pointer.  Its purpose in life is to be a glorified void*, but which does not
implicitly convert to void* or other OpaquePtr's with a different UID.

Introduce Action::DeclPtrTy which is a typedef for OpaquePtr<0>.  Change the 
entire parser/sema interface to use DeclPtrTy instead of DeclTy*.  This
makes the C++ compiler enforce that these aren't convertible to other opaque
types.

We should also convert ExprTy, StmtTy, TypeTy, AttrTy, BaseTy, etc,
but I don't plan to do that in the short term.

The one outstanding known problem with this patch is that we lose the 
bitmangling optimization where ActionResult<DeclPtrTy> doesn't know how to
bitmangle the success bit into the low bit of DeclPtrTy.  I will rectify
this with a subsequent patch.

llvm-svn: 67952

LHS type and the computation result type; this encodes information into 
the AST which is otherwise non-obvious.  Fix Sema to always come up with the 
right answer for both of these types.  Fix IRGen and the analyzer to 
account for these changes.  This fixes PR2601.  The approach is inspired 
by PR2601 comment 2.

Note that this changes real *= complex in CodeGen from a silent 
miscompilation to an explicit error.

I'm not really sure that the analyzer changes are correct, or how to 
test them... someone more familiar with the analyzer should check those 
changes.

llvm-svn: 67889

to a function or function pointer, it's probably because the user
forgot to put in parentheses () to call the function.

llvm-svn: 67826

by changing blocks from being disabled in the parser to being disabled
in Sema.

llvm-svn: 67816

llvm-svn: 67800

uniqued representation that should both save some memory and make it
far easier to properly build canonical types for types involving
dependent nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "typename T::Nested::type".

This approach will greatly simplify the representation of
CXXScopeSpec. That'll be next.

llvm-svn: 67799

Treat @package the same as @public. The documentation for @package says it is analogous to private_extern for variables/functions. Fully implementing this requires some kind of linker support (so access is denied to code outside the classes executable image). I don't believe GCC fully implements this semantic. Will discuss with Fariborz offline.

llvm-svn: 67755

types; add another use of RequireCompleteType.

llvm-svn: 67644

incomplete types. RequireCompleteType is needed when the type may be
completed by instantiating a template.

llvm-svn: 67643

llvm-svn: 67497

incompatibilities in assignments from other pointer incompatibilities.  
Based off of the patch in PR3342.  (This doesn't implement -Wno-pointer-sign,
but I don't know the driver code very well.)

llvm-svn: 67494

isObjCObjectPointerType to work with qualified types.  Adjust test for 
changes.

If the SemaExpr changes are wrong or break existing code, feel free to 
delete the "ExprTy.addConst();" line and revert my changes to 
test/Sema/block-literal.c.

llvm-svn: 67489

llvm-svn: 67485

simplify the parsing and action interface for designated
initializers.

llvm-svn: 67415

llvm-svn: 67394

constants.

llvm-svn: 67390

dot-syntax expression after earching the list of protocols
in the qualified-id, must keep searching the protocol list
of each of the protocols in the list.

llvm-svn: 67314

dependent qualified-ids such as

  Fibonacci<N - 1>::value

where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.

Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.

We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.

llvm-svn: 67308

QualifiedNameType and QualifiedDeclRefExpr. We now keep track of the
exact nested-name-specifier spelling for a QualifiedDeclRefExpr, and
use that spelling when printing ASTs. This fixes PR3493.

llvm-svn: 67283

qualified name, e.g., 

  foo::x

so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.

The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
 
  ::foo::bar::x

The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled). 

The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).

Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.

llvm-svn: 67265

Type pointer. This allows our nested-name-specifiers to retain more
information about the actual spelling (e.g., which typedef did the
user name, or what exact template arguments were used in the
template-id?). It will also allow us to have dependent
nested-name-specifiers that don't map to any DeclContext.

llvm-svn: 67140

Convert a bunch of actions to smart pointers, and also bring PrintParserCallbacks a bit more in line with reality.

llvm-svn: 67029

always, refactored the existing logic to tease apart the parser action
and the semantic analysis shared by the parser and template
instantiation.

llvm-svn: 66987

  - C++ function casts, e.g., T(foo)
  - sizeof(), alignof()

More importantly, this allows us to verify that we're performing
overload resolution during template instantiation, with
argument-dependent lookup and the "cached" results of name lookup from
the template definition.

llvm-svn: 66947

instantiation for binary operators. This change moves most of the
operator-overloading code from the parser action ActOnBinOp to a new,
parser-independent semantic checking routine CreateOverloadedBinOp. 

Of particular importance is the fact that CreateOverloadedBinOp does
*not* perform any name lookup based on the current parsing context (it
doesn't take a Scope*), since it has to be usable during template
instantiation, when there is no scope information. Rather, it takes a
pre-computed set of functions that are visible from the context or via
argument-dependent lookup, and adds to that set any member operators
and built-in operator candidates. The set of functions is computed in
the parser action ActOnBinOp based on the current context (both
operator name lookup and argument-dependent lookup). Within a
template, the set computed by ActOnBinOp is saved within the
type-dependent AST node and is augmented with the results of
argument-dependent name lookup at instantiation time (see
TemplateExprInstantiator::VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr).

Sadly, we can't fully test this yet. I'll follow up with template
instantiation for sizeof so that the real fun can begin.

llvm-svn: 66923

Also changed BlockDecl API to be more consistent (wrt FunctionDecl).

llvm-svn: 66904

This solution is much simpler (and doesn't add any per-scope overhead, which concerned Chris). 

The only downside is the LabelMap is now declared in two places (Sema and BlockSemaInfo). My original fix tried to unify the LabelMap in "Scope" (which would support nested functions in general). In any event, this fixes the bug given the current language definition. If/when we decide to support GCC style nested functions, this will need to be tweaked.

llvm-svn: 66896

Remove ActiveScope (revert http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65694 and http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=66741).

Will replace with something better today...

llvm-svn: 66893

C++ templates. In particular, keep track of the overloaded operators
that are visible from the template definition, so that they can be
merged with those operators visible via argument-dependent lookup at
instantiation time. 

Refactored the lookup routines for argument-dependent lookup and for
operator name lookup, so they can be called without immediately adding
the results to an overload set.

Instantiation of these expressions is completely wrong. I'll work on
that next.

llvm-svn: 66851

llvm-svn: 66837

should fix the largest problem in <rdar://problem/6669847>.

llvm-svn: 66741

llvm-svn: 66696

llvm-svn: 66689

template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?

llvm-svn: 66662

llvm-svn: 66659

llvm-svn: 66658

llvm-svn: 66551

This fixes <rdar://problem/6496506> Implement class setter/getter for properties.

llvm-svn: 66465

Rename DiagnoseIncompleteType to RequireCompleteType, and update the documentation to reflect the fact that we can instantiate templates here

llvm-svn: 66421

llvm-svn: 66416