llvm-svn: 153353

is retaining the return value of an invoke that it immediately follows.

llvm-svn: 153344

same basic block, and it's not safe to insert code in the successor
blocks if the edges are critical edges. Splitting those edges is
possible, but undesirable, especially on the unwind side. Instead,
make the bottom-up code motion to consider invokes to be part of
their successor blocks, rather than part of their parent blocks, so
that it doesn't push code past them and onto the edges. This fixes
PR12307.

llvm-svn: 153343

dominated by Root, check that B is available throughout the scope.  This
is obviously true (famous last words?) given the current logic, but the
check may be helpful if more complicated reasoning is added one day.

llvm-svn: 153323

llvm-svn: 153322

llvm-svn: 153287

Tests cases have been removed but attached to open PR12330.

llvm-svn: 153286

llvm-svn: 153267

llvm-svn: 153262

llvm-svn: 153260

llvm-svn: 153237

llvm-svn: 153189

llvm-svn: 153150

Do not call SplitBlockPredecessors on a loop preheader when one of the
predecessors is an indirectbr. Otherwise, you will hit this assert:
!isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[i]->getTerminator()) && "Cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst"

llvm-svn: 153134

llvm-svn: 153133

[asan] don't emit __asan_mapping_offset/__asan_mapping_scale by default -- they are currently used only for experiments

llvm-svn: 153040

llvm-svn: 152935

alignment. If that's the case, then we want to make sure that we don't increase
the alignment of the store instruction. Because if we increase it to be "more
aligned" than the pointer, code-gen may use instructions which require a greater
alignment than the pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>

llvm-svn: 152907

It was added in 2007 as the first cut at supporting no-inline
attributes, but we didn't have function attributes of any form at the
time. However, it was added without any mention in the LangRef or other
documentation.

Later on, in 2008, Devang added function notes for 'inline=never' and
then turned them into proper function attributes. From that point
onward, as far as I can tell, the world moved on, and no one has touched
'llvm.noinline' in any meaningful way since.

It's time has now come. We have had better mechanisms for doing this for
a long time, all the frontends I'm aware of use them, and this is just
holding back progress. Given that it was never a documented feature of
the IR, I've provided no auto-upgrade support. If people know of real,
in-the-wild bitcode that relies on this, yell at me and I'll add it, but
I *seriously* doubt anyone cares.

llvm-svn: 152904

directly query the function information which this set was representing.
This simplifies the interface of the inline cost analysis, and makes the
always-inline pass significantly more efficient.

Previously, always-inline would first make a single set of every
function in the module *except* those marked with the always-inline
attribute. It would then query this set at every call site to see if the
function was a member of the set, and if so, refuse to inline it. This
is quite wasteful. Instead, simply check the function attribute directly
when looking at the callsite.

The normal inliner also had similar redundancy. It added every function
in the module with the noinline attribute to its set to ignore, even
though inside the cost analysis function we *already tested* the
noinline attribute and produced the same result.

The only tricky part of removing this is that we have to be able to
correctly remove only the functions inlined by the always-inline pass
when finalizing, which requires a bit of a hack. Still, much less of
a hack than the set of all non-always-inline functions was. While I was
touching this function, I switched a heavy-weight set to a vector with
sort+unique. The algorithm already had a two-phase insert and removal
pattern, we were just needlessly paying the uniquing cost on every
insert.

This probably speeds up some compiles by a small amount (-O0 compiles
with lots of always-inline, so potentially heavy libc++ users), but I've
not tried to measure it.

I believe there is no functional change here, but yell if you spot one.
None are intended.

Finally, the direction this is going in is to greatly simplify the
inline cost query interface so that we can replace its implementation
with a much more clever one. Along the way, all the APIs get simplified,
so it seems incrementally good.

llvm-svn: 152903

Only record IVUsers that are dominated by simplified loop
headers. Otherwise SCEVExpander will crash while looking for a
preheader.

I previously tried to work around this in LSR itself, but that was
insufficient. This way, LSR can continue to run if some uses are not
in simple loops, as long as we don't attempt to analyze those users.

