- Dec 13, 2012
-
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
llvm-svn: 170057
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
FFR2P_M. llvm-svn: 170055
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
llvm-svn: 170054
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
FFR1_W_M and FFR1P_M. The new instruction definitions have one-to-one correspondence with the instructions in the ISA manual. llvm-svn: 170053
-
Eli Bendersky authored
llvm-svn: 170052
-
- Dec 12, 2012
-
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
llvm-svn: 170012
-
Bill Schmidt authored
PowerPC target. This is the last of the four models, so we now have full TLS support. This is mostly a straightforward extension of the general dynamic model. I had to use an additional Chain operand to tie ADDIS_DTPREL_HA to the register copy following ADDI_TLSLD_L; otherwise everything above the ADDIS_DTPREL_HA appeared dead and was removed. As before, there are new test cases to test the assembly generation, and the relocations output during integrated assembly. The expected code gen sequence can be read in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/tls-ld.ll. There are a couple of things I think can be done more efficiently in the overall TLS code, so there will likely be a clean-up patch forthcoming; but for now I want to be sure the functionality is in place. Bill llvm-svn: 170003
-
Logan Chien authored
Add R_ARM_NONE and R_ARM_PREL31 relocation types to MCExpr. Both of them will be used while generating .ARM.extab and .ARM.exidx sections. llvm-svn: 169965
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 169962
-
Evan Cheng authored
mention the inline memcpy / memset expansion code is a mess? This patch split the ZeroOrLdSrc argument into two: IsMemset and ZeroMemset. The first indicates whether it is expanding a memset or a memcpy / memmove. The later is whether the memset is a memset of zero. It's totally possible (likely even) that targets may want to do different things for memcpy and memset of zero. llvm-svn: 169959
-
Evan Cheng authored
Also added more comments to explain why it is generally ok to return true. - Rename getOptimalMemOpType argument IsZeroVal to ZeroOrLdSrc. It's meant to be true for loaded source (memcpy) or zero constants (memset). The poor name choice is probably some kind of legacy issue. llvm-svn: 169954
-
Evan Cheng authored
f64 load / store on non-SSE2 x86 targets. llvm-svn: 169944
-
Jim Grosbach authored
llvm-svn: 169933
-
Jim Grosbach authored
Pre-regalloc frame allocation and referencing has been on by default for ages. No need for the testing option that disables it. llvm-svn: 169931
-
Jim Grosbach authored
Base pointer referencing has been enabled for ages. llvm-svn: 169930
-
Evan Cheng authored
ScalarTargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost() instead. "Legal" is a poorly defined term for something like integer immediate materialization. It is always possible to materialize an integer immediate. Whether to use it for memcpy expansion is more a "cost" conceern. llvm-svn: 169929
-
- Dec 11, 2012
-
-
Tom Stellard authored
A new backend supporting AMD GPUs: Radeon HD2XXX - HD7XXX llvm-svn: 169915
-
Bill Schmidt authored
Given a thread-local symbol x with global-dynamic access, the generated code to obtain x's address is: Instruction Relocation Symbol addis ra,r2,x@got@tlsgd@ha R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA x addi r3,ra,x@got@tlsgd@l R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_L x bl __tls_get_addr(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD x R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr nop <use address in r3> The implementation borrows from the medium code model work for introducing special forms of ADDIS and ADDI into the DAG representation. This is made slightly more complicated by having to introduce a call to the external function __tls_get_addr. Using the full call machinery is overkill and, more importantly, makes it difficult to add a special relocation. So I've introduced another opcode GET_TLS_ADDR to represent the function call, and surrounded it with register copies to set up the parameter and return value. Most of the code is pretty straightforward. I ran into one peculiarity when I introduced a new PPC opcode BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD, which is just like BL8_NOP_ELF except that it takes another parameter to represent the symbol ("x" above) that requires a relocation on the call. Something in the TblGen machinery causes BL8_NOP_ELF and BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD to be treated identically during the emit phase, so this second operand was never visited to generate relocations. This is the reason for the slightly messy workaround in PPCMCCodeEmitter.cpp:getDirectBrEncoding(). Two new tests are included to demonstrate correct external assembly and correct generation of relocations using the integrated assembler. Comments welcome! Thanks, Bill llvm-svn: 169910
-
Patrik Hagglund authored
llvm-svn: 169854
-
Patrik Hagglund authored
MVTs, instead of EVTs. Accordingly, add bitsLT (and similar) to MVT. llvm-svn: 169850
-
Patrik Hagglund authored
EVTs. llvm-svn: 169848
-
Patrik Hagglund authored
of EVT. llvm-svn: 169845
-
Patrik Hagglund authored
Accordingly, add helper funtions getSimpleValueType (in parallel to getValueType) in SDValue, SDNode, and TargetLowering. This is the first, in a series of patches. llvm-svn: 169837
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 169819
-
Jyotsna Verma authored
llvm-svn: 169814
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 169811
-
Chad Rosier authored
This shouldn't affect codegen for -O0 compiles as tail call markers are not emitted in unoptimized compiles. Testing with the external/internal nightly test suite reveals no change in compile time performance. Testing with -O1, -O2 and -O3 with fast-isel enabled did not cause any compile-time or execution-time failures. All tests were performed on my x86 machine. I'll monitor our arm testers to ensure no regressions occur there. In an upcoming clang patch I will be marking the objc_autoreleaseReturnValue and objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue as tail calls unconditionally. While it's theoretically true that this is just an optimization, it's an optimization that we very much want to happen even at -O0, or else ARC applications become substantially harder to debug. Part of rdar://12553082 llvm-svn: 169796
-
Evan Cheng authored
1. Teach it to use overlapping unaligned load / store to copy / set the trailing bytes. e.g. On 86, use two pairs of movups / movaps for 17 - 31 byte copies. 2. Use f64 for memcpy / memset on targets where i64 is not legal but f64 is. e.g. x86 and ARM. 3. When memcpy from a constant string, do *not* replace the load with a constant if it's not possible to materialize an integer immediate with a single instruction (required a new target hook: TLI.isIntImmLegal()). 4. Use unaligned load / stores more aggressively if target hooks indicates they are "fast". 5. Update ARM target hooks to use unaligned load / stores. e.g. vld1.8 / vst1.8. Also increase the threshold to something reasonable (8 for memset, 4 pairs for memcpy). This significantly improves Dhrystone, up to 50% on ARM iOS devices. rdar://12760078 llvm-svn: 169791
