llvm-svn: 177447

logic as a QOI cleanup.  No functional change.  Tests already in place.
rdar://13456414

llvm-svn: 177446

- Remove useless includes
- Change misleading comments
- Move code into doFinalization

llvm-svn: 177445

llvm-svn: 177444

This is an optimization which produces improved launching time.  There should be no functionality change.  Clients should see no ABI differences.

llvm-svn: 177443

Add a new WriteZero SchedWrite type for the common dependency-breaking
instructions that clear a register.

llvm-svn: 177442

llvm-svn: 177441

added back in by X86AsmPrinter::printIntelMemReference() during codegen.
Previously, this following example

  void t() {
    int i;
    __asm mov eax, [i]
  }

would generate the below assembly

  mov eax, dword ptr [[eax]]

which resulted in a fatal error when compiling.  Test case coming on the
clang side.
rdar://13444264

llvm-svn: 177440

an X86Operand, but also performs a Sema lookup and adds the sizing directive
when appropriate.  Use this when parsing a bracketed statement.  This is
necessary to get the instruction matching correct as well.  Test case coming
on clang side.
rdar://13455408

llvm-svn: 177439

llvm-svn: 177438

We don't want to write out >1000 files at the same time. That could make things
prohibitively expensive. Instead, register the "writeout" function so that it's
emitted serially.
<rdar://problem/12439551>

llvm-svn: 177437

It may be prohibitively expensive to write out >1000 files at the same time. So
we would rather emit them serially. These functions allow the GCOV
implementation to register the functions that writeout the GCOV information per
compile unit. At exit, they are written.
<rdar://problem/12439551>

llvm-svn: 177436

closing rbrace is missing in an ObjC class declaration.
Can do beter than this, but it involves addition of
overhead which will be present in correct code.
// rdar://6854840

llvm-svn: 177435

llvm-svn: 177434

llvm-svn: 177433

- it is trivially known to be used inside the loop in a way that can not be optimized away
- there is no use outside of the loop which can take advantage of the computation hoisting

llvm-svn: 177432

All pre-increment load patterns need to set the mayLoad flag (since
they don't provide a DAG pattern).

This was missing for LHAUX8 and LWAUX, which is added by this patch.

llvm-svn: 177431

As opposed to to pre-increment store patterns, the pre-increment
load patterns were already using standard memory operands, with
the sole exception of LHAU8.

As there's no real reason why LHAU8 should be different here,
this patch simply rewrites the pattern to also use a memri
operand, just like all the other patterns.

llvm-svn: 177430

Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:

  stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)

This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:

  stwu $rS, $dst

To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.

Approved by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 177429

of complex instruction operands (e.g. address modes).

Currently, if a Pat pattern creates an instruction that has a complex
operand (i.e. one that consists of multiple sub-operands at the MI
level), this operand must match a ComplexPattern DAG pattern with the
correct number of output operands.

This commit extends TableGen to alternatively allow match a complex
operands against multiple separate operands at the DAG level.

This allows using Pat patterns to match pre-increment nodes like
pre_store (which must have separate operands at the DAG level) onto
an instruction pattern that uses a multi-operand memory operand,
like the following example on PowerPC (will be committed as a
follow-on patch):

  def STWU  : DForm_1<37, (outs ptr_rc:$ea_res), (ins GPRC:$rS, memri:$dst),
                    "stwu $rS, $dst", LdStStoreUpd, []>,
                    RegConstraint<"$dst.reg = $ea_res">, NoEncode<"$ea_res">;

  def : Pat<(pre_store GPRC:$rS, ptr_rc:$ptrreg, iaddroff:$ptroff),
            (STWU GPRC:$rS, iaddroff:$ptroff, ptr_rc:$ptrreg)>;

Here, the pair of "ptroff" and "ptrreg" operands is matched onto the
complex operand "dst" of class "memri" in the "STWU" instruction.

Approved by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.

llvm-svn: 177428

The tocentry operand class refers to 64-bit values (it is only used in 64-bit,
where iPTR is a 64-bit type), but its sole suboperand is designated as 32-bit
type.  This causes a mismatch to be detected at compile-time with the TableGen
patch I'll check in shortly.