Fixes <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce

llvm-svn: 152892

In InstCombiner::visitOr, make sure we reverse the operand swap used for checking for or-of-xor operations after those checks; a later check expects that any constant will be in Op1.  PR12234.

llvm-svn: 152884

code.
While here, reduce indentation.

llvm-svn: 152803

llvm-svn: 152794

changed since. No one was using it. It is yet another consumer of the
InlineCost interface that I'd like to change.

llvm-svn: 152769

metrics.

llvm-svn: 152760

llvm-svn: 152756

llvm-svn: 152755

[asan] rename class BlackList to FunctionBlackList and move it into a separate file -- we will need the same functionality in ThreadSanitizer

llvm-svn: 152753

should be ignored by ARC optimization, don't insert new ARC runtime
calls in the unwind destination.

llvm-svn: 152748

which are small enough to themselves be inlined. Delaying in this manner
can be harmful if the function is inelligible for inlining in some (or
many) contexts as it pessimizes the code of the function itself in the
event that inlining does not eventually happen.

Previously the check was written to only do this delaying of inlining
for static functions in the hope that they could be entirely deleted and
in the knowledge that all callers of static functions will have the
opportunity to inline if it is in fact profitable. However, with C++ we
get two other important sources of functions where the definition is
always available for inlining: inline functions and templated functions.
This patch generalizes the inliner to allow linkonce-ODR (the linkage
such C++ routines receive) to also qualify for this delay-based
inlining.

Benchmarking across a range of large real-world applications shows
roughly 2% size increase across the board, but an average speedup of
about 0.5%. Some benhcmarks improved over 2%, and the 'clang' binary
itself (when bootstrapped with this feature) shows a 1% -O0 performance
improvement when run over all Sema, Lex, and Parse source code smashed
into a single file. A clean re-build of Clang+LLVM with a bootstrapped
Clang shows approximately 2% improvement, but that measurement is often
noisy.

llvm-svn: 152737

Target override to allow CodeGenPrepare to sink address operands to intrinsics in the same way it current does for loads and stores

llvm-svn: 152666

fixing rdar://11039258, an issue that came up when inspecting clang's 
bootstrapped codegen.

llvm-svn: 152635

llvm-svn: 152634

candidate set for subsequent inlining, try to simplify the arguments to
the inner call site now that inlining has been performed.

The goal here is to propagate and fold constants through deeply nested
call chains. Without doing this, we loose the inliner bonus that should
be applied because the arguments don't match the exact pattern the cost
estimator uses.

Reviewed on IRC by Benjamin Kramer.

llvm-svn: 152556

Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.

llvm-svn: 152532

to count the number of phis changed, not the number visited.

llvm-svn: 152425

traversal, consider nodes for which the only successors are backedges
which the traversal is ignoring to be exit nodes. This fixes a problem
where the bottom-up traversal was failing to visit split blocks along
split loop backedges. This fixes rdar://10989035.

llvm-svn: 152421

negative switch cases if the branch condition is known to be positive.
Inspired by a recent improvement to GCC's VRP.

llvm-svn: 152405

http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120130/136146.html

Implemented CaseIterator and it solves almost all described issues: we don't need to mix operand/case/successor indexing anymore. Base iterator class is implemented as a template since it may be initialized either from "const SwitchInst*" or from "SwitchInst*".

ConstCaseIt is just a read-only iterator.
CaseIt is read-write iterator; it allows to change case successor and case value.

Usage of iterator allows totally remove resolveXXXX methods. All indexing convertions done automatically inside the iterator's getters.

Main way of iterator usage looks like this:
SwitchInst *SI = ... // intialize it somehow

for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->caseBegin(), e = SI->caseEnd(); i != e; ++i) {
  BasicBlock *BB = i.getCaseSuccessor();
  ConstantInt *V = i.getCaseValue();
  // Do something.
}

If you want to convert case number to TerminatorInst successor index, just use getSuccessorIndex iterator's method.
If you want initialize iterator from TerminatorInst successor index, use CaseIt::fromSuccessorIndex(...) method.

There are also related changes in llvm-clients: klee and clang.

llvm-svn: 152297