llvm-svn: 46940

void*.

llvm-svn: 46939

missing.  Otherwise, it is an implicit int case, which is valid in c90 and invalid 
elsewhere, but accepted as an extension.

llvm-svn: 46938

spec-compliant.

I'll put together some testcases in a bit.

llvm-svn: 46937

Add a diagnostics helper to remove some redundant code.

llvm-svn: 46936

llvm-svn: 46935

maybe c380004 can be hyperlinked too?

llvm-svn: 46934

"I have been working my way through the JIT and Kaleidoscope tutorials in my
(minuscule) spare time.  Thanks again for writing them!  I have attached a
patch containing some minor changes, ranging from spelling and grammar fixes
to adding a "Next: <next tutorial section>" hyperlink to the bottom of each
page.

Every page has been given the "next link" treatment, but otherwise I'm only
half way through the Kaleidoscope tutorial.  I will send a follow-on patch
if time permits."

llvm-svn: 46933

This fixes the store case, my previous patch just fixed the load
case.  rdar://5707076.

llvm-svn: 46932

llvm-svn: 46931

llvm-svn: 46930

llvm-svn: 46929

llvm-svn: 46928

llvm-svn: 46926

llvm-svn: 46925

llvm-svn: 46924

llvm-svn: 46923

no-op).

llvm-svn: 46922

llvm-svn: 46921

llvm-svn: 46920

Refine bug fix to Expr::isLvalue (commit r46917).

llvm-svn: 46919

llvm-svn: 46918

Change Expr::isLvalue() to allow the "void" type. This fixes bz2000 submitted by Neil Booth.

Neil, can you point me to the place in the C99 spec that says this is allowed? I thought Expr::isLvalue() conformed to the spec, which says "C99 6.3.2.1: an lvalue is an expression with an object type or an incomplete type other than void.". Please advise.

llvm-svn: 46917

llvm-svn: 46916

pabs{b,w,d} are not two address
fix extract-to-mem sse4 ops
add sse4 vector sign extend nodes

llvm-svn: 46915

llvm-svn: 46914

llvm-svn: 46913

llvm-svn: 46912

llvm-svn: 46911

llvm-svn: 46910

whether SSE is present, on Darwin anyway.  Make it
explicit.

llvm-svn: 46909

llvm-svn: 46908

Add a check if the initial value of the induction variable is 0 (the method comment says it should be).

llvm-svn: 46907

Fix spelling in comment.

llvm-svn: 46906

Fix <rdar://problem/5733511> clang doesn't emit error for const array.

llvm-svn: 46905

initializers, and I don't want to duplicate the bitfield-handling code.  
(I'll send a patch for aggregate initializers to the mailing 
list sometime soon.)

llvm-svn: 46904

llvm-svn: 46903

llvm-svn: 46902

llvm-svn: 46901

common problem of putting two terminators in the same block.  I can't write
a testcase for this because the .ll parser rejects this before the verifier
can, but this can occur when generating IR.

llvm-svn: 46900