Skip to content
  1. Nov 23, 2010
  2. Nov 22, 2010
  3. Nov 20, 2010
  4. Nov 18, 2010
  5. Nov 17, 2010
  6. Nov 16, 2010
  7. Oct 29, 2010
  8. Oct 24, 2010
    • Duncan Sands's avatar
      Fix PR8445: a block with no predecessors may be the entry block, in which case · 31c803b2
      Duncan Sands authored
      it isn't unreachable and should not be zapped.  The check for the entry block
      was missing in one case: a block containing a unwind instruction.  While there,
      do some small cleanups: "M" is not a great name for a Function* (it would be
      more appropriate for a Module*), change it to "Fn"; use Fn in more places.
      
      llvm-svn: 117224
      31c803b2
  9. Oct 23, 2010
  10. Oct 19, 2010
    • Owen Anderson's avatar
      Passes do not need to recursively initialize passes that they preserve, if · a4fefc19
      Owen Anderson authored
      they do not also require them.  This allows us to reduce inter-pass linkage
      dependencies.
      
      llvm-svn: 116854
      a4fefc19
    • Owen Anderson's avatar
      Get rid of static constructors for pass registration. Instead, every pass... · 6c18d1aa
      Owen Anderson authored
      Get rid of static constructors for pass registration.  Instead, every pass exposes an initializeMyPassFunction(), which
      must be called in the pass's constructor.  This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
      the pass's dependencies.
      
      Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes.  Clients that want to use the
      CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
      before parsing commandline arguments.
      
      I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin.  It is possible that there are problems
      with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options.  If you encounter any crash in pass
      registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
      
      llvm-svn: 116820
      6c18d1aa
  11. Oct 18, 2010
  12. Oct 13, 2010
  13. Oct 12, 2010
  14. Oct 08, 2010
  15. Oct 07, 2010
  16. Sep 29, 2010
  17. Sep 24, 2010
  18. Sep 14, 2010
  19. Sep 13, 2010
  20. Sep 11, 2010
  21. Sep 10, 2010
  22. Sep 04, 2010
  23. Sep 02, 2010
    • Duncan Sands's avatar
      Reapply commit 112699, speculatively reverted by echristo, since · 6778149f
      Duncan Sands authored
      I'm sure it is harmless.  Original commit message:
      If PrototypeValue is erased in the middle of using the SSAUpdator
      then the SSAUpdator may access freed memory.  Instead, simply pass
      in the type and name explicitly, which is all that was used anyway.
      
      llvm-svn: 112810
      6778149f
  24. Sep 01, 2010
  25. Aug 29, 2010
  26. Aug 28, 2010
  27. Aug 26, 2010
  28. Aug 25, 2010
  29. Aug 24, 2010
  30. Aug 23, 2010
  31. Aug 18, 2010
Loading