- Sep 30, 2013
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
This reverts commit r191670. It was causing build failures on the msvc bots: http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/5166/steps/compile/logs/stdio llvm-svn: 191679
-
Tilmann Scheller authored
[ARM] Assembler: ARM LDRD with writeback requires the base register to be different from the destination registers. See ARM ARM A8.8.72. Violating this constraint results in unpredictable behavior. llvm-svn: 191678
-
Arnold Schwaighofer authored
Those writes really need two/three uops. llvm-svn: 191677
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 191676
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 191675
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
Defines away the issue where cast<Instruction> would fail because constant folding happened. Also slightly cleaner. llvm-svn: 191674
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
Inspired by the object from the SLPVectorizer. This found a minor bug in the debug loc restoration in the vectorizer where the location of a following instruction was attached instead of the location from the original instruction. llvm-svn: 191673
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
They don't depend on the templated stuff. llvm-svn: 191672
-
Arnold Schwaighofer authored
For targets that have instruction itineraries this means no change. Targets that move over to the new schedule model will use be able the new schedule module for instruction latencies in the if-converter (the logic is such that if there is no itineary we will use the new sched model for the latencies). Before, we queried "TTI->getInstructionLatency()" for the instruction latency and the extra prediction cost. Now, we query the TargetSchedule abstraction for the instruction latency and TargetInstrInfo for the extra predictation cost. The TargetSchedule abstraction will internally call "TTI->getInstructionLatency" if an itinerary exists, otherwise it will use the new schedule model. ATTENTION: Out of tree targets! (I will also send out an email later to LLVMDev) This means, if your target implements unsigned getInstrLatency(const InstrItineraryData *ItinData, const MachineInstr *MI, unsigned *PredCost); and returns a value for "PredCost", you now also need to implement unsigned getPredictationCost(const MachineInstr *MI); (if your target uses the IfConversion.cpp pass) radar://15077010 llvm-svn: 191671
-
Rafael Espindola authored
Enable building the LTO library (.lib and.dll) and llvm-lto.exe on Windows with MSVC and Mingw as well as re-enabling the associated test. Patch by Greg Bedwell! llvm-svn: 191670
-
Joey Gouly authored
when it was actually a Constant*. There are quite a few other casts to Instruction that might have the same problem, but this is the only one I have a test case for. llvm-svn: 191668
-
Tilmann Scheller authored
llvm-svn: 191664
-
Richard Sandiford authored
For some reason, adding definitions for these load and store instructions changed whether some of the build bots matched comparisons as signed or unsigned. llvm-svn: 191663
-
Richard Sandiford authored
llvm-svn: 191661
-
Richard Sandiford authored
The only thing this does on its own is make the definitions of RISB[HL]G a bit more precise. Those instructions are only used by the MC layer at the moment, so no behavioral change is intended. The class is needed by later patches though. llvm-svn: 191660
-
Richard Sandiford authored
Use subreg_hNN and subreg_lNN for the high and low NN bits of a register. List the low registers first, so that subreg_l32 also means the low 32 bits of a 128-bit register. Floats are stored in the upper 32 bits of a 64-bit register, so they should use subreg_h32 rather than subreg_l32. No behavioral change intended. llvm-svn: 191659
-
Daniel Sanders authored
It now points to the equivalent page on imgtec.com llvm-svn: 191658
-
Richard Sandiford authored
llvm-svn: 191656
-
Richard Sandiford authored
I'm about to add support for high-word operations, so it seemed better for the low-word registers to have names like R0L rather than R0W. No behavioral change intended. llvm-svn: 191655
-
Craig Topper authored
Filter out repeated sections from the X86 disassembler modRMTable. Saves about ~43K from a released build. Unfortunately the disassembler tables are still upwards of 800K. llvm-svn: 191652
-
Craig Topper authored
Add a few more FMA4 disassembler test cases to match the scalar set with regards to combinations of L and W-bits. llvm-svn: 191650
-
Craig Topper authored
Add VEX_LIG to scalar FMA4 instructions. Use VEX_LIG in some of the inheriting checks in disassembler table generator. Make use of VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD contexts. Don't let VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE inherit from their non-L forms unless VEX_LIG is set. Let VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE inherit from all of their non-L or non-W cases. Increase ranking on VEX_L_W, VEX_L_W_XS, VEX_L_W_XD, VEX_L_W_OPSIZE so they get chosen over non-L/non-W forms. llvm-svn: 191649
-
- Sep 29, 2013
-
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
Those can occur in dead code. PR17402. llvm-svn: 191644
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 191643
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 191638
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 191637
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
SDNode destructors are never called. As an optimization use AtomicSDNode's internal storage if we have a small number of operands. llvm-svn: 191636
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 191633
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 191632
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 191630
-
- Sep 28, 2013
-
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 191628
-
Chandler Carruth authored
out in projects. This appears to be working on my system, and I will be watching build bots to see if there are any issues on other platforms. llvm-svn: 191624
-
Robert Wilhelm authored
llvm-svn: 191611
-
Robert Wilhelm authored
llvm-svn: 191610
-
Tom Stellard authored
llvm-svn: 191604
-
Tom Stellard authored
We were completely ignoring the unorder/ordered attributes of condition codes and also incorrectly lowering seto and setuo. Reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune<vljn at ovi.com> llvm-svn: 191603
-
Tom Stellard authored
SelectionDAG will now attempt to inverse an illegal conditon in order to find a legal one and if that doesn't work, it will attempt to swap the operands using the inverted condition. There are no new test cases for this, but a nubmer of the existing R600 tests hit this path. llvm-svn: 191602
-
Tom Stellard authored
This is useful for targets like R600, which only support GT, GE, NE, and EQ condition codes as it removes the need to handle unsupported condition codes in target specific code. There are no tests with this commit, but R600 has been updated to take advantage of this new feature, so its existing selectcc tests are now testing the swapped operands path. llvm-svn: 191601
-
Tom Stellard authored
Interpreting the results of this function is not very intuitive, so I cleaned it up to make it more clear whether or not a SETCC op was legalized and how it was legalized (either by swapping LHS and RHS or replacing with AND/OR). This patch does change functionality in the LHS and RHS swapping case, but unfortunately there are no in-tree tests for this. However, this patch is a prerequisite for R600 to take advantage of the LHS and RHS swapping, so tests will be added in subsequent commits. llvm-svn: 191600
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 191597
-