- Jul 11, 2013
-
-
Hal Finkel authored
MF is normally initialized in AsmPrinter::SetupMachineFunction, but if the file contains only globals (no functions), then we need this to be initialized because, when encountering an error, lowerConstant() references it. This should fix the non-deterministic failures of test/CodeGen/X86/nonconst-static-iv.ll, etc. llvm-svn: 186068
-
Hal Finkel authored
When computing currently-live registers, the register scavenger excludes undef uses. As a result, undef uses are ignored when computing the restore points of registers spilled into the emergency slots. While the register scavenger normally excludes from consideration, when scavenging, registers used by the current instruction, we need to not exclude undef uses. Otherwise, we might end up requiring more emergency spill slots than we have (in the case where the undef use *is* the currently-spilled register). Another bug found by llvm-stress. llvm-svn: 186067
-
Rui Ueyama authored
llvm-svn: 186066
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 186065
-
Nadav Rotem authored
llvm-svn: 186064
-
Nadav Rotem authored
llvm-svn: 186063
-
Nadav Rotem authored
llvm-svn: 186062
-
Richard Smith authored
followed by an identifier, then diagnose an identifier as being a bogus part of the declarator instead of tripping over it. Improves diagnostics for cases like std::vector<const int *p> my_vec; llvm-svn: 186061
-
Nadav Rotem authored
llvm-svn: 186060
-
James Dennett authored
* More \brief additions/fixes; * Fix some misleading comments about C++11's explicit conversion operators; * Mark up some \code examples; * Add \file documentation. llvm-svn: 186059
-
Nadav Rotem authored
SLPVectorizer: refactor the code that places extracts. Place the code that decides where to put extracts in the build-tree phase. This allows us to take the cost of the extracts into account. llvm-svn: 186058
-
Michael Gottesman authored
Without the changes introduced into this patch, if TRE saw any allocas at all, TRE would not perform TRE *or* mark callsites with the tail marker. Because TRE runs after mem2reg, this inadequacy is not a death sentence. But given a callsite A without escaping alloca argument, A may not be able to have the tail marker placed on it due to a separate callsite B having a write-back parameter passed in via an argument with the nocapture attribute. Assume that B is the only other callsite besides A and B only has nocapture escaping alloca arguments (*NOTE* B may have other arguments that are not passed allocas). In this case not marking A with the tail marker is unnecessarily conservative since: 1. By assumption A has no escaping alloca arguments itself so it can not access the caller's stack via its arguments. 2. Since all of B's escaping alloca arguments are passed as parameters with the nocapture attribute, we know that B does not stash said escaping allocas in a manner that outlives B itself and thus could be accessed indirectly by A. With the changes introduced by this patch: 1. If we see any escaping allocas passed as a capturing argument, we do nothing and bail early. 2. If we do not see any escaping allocas passed as captured arguments but we do see escaping allocas passed as nocapture arguments: i. We do not perform TRE to avoid PR962 since the code generator produces significantly worse code for the dynamic allocas that would be created by the TRE algorithm. ii. If we do not return twice, mark call sites without escaping allocas with the tail marker. *NOTE* This excludes functions with escaping nocapture allocas. 3. If we do not see any escaping allocas at all (whether captured or not): i. If we do not have usage of setjmp, mark all callsites with the tail marker. ii. If there are no dynamic/variable sized allocas in the function, attempt to perform TRE on all callsites in the function. Based off of a patch by Nick Lewycky. rdar://14324281. llvm-svn: 186057
-
James Dennett authored
* Fixing up \brief summaries (adding some, making some briefer); * Standardizing on \commands, not @commands; * Update C++0x references to C++11; * Fix typos and Doxygen warnings. llvm-svn: 186056
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 186055
-
Eli Friedman authored
Sorry about that. llvm-svn: 186054
-
Richard Smith authored
& operator (ignoring any overloaded operator& for the type). The purpose of this builtin is for use in std::addressof, to allow it to be made constexpr; the existing implementation technique (reinterpret_cast to some reference type, take address, reinterpert_cast back) does not permit this because reinterpret_cast between reference types is not permitted in a constant expression in C++11 onwards. llvm-svn: 186053
-
Richard Smith authored
__builtin_addressof. llvm-svn: 186052
-
Hal Finkel authored
I had thought that these tests could be target-neutral, but in practice this is not the case (on some targets, like Hexagon and Darwin), they trigger an assert (a different assert than the one that r186044 fixes). llvm-svn: 186051
-
Jim Ingham authored
Add a -remote-file option to “target create” to specify the location of the executable on a remote system (if debugging remotely using debugserver on the target system.) This gets us closer to being able to set up a remote debugging session from the lldb command line. llvm-svn: 186050
-
Eli Friedman authored
Also fixes a couple minor bugs along the way; see testcases. llvm-svn: 186049
-
Richard Smith authored
llvm-svn: 186048
-
Richard Smith authored
#if defined(__has_foo("X")) && __has_foo("X") is not a correct way to portably use __has_foo, because it is expanded to #if 0 && 0("X") ... which is ill-formed. Also add a missing ')'. llvm-svn: 186047
-
Hal Finkel authored
Trying to fix the i686-mingw32 build. llvm-svn: 186046
-
Hal Finkel authored
For some reason, the Hexagon backend does not reject these invalid static initializer expressions, but instead crashes in AsmPrinter::EmitGlobalConstant. llvm-svn: 186045
-
Hal Finkel authored
A non-constant-foldable static initializer expression containing insertvalue or extractvalue had been causing an assert: Constants.cpp:1971: Assertion `FC && "ExtractValue constant expr couldn't be folded!"' failed. Now we report a more-sensible "Unsupported expression in static initializer" error instead. Fixes PR15417. llvm-svn: 186044
-
Rafael Espindola authored
It is not reliable to depend on the output of llvm_unreachable. The original change will have proper tests when llvm-ar moves to lib/Object (soon). llvm-svn: 186043
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 186042
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 186041
-
Richard Smith authored
lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible whenever there was a prior declaration. llvm-svn: 186040
-
- Jul 10, 2013
-
-
Andrew Kaylor authored
llvm-svn: 186039
-
Rafael Espindola authored
There is no lib/Archive anymore and some archive tests were in test/Archive and others in test/Object. Since archive is just one of the formats supported by lib/Object, test/Object is probably the best location. llvm-svn: 186038
-
Fariborz Jahanian authored
migrate to 'copy attribute if Object class implements NSCopying otherwise assume implied 'strong'. Remove lifetime qualifier on property as it has moved to property's attribute. Added TODO comment for future work by poking into setter implementation. llvm-svn: 186037
-
Adrian Prantl authored
llvm-svn: 186035
-
Tim Northover authored
Patch from Игорь Пашев (I do hope we support utf-8 commit messages; I also hope he'll forgive me for transliterating it as Igor Pashev in case things go horribly wrong). llvm-svn: 186034
-
Matt Kopec authored
llvm-svn: 186033
-
Stephen Lin authored
llvm-svn: 186032
-
Adrian Prantl authored
llvm-svn: 186031
-
Eric Christopher authored
the two sets of debug scope and cleanup scope. llvm-svn: 186030
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 186029
-
Jordan Rose authored
Previously, we asserted that whenever 'new' did not include a constructor call, the type must be a non-record type. In C++11, however, uniform initialization syntax (braces) allow 'new' to construct records with list-initialization: "new Point{1, 2}". Removing this assertion should be perfectly safe; the code here matches what VisitDeclStmt does for regions allocated on the stack. <rdar://problem/14403437> llvm-svn: 186028
-