llvm-svn: 50798

llvm-svn: 50795

llvm-svn: 50777

"#if 0" out some assumptions when auto-generating method summaries.

llvm-svn: 50772

llvm-svn: 50769

llvm-svn: 50753

"Execution continues..." message, which does a better job at handling corner cases.

llvm-svn: 50751

(was IdentifierInfo * before). This will make method declartations whole
lot easier.

llvm-svn: 50747

llvm-svn: 50721

llvm-svn: 50715

llvm-svn: 50714

Added test case.

llvm-svn: 50711

llvm-svn: 50710

llvm-svn: 50709

logic for function calls and message expressions.

Use the following heuristic to infer "allocating" instance methods:

  [ClassName classWithXXX]  allocates an object
  
Update testcase to reflect this heuristic.

llvm-svn: 50708

llvm-svn: 50700

llvm-svn: 50697

llvm-svn: 50694

llvm-svn: 50691

llvm-svn: 50690

llvm-svn: 50689

Several fixes to SemaInit.cpp. It's still not enabled (since it fails a few tests). Expect to enable it very soon.

llvm-svn: 50688

llvm-svn: 50684

In a leak's "name", indicate GC or non-GC bugs.

llvm-svn: 50680

llvm-svn: 50679

params not getting installed for builtins when synthesized.

llvm-svn: 50676

generic and handles reference counts for NSObjects.

llvm-svn: 50674

llvm-svn: 50672

llvm-svn: 50666

think it is really right. :)  This fixes PR2284.

llvm-svn: 50665

properties declared in the protocol.

llvm-svn: 50662

the object was last used.  This can be confusing to users.

For example:

 // 'y' is leaked
x = foo(y);

instead:

x = foo(y);
  // 'y' is leaked

llvm-svn: 50661

llvm-svn: 50657

Added test case for NSMakeCollectable.

llvm-svn: 50653

highlight the most nested subexpression that appears most responsible (giving
the user better diagnostic feedback).

Updated test cases to illustrate this feature.

Implements: <rdar://problem/5880443>
llvm-svn: 50647

related to pp-expressions.  Doing so is pretty simple and this
patch implements it, yielding nice diagnostics like:

t.c:2:7: error: division by zero in preprocessor expression
#if 1 / (0 + 0)
    ~ ^ ~~~~~~~
t.c:5:14: error: expected ')' in preprocessor expression
#if (412 + 42
     ~~~~~~~~^
t.c:5:5: error: to match this '('
#if (412 + 42
    ^
t.c:10:10: warning: left side of operator converted from negative value to unsigned: -42 to 18446744073709551574
#if (-42 + 0U) / -2
     ~~~ ^ ~~
t.c:10:16: warning: right side of operator converted from negative value to unsigned: -2 to 18446744073709551614
#if (-42 + 0U) / -2
    ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~
5 diagnostics generated.

llvm-svn: 50638

the final part of PR2279

llvm-svn: 50635

llvm-svn: 50632

llvm-svn: 50631

a) correct rejection of ',' in pp expressions.
b) the precedence of ',' was wrong w.r.t. ?:.

Thanks again to Neil for finding these and providing testcases.

llvm-svn: 50625