Skip to content
  1. Feb 19, 2011
  2. Feb 17, 2011
    • John McCall's avatar
      Change the representation of GNU ?: expressions to use a different expression · c07a0c7e
      John McCall authored
      class and to bind the shared value using OpaqueValueExpr.  This fixes an
      unnoticed problem with deserialization of these expressions where the
      deserialized form would lose the vital pointer-equality trait;  or rather,
      it fixes it because this patch also does the right thing for deserializing
      OVEs.
      
      Change OVEs to not be a "temporary object" in the sense that copy elision is
      permitted.
      
      This new representation is not totally unawkward to work with, but I think
      that's really part and parcel with the semantics we're modelling here.  In
      particular, it's much easier to fix things like the copy elision bug and to
      make the CFG look right.
      
      I've tried to update the analyzer to deal with this in at least some          
      obvious cases, and I think we get a much better CFG out, but the printing
      of OpaqueValueExprs probably needs some work.
      
      llvm-svn: 125744
      c07a0c7e
    • Nick Lewycky's avatar
      8d222620
  3. Feb 16, 2011
  4. Feb 15, 2011
  5. Feb 13, 2011
  6. Feb 09, 2011
  7. Feb 08, 2011
  8. Feb 07, 2011
  9. Feb 06, 2011
  10. Feb 05, 2011
  11. Feb 04, 2011
  12. Feb 03, 2011
  13. Feb 02, 2011
  14. Feb 01, 2011
  15. Jan 31, 2011
  16. Jan 30, 2011
    • Anders Carlsson's avatar
      When building with optimizations, emit vtables where the key is not in the · a03f3a85
      Anders Carlsson authored
      current translation unit as available_externally. 
      
      This helps devirtualize the second example in PR3100, comment 18:
      
      struct S { S() {}; virtual void xyzzy(); };
      inline void foo(S *s) { s->xyzzy(); }
      void bar() { S s; foo(&s); }
      
      This involved four major changes:
      
      1. In DefineUsedVTables, always mark virtual member functions as referenced for
         non-template classes and class template specializations.
      2. In CodeGenVTables::ShouldEmitVTableInThisTU return true if optimizations are
         enabled, even if the key function is not implemented in this translation 
         unit. We don't ever do this for code compiled with -fapple-kext, because we
         don't ever want to devirtualize virtual member function calls in that case.
      3. Give the correct linkage for vtables where the key function is not defined.
      4. Update the linkage for RTTI structures when necessary.
      
      llvm-svn: 124565
      a03f3a85
  17. Jan 29, 2011
Loading