To fix this, this commit changes the suboperand to a 64-bit type as well.

llvm-svn: 177427

  def : Pat<(load (i64 (X86Wrapper tglobaltlsaddr :$dst))),
            (MOV64rm tglobaltlsaddr :$dst)>;

This pattern is invalid because the MOV64rm instruction expects a
source operand of type "i64mem", which is a subclass of X86MemOperand
and thus actually consists of five MI operands, but the Pat provides
only a single MI operand ("tglobaltlsaddr" matches an SDnode of
type ISD::TargetGlobalTLSAddress and provides a single output).

Thus, if the pattern were ever matched, subsequent uses of the MOV64rm
instruction pattern would access uninitialized memory.  In addition,
with the TableGen patch I'm about to check in, this would actually be
reported as a build-time error.

Fortunately, the pattern does in fact never match, for at least two
independent reasons.

First, the code generator actually never generates a pattern of the
form (load (X86Wrapper (tglobaltlsaddr))).  For most combinations of
TLS and code models, (tglobaltlsaddr) represents just an offset that
needs to be added to some base register, so it is never directly
dereferenced.  The only exception is the initial-exec model, where
(tglobaltlsaddr) refers to the (pc-relative) address of a GOT slot,
which *is* in fact directly dereferenced: but in that case, the
X86WrapperRIP node is used, not X86Wrapper, so the Pat doesn't match.

Second, even if some patterns along those lines *were* ever generated,
we should not need an extra Pat pattern to match it.  Instead, the
original MOV64rm instruction pattern ought to match directly, since
it uses an "addr" operand, which is implemented via the SelectAddr
C++ routine; this routine is supposed to accept the full range of
input DAGs that may be implemented by a single mov instruction,
including those cases involving ISD::TargetGlobalTLSAddress (and
actually does so e.g. in the initial-exec case as above).

To avoid build breaks (due to the above-mentioned error) after the
TableGen patch is checked in, I'm removing this Pat here.

llvm-svn: 177426

llvm-svn: 177425

llvm-svn: 177424

Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:

 1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
    cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.

 2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
    (where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).

This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.

Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.

Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.

As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 177423

In case of macro body expansion, check to see if the macro is named NULL and
don't replace inside the macro body. This fixes the case when NULL appears
inside the macro body and the transform replaces the usage of the macro with
nullptr. This is an easy fix for the problem for now and we should analyze the
macro body to see if it expands to only NullToPointer in the future for a more
robust solution that takes care of user defined macros that behaves like NULL.

Other changes:
- Moved complex macro tests to macros.cpp
- Added new test cases.
- Added checks to make sure that the macro bodies are not modified by the tool.

Fixes: PR15396

Author: Tareq A Siraj <tareq.a.siraj@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 177422

Patch by Ahmad, Muhammad T <muhammad.t.ahmad@intel.com>

llvm-svn: 177421

Before:
switch (x) {
case 1:
    // Do amazing stuff
    {
  g();
  f();
}
}

After:
switch (x) {
case 1:
  // Do amazing stuff
  {
    g();
    f();
  }
}

llvm-svn: 177420

Relax test to allow for attributes on other architectures. Caught by powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu buildbot.

llvm-svn: 177419

llvm-svn: 177418

llvm-svn: 177417

Fixed incorrect python that was trying to validate that we got a valid lldb.SBThread object by checking to see if it is equal to "None". 

This test is incorrect as functions that return lldb.SBThread objects never return None, they just return lldb.SBThread objects that contain invalid opaque classes. 

llvm-svn: 177416

Summary: This is implementation for /* */ comments only.

Reviewers: djasper, klimek

Reviewed By: djasper

CC: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D547

llvm-svn: 177415

llvm-svn: 177414

logic as a QOI cleanup.
rdar://13445327

llvm-svn: 177413

llvm-svn: 177411

llvm-svn: 177410

llvm-svn: 177409

The code inside cindex.py was comparing NULL pointer returned by
clang_parseTranslationUnit and clang_createTranslationUnit with None.
However, as illustrated by the two tests I've added, those conditions
were ineffective which resulted in assert triggering later on.

Instead, a pointer is now treated as a boolean value, a NULL pointer being
False.

Contributed-by: Xavier Deguillard <deguilx@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 177408

llvm-svn: 177407