-
- Dec 10, 2012
-
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
getMipsRegisterNumbering and use MCRegisterInfo::getEncodingValue instead. llvm-svn: 169760
-
Chandler Carruth authored
Accidental commit... git svn betrayed me. Sorry for the noise. llvm-svn: 169741
-
Chandler Carruth authored
Summary: Not all chips targeted by x86_64 have this feature, but a dramatically increasing number do. Specifying a chip-specific tuning parameter will continue to turn the feature on or off as appropriate for that particular chip, but the generic flag should try to achieve the best performance on the most widely available hardware. Today, the number of chips with fast UA access dwarfs those without in the x86-64 space. Note that this also brings LLVM's code generation for this '-march' flag more in line with that of modern GCCs. CC: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D195 llvm-svn: 169740
-
Chandler Carruth authored
Thanks to the PaX folks for noticing in review! We need some tests here, any sugestions welcome... llvm-svn: 169739
-
Chandler Carruth authored
Intel chips. The model number rules were determined by inspecting Intel's documentation for their newer chip model numbers. My understanding is that all of the newer Intel chips have fast unaligned memory access, but if anyone is concerned about a particular chip, just shout. No tests updated; it's not clear we have dedicated tests for the chips' various features, but if anyone would like tests (or can point me at some existing ones), I'm happy to oblige. llvm-svn: 169730
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 169724
-
- Dec 09, 2012
-
-
Paul Redmond authored
- added function to VectorTargetTransformInfo to query cost of intrinsics - vectorize trivially vectorizable intrinsic calls such as sin, cos, log, etc. Reviewed by: Nadav llvm-svn: 169711
-
Shuxin Yang authored
- fix a bug which cause sigfault. - add two testing cases which was causing crash llvm-svn: 169687
-
- Dec 08, 2012
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
There are still bugs in this pass, as well as other issues that are being worked on, but the bugs are crashers that occur pretty easily in the wild. Test cases have been sent to the original commit's review thread. This reverts the commits: r169671: Fix a logic error. r169604: Move the popcnt tests to an X86 subdirectory. r168931: Initial commit adding the pass. llvm-svn: 169683
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 169676
-
Chandler Carruth authored
std::string to a StringRef. Moreover, the method being called accepts a Twine to simplify these patterns. Fixes this ASan failure: ==6312== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x7fd558b1af58 at pc 0xcb7529 bp 0x7fffff572080 sp 0x7fffff572078 READ of size 1 at 0x7fd558b1af58 thread T0 #0 0xcb7528 .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:192 llvm::StringRef::operator[]() #1 0x1d53c0a .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h:128 llvm::HashString() #2 0x1d53878 .../llvm/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp:64 llvm::StringMapImpl::LookupBucketFor() #3 0x1b6872f .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:352 llvm::StringMap<>::GetOrCreateValue<>() #4 0x1b61836 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCContext.cpp:109 llvm::MCContext::GetOrCreateSymbol() #5 0xe9fd47 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:154 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitMappingSymbol() #6 0xea01dd .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:133 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitDataMappingSymbol() #7 0xe9f78b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:91 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitBytes() #8 0x1b15d82 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp:89 llvm::MCStreamer::EmitIntValue() #9 0xcc0f9b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:713 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes() #10 0xcc0d44 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:632 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::EmitStartOfAsmFile() #11 0x14692ad .../llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:162 llvm::AsmPrinter::doInitialization() #12 0x1bc4677 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1561 llvm::FPPassManager::doInitialization() #13 0x1bc4990 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1595 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule() #14 0x1bc55e5 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1705 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run() #15 0x1bc5878 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1740 llvm::PassManager::run() #16 0xc3954d .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:378 compileModule() #17 0xc38001 .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:194 main #18 0x7fd557d6a11c __libc_start_main 0x7fd558b1af58 is located 24 bytes inside of 29-byte region [0x7fd558b1af40,0x7fd558b1af5d) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0xc337da .../llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:56 operator delete() #1 0x1ee9cef .../libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:535 std::string::~string() #2 0xea01dd .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:133 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitDataMappingSymbol() #3 0xe9f78b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:91 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitBytes() #4 0x1b15d82 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp:89 llvm::MCStreamer::EmitIntValue() #5 0xcc0f9b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:713 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes() #6 0xcc0d44 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:632 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::EmitStartOfAsmFile() #7 0x14692ad .../llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:162 llvm::AsmPrinter::doInitialization() #8 0x1bc4677 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1561 llvm::FPPassManager::doInitialization() #9 0x1bc4990 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1595 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule() #10 0x1bc55e5 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1705 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run() #11 0x1bc5878 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1740 llvm::PassManager::run() #12 0xc3954d .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:378 compileModule() #13 0xc38001 .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:194 main #14 0x7fd557d6a11c __libc_start_main llvm-svn: 169668
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 169651
-