- Feb 13, 2009
-
-
Mike Stump authored
llvm-svn: 64451
-
Mike Stump authored
llvm-svn: 64450
-
Anders Carlsson authored
llvm-svn: 64447
-
Anders Carlsson authored
llvm-svn: 64446
-
Anders Carlsson authored
llvm-svn: 64445
-
Anders Carlsson authored
llvm-svn: 64441
-
Eli Friedman authored
Currently only used for 128-bit integers. Note that we can't use the fixed-width integer types for other integer modes without other changes because glibc headers redefines (u)int*_t and friends using the mode attribute. For example, this means that uint64_t has to be compatible with unsigned __attribute((mode(DI))), and uint64_t is currently defined to long long. And I have a feeling we'll run into issues if we try to define uint64_t as something which isn't either long or long long. This doesn't get the alignment right in most cases, including the 128-bit integer case; I'll file a PR shortly. The gist of the issue is that the targets don't really expose the information necessary to figure out the alignment outside of the target description, so there's a non-trivial amount of work involved in getting it working right. That said, the alignment used is conservative, so the only issue with the current implementation is ABI compatibility. This makes it trivial to add some sort of "bitwidth" attribute to make arbitrary-width integers; I'll do that in a followup. We could also use this for stuff like the following for compatibility with gcc, but I have a feeling it would be a better idea for clang to be consistent between C and C++ modes rather than follow gcc's example for C mode. struct {unsigned long long x : 33;} x; unsigned long long a(void) {return x.x+1;} llvm-svn: 64434
-
Ted Kremenek authored
- Add 'EvalBind', which will be used by 'EvalStore' to pull much of the value binding logic out of GRTransferFuncs. - Rename many cases of 'St' to 'state'. llvm-svn: 64426
-
Douglas Gregor authored
llvm-svn: 64425
-
Eli Friedman authored
type doesn't do anything. llvm-svn: 64424
-
Chris Lattner authored
only insert spaces between tokens if the code had them or if they are actually required to avoid pasting. This reuses the same logic as -E mode. llvm-svn: 64421
-
Chris Lattner authored
PrintPreprocessedOutput into its own file. No functionality change. llvm-svn: 64418
-
Douglas Gregor authored
given name in a given scope is marked as "overloadable", every function declaration and definition with that same name and in that same scope needs to have the "overloadable" attribute. Essentially, the "overloadable" attribute is not part of attribute merging, so it must be specified even for redeclarations. This keeps users from trying to be too sneaky for their own good: double sin(double) __attribute__((overloadable)); // too sneaky #include <math.h> Previously, this would have made "sin" overloadable, and therefore given it a mangled name. Now, we get an error inside math.h when we see a (re)declaration of "sin" that doesn't have the "overloadable" attribute. llvm-svn: 64414
-
Douglas Gregor authored
ABI to the CodeGen library. Since C++ code-generation is so incomplete, we can't exercise much of this mangling code. However, a few smoke tests show that it's doing the same thing as GCC. When C++ codegen matures, we'll extend the ABI tester to verify name-mangling as well, and complete the implementation here. At this point, the major client of name mangling is in the uses of the new "overloadable" attribute in C, which allows overloading. Any "overloadable" function in C (or in an extern "C" block in C++) will be mangled the same way that the corresponding C++ function would be mangled. llvm-svn: 64413
-
Daniel Dunbar authored
llvm-svn: 64411
-
Mike Stump authored
_GCC_LIMITS_H_ is defined, when __GNUC__ is defined. Also, we need to stay away from possible conflicts with header guards. We should use CLANG_ to prefix all header guards. llvm-svn: 64408
-
- Feb 12, 2009
-
-
Daniel Dunbar authored
llvm-svn: 64397
-
-
Douglas Gregor authored
union subobject initialization before checking whether the next initiailizer was actually a designated initializer. This led to spurious "excess elements in union initializer" errors. Thanks to rdivacky for reporting the bug! llvm-svn: 64392
-
Fariborz Jahanian authored
to a base class (nonfragile abi ir gen bug). llvm-svn: 64391
