Skip to content
  1. Sep 15, 2009
  2. Sep 12, 2009
  3. Sep 11, 2009
  4. Sep 10, 2009
  5. Sep 03, 2009
  6. Sep 02, 2009
  7. Sep 01, 2009
  8. Aug 30, 2009
  9. Aug 27, 2009
  10. Aug 26, 2009
  11. Aug 15, 2009
  12. Aug 12, 2009
  13. Aug 11, 2009
  14. Aug 10, 2009
  15. Aug 09, 2009
  16. Aug 06, 2009
  17. Aug 05, 2009
    • Dan Gohman's avatar
      Enable the new no-SP register classes by default. This is to address · df7ea32a
      Dan Gohman authored
      PR4572. A few tests have some minor code regressions due to different
      coalescing.
      
      llvm-svn: 78217
      df7ea32a
    • Dan Gohman's avatar
      Major calling convention code refactoring. · f9bbcd1a
      Dan Gohman authored
      Instead of awkwardly encoding calling-convention information with ISD::CALL,
      ISD::FORMAL_ARGUMENTS, ISD::RET, and ISD::ARG_FLAGS nodes, TargetLowering
      provides three virtual functions for targets to override:
      LowerFormalArguments, LowerCall, and LowerRet, which replace the custom
      lowering done on the special nodes. They provide the same information, but
      in a more immediately usable format.
      
      This also reworks much of the target-independent tail call logic. The
      decision of whether or not to perform a tail call is now cleanly split
      between target-independent portions, and the target dependent portion
      in IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization.
      
      This also synchronizes all in-tree targets, to help enable future
      refactoring and feature work.
      
      llvm-svn: 78142
      f9bbcd1a
  18. Aug 03, 2009
  19. Aug 02, 2009
  20. Jul 30, 2009
    • Evan Cheng's avatar
      Optimize some common usage patterns of atomic built-ins __sync_add_and_fetch()... · e62288fd
      Evan Cheng authored
      Optimize some common usage patterns of atomic built-ins __sync_add_and_fetch() and __sync_sub_and_fetch. 
      
      When the return value is not used (i.e. only care about the value in the memory), x86 does not have to use add to implement these. Instead, it can use add, sub, inc, dec instructions with the "lock" prefix.
      
      This is currently implemented using a bit of instruction selection trick. The issue is the target independent pattern produces one output and a chain and we want to map it into one that just output a chain. The current trick is to select it into a merge_values with the first definition being an implicit_def. The proper solution is to add new ISD opcodes for the no-output variant. DAG combiner can then transform the node before it gets to target node selection.
      
      Problem #2 is we are adding a whole bunch of x86 atomic instructions when in fact these instructions are identical to the non-lock versions. We need a way to add target specific information to target nodes and have this information carried over to machine instructions. Asm printer (or JIT) can use this information to add the "lock" prefix.
      
      llvm-svn: 77582
      e62288fd
    • Dan Gohman's avatar
      Add a new register class to describe operands that can't be SP, · 49a6f16b
      Dan Gohman authored
      due to x86 encoding restrictions. This is currently off by default
      because it may cause code quality regressions. This is for PR4572.
      
      llvm-svn: 77565
      49a6f16b
  21. Jul 24, 2009
  22. Jul 22, 2009
  23. Jul 21, 2009
  24. Jul 11, 2009
Loading