ID member as the sole unique type identifier.  Clean up APIs related to this change.

llvm-svn: 110396

dependence on DominanceFrontier. Instead, add an explicit DominanceFrontier
pass in StandardPasses.h to ensure that it gets scheduled at the right
time.

Declare that loop unrolling preserves ScalarEvolution, and shuffle some
getAnalysisUsages.

This eliminates one LoopSimplify and one LCCSA run in the standard
compile opts sequence.

llvm-svn: 109413

a redundant loopsimplify run from the default -O2 sequence.

llvm-svn: 108539

llvm-svn: 107968

compute a set of reachable blocks for itself each time it is called, which
is fairly frequently.

llvm-svn: 98179

llvm-svn: 86575

the loop. This is needed because with indirectbr it may not be possible
for LoopSimplify to guarantee that all loop exit predecessors are
inside the loop. This fixes PR5437.

LCCSA no longer actually requires LoopSimplify form, but for now it
must still have the dependency because the PassManager doesn't know
how to schedule LoopSimplify otherwise.

llvm-svn: 86569

llvm-svn: 86160