-
Mike Stump authored
tried to put FIXMEs on the most important things to fix up. Lots left to do including more codegen, more documentation and cleaning code and style cleanups. llvm-svn: 64390
-
Steve Naroff authored
llvm-svn: 64389
-
Anders Carlsson authored
llvm-svn: 64387
-
Fariborz Jahanian authored
abi for objective-c programs. llvm-svn: 64386
-
Steve Naroff authored
- rename isObjCIdType/isObjCClassType -> isObjCIdStructType/isObjCClassStructType. The previous name didn't do what you would expect. - add back isObjCIdType/isObjCClassType to do what you would expect. Not currently used, however many of the isObjCIdStructType/isObjCClassStructType clients could be converted over time. - move static Sema function areComparableObjCInterfaces to ASTContext (renamed to areComparableObjCPointerTypes, since it now operates on pointer types). llvm-svn: 64385
-
Daniel Dunbar authored
llvm-svn: 64380
-
Steve Naroff authored
Turn warning into error. Minor incompatibility with GCC (for scalar types, GCC only produces a warning). llvm-svn: 64375
-
Daniel Dunbar authored
designating an object. llvm-svn: 64371
-
Daniel Dunbar authored
- Doesn't yet handle case where values are passed in mixed (general purpose & floating point) registers; otherwise largely functional. Code still needs some cleaning. Fixes: MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy gcc compat test suite results (Darwin x86-32 & -64): -- # of expected passes 1262 # of unexpected failures 56 # of unresolved testcases 34 # of unsupported tests 2 Compare to: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090209/012050.html llvm-svn: 64370
-
Ted Kremenek authored
llvm-svn: 64356
-
Ted Kremenek authored
llvm-svn: 64355
-
Ted Kremenek authored
llvm-svn: 64354
-
Ted Kremenek authored
to use this stat information in the PTH file using a 'StatSysCallCache' object. Performance impact (Cocoa.h, PTH): - number of stat calls reduces from 1230 to 425 - fsyntax-only: time improves by 4.2% We can reduce the number of stat calls to almost zero by caching negative stat calls and directory stat calls in the PTH file as well. llvm-svn: 64353
-
Ted Kremenek authored
- set the 'StatSysCallCache' object using a setter method instead of FileManager's constructor. This allows the cache to be installed after the FileManager object is created. - Add 'file mode' to FileEntry (useful for stat caching) llvm-svn: 64351
-
Chris Lattner authored
llvm-svn: 64348
-
Anders Carlsson authored
llvm-svn: 64346
-
Ted Kremenek authored
for use by FileManager. FileManager now takes a StatSysCallCache* in its constructor (which defaults to NULL). This will be used for evaluating whether or not caching 'stat' system calls in PTH is a performance win. This shim adds no observable performance impact in the case where the 'StatSysCallCache*' is null. llvm-svn: 64345
-
Douglas Gregor authored
complex conversions where the conversion between the real types is an integral promotion. This is how G++ handles complex promotions for its complex integer extension. llvm-svn: 64344
-
Douglas Gregor authored
system. Since C99 doesn't have overloading and C++ doesn't have _Complex, there is no specification for this. Here's what I think makes sense. Complex conversions come in several flavors: - Complex promotions: a complex -> complex conversion where the underlying real-type conversion is a floating-point promotion. GCC seems to call this a promotion, EDG does something else. This is given "promotion" rank for determining the best viable function. - Complex conversions: a complex -> complex conversion that is not a complex promotion. This is given "conversion" rank for determining the best viable function. - Complex-real conversions: a real -> complex or complex -> real conversion. This is given "conversion" rank for determining the best viable function. These rules are the same for C99 (when using the "overloadable" attribute) and C++. However, there is one difference in the handling of floating-point promotions: in C99, float -> long double and double -> long double are considered promotions (so we give them "promotion" rank), while C++ considers these conversions ("conversion" rank). llvm-svn: 64343
-
Fariborz Jahanian authored
All relevant dejagnu enocding tests pass in this mode. llvm-svn: 64341
-