java constants.

llvm-svn: 13611

fix the really bad code we're getting on PPC.

llvm-svn: 13609

a full 64-bit address, it must be adjusted to fit in the branch instruction's
immediate field. (This is only used in the reoptimizer, for now.)

llvm-svn: 13608

Fix a typo in a debug message.

llvm-svn: 13607

llvm-svn: 13606

Declare function defined in namespace llvm as gcc-3.4 doesn't accept a definition in a namespace of a non-declared function.

llvm-svn: 13602

effects as) CloneFunctionInto().

llvm-svn: 13601

CloneTrace, and because it is primarily an operation on ValueMaps.  It
is now a global (non-static) function which can be pulled in using
ValueMapper.h.

llvm-svn: 13600

llvm-svn: 13593

* Removed redundant function comments

llvm-svn: 13592

llvm-svn: 13591

correct error message.

llvm-svn: 13590

Add better comments, including a better head-of-file comment.
Prune #includes.
Fix a FIXME that Chris put here by using doInitialization().
Use DEBUG() to print out debug msgs.
Give names to basic blocks inserted by this pass.
Expand tabs.
Use InsertProfilingInitCall() from ProfilingUtils to insert the initialize call.

llvm-svn: 13581

llvm-svn: 13580

llvm-svn: 13579

llvm-svn: 13578

llvm-svn: 13577

llvm-svn: 13576

llvm-svn: 13575

llvm-svn: 13574

llvm-svn: 13573

llvm-svn: 13572

llvm-svn: 13571

llvm-svn: 13570

llvm-svn: 13569

MachineBasicBlocks instead.

llvm-svn: 13568

Get rid of separate numbering for LLVM BasicBlocks; use the automatically
generated MachineBasicBlock numbering.

llvm-svn: 13567

LLVM BasicBlock operands.

llvm-svn: 13566

llvm-svn: 13565

in the size calculation.

This is not something you want to see:
Loop Unroll: F[main] Loop %no_exit Loop Size = 2 Trip Count = 2147483648 - UNROLLING!

The problem was that 2*2147483648 == 0.

Now we get:
Loop Unroll: F[main] Loop %no_exit Loop Size = 2 Trip Count = 2147483648 - TOO LARGE: 4294967296>100

Thanks to some anonymous person playing with the demo page that repeatedly
caused zion to go into swapping land.  That's one way to ensure you'll get
a quick bugfix.  :)

Testcase here: Transforms/LoopUnroll/2004-05-13-DontUnrollTooMuch.ll

llvm-svn: 13564

llvm-svn: 13563

llvm-svn: 13560

llvm-svn: 13559

and passing a null pointer into a function.

For this testcase:

void %test(int** %X) {
  store int* null, int** %X
  call void %test(int** null)
  ret void
}

we now generate this:

test:
        sub %ESP, 12
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov DWORD PTR [%EAX], 0
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], 0
        call test
        add %ESP, 12
        ret

instead of this:

test:
        sub %ESP, 12
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov %ECX, 0
        mov DWORD PTR [%EAX], %ECX
        mov %EAX, 0
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], %EAX
        call test
        add %ESP, 12
        ret

llvm-svn: 13558

the alloca address into common operations like loads/stores.

In a simple testcase like this (which is just designed to excersize the
alloca A, nothing more):

int %test(int %X, bool %C) {
        %A = alloca int
        store int %X, int* %A
        store int* %A, int** %G
        br bool %C, label %T, label %F
T:
        call int %test(int 1, bool false)
        %V = load int* %A
        ret int %V
F:
        call int %test(int 123, bool true)
        %V2 = load int* %A
        ret int %V2
}

We now generate:

test:
        sub %ESP, 12
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
        mov %CL, BYTE PTR [%ESP + 20]
***     mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8], %EAX
        mov %EAX, OFFSET G
        lea %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        mov DWORD PTR [%EAX], %EDX
        test %CL, %CL
        je .LBB2 # PC rel: F
.LBB1:  # T
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], 1
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], 0
        call test
***     mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        add %ESP, 12
        ret
.LBB2:  # F
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], 123
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], 1
        call test
***     mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 8]
        add %ESP, 12
        ret

Instead of:

test:
        sub %ESP, 20
        mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 24]
        mov %CL, BYTE PTR [%ESP + 28]
***     lea %EDX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 16]
***     mov DWORD PTR [%EDX], %EAX
        mov %EAX, OFFSET G
        mov DWORD PTR [%EAX], %EDX
        test %CL, %CL
***     mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12], %EDX
        je .LBB2 # PC rel: F
.LBB1:  # T
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], 1
        mov %EAX, 0
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %EAX
        call test
***     mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12]
***     mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%EAX]
        add %ESP, 20
        ret
.LBB2:  # F
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP], 123
        mov %EAX, 1
        mov DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4], %EAX
        call test
***     mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 12]
***     mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%EAX]
        add %ESP, 20
        ret

llvm-svn: 13557

sized allocas in the entry block).  Instead of generating code like this:

entry:
  reg1024 = ESP+1234
... (much later)
  *reg1024 = 17


Generate code that looks like this:
entry:
  (no code generated)
... (much later)
  t = ESP+1234
  *t = 17

The advantage being that we DRAMATICALLY reduce the register pressure for these
silly temporaries (they were all being spilled to the stack, resulting in very
silly code).  This is actually a manual implementation of rematerialization :)

I have a patch to fold the alloca address computation into loads & stores, which
will make this much better still, but just getting this right took way too much time
and I'm sleepy.

llvm-svn: 13554

llvm-svn: 13538

llvm-svn: 13523

  adjust it much easier. Also changed border to gray to fit into the current
  color scheme.
* Convert < and > to &lt; and &gt;, respectively.
* Wrap long lines at 80 cols

llvm-svn: 13522

llvm-svn: 13518