Skip to content
  1. Sep 12, 2005
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Fix a regression from last night, which caused this pass to create invalid · 8048b85e
      Chris Lattner authored
      code for IV uses outside of loops that are not dominated by the latch block.
      We should only convert these uses to use the post-inc value if they ARE
      dominated by the latch block.
      
      Also use a new LoopInfo method to simplify some code.
      
      This fixes Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/2005-09-12-UsesOutOutsideOfLoop.ll
      
      llvm-svn: 23318
      8048b85e
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Add a new getLoopLatch() method. · b35df5f5
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 23315
      b35df5f5
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      _test: · a6764839
      Chris Lattner authored
              li r2, 0
      LBB_test_1:     ; no_exit.2
              li r5, 0
              stw r5, 0(r3)
              addi r2, r2, 1
              addi r3, r3, 4
              cmpwi cr0, r2, 701
              blt cr0, LBB_test_1     ; no_exit.2
      LBB_test_2:     ; loopexit.2.loopexit
              addi r2, r2, 1
              stw r2, 0(r4)
              blr
      [zion ~/llvm]$ cat > ~/xx
      Uses of IV's outside of the loop should use hte post-incremented version
      of the IV, not the preincremented version.  This helps many loops (e.g. in sixtrack)
      which used to generate code like this (this is the code from the
      dont-hoist-simple-loop-constants.ll testcase):
      
      _test:
              li r2, 0                 **** IV starts at 0
      LBB_test_1:     ; no_exit.2
              or r5, r2, r2            **** Copy for loop exit
              li r2, 0
              stw r2, 0(r3)
              addi r3, r3, 4
              addi r2, r5, 1
              addi r6, r5, 2           **** IV+2
              cmpwi cr0, r6, 701
              blt cr0, LBB_test_1     ; no_exit.2
      LBB_test_2:     ; loopexit.2.loopexit
              addi r2, r5, 2       ****  IV+2
              stw r2, 0(r4)
              blr
      
      And now generated code like this:
      
      _test:
              li r2, 1               *** IV starts at 1
      LBB_test_1:     ; no_exit.2
              li r5, 0
              stw r5, 0(r3)
              addi r2, r2, 1
              addi r3, r3, 4
              cmpwi cr0, r2, 701     *** IV.postinc + 0
              blt cr0, LBB_test_1
      LBB_test_2:     ; loopexit.2.loopexit
              stw r2, 0(r4)          *** IV.postinc + 0
              blr
      
      llvm-svn: 23313
      a6764839
  2. Sep 10, 2005
  3. Sep 09, 2005
  4. Sep 08, 2005
  5. Sep 07, 2005
  6. Sep 06, 2005
  7. Sep 04, 2005
  8. Sep 03, 2005
Loading