Skip to content
  1. Mar 09, 2014
    • Craig Topper's avatar
      De-virtualize some methods since they don't override anything. · f5e3b0b9
      Craig Topper authored
      llvm-svn: 203379
      f5e3b0b9
    • Craig Topper's avatar
    • David Majnemer's avatar
      Update clang to account for changes made to LLVM in r203376 · 970714bc
      David Majnemer authored
      llvm-svn: 203377
      970714bc
    • David Majnemer's avatar
      IR: Change inalloca's grammar a bit · c4ab61cb
      David Majnemer authored
      The grammar for LLVM IR is not well specified in any document but seems
      to obey the following rules:
      
       - Attributes which have parenthesized arguments are never preceded by
         commas.  This form of attribute is the only one which ever has
         optional arguments.  However, not all of these attributes support
         optional arguments: 'thread_local' supports an optional argument but
         'addrspace' does not.  Interestingly, 'addrspace' is documented as
         being a "qualifier".  What constitutes a qualifier?  I cannot find a
         definition.
      
       - Some attributes use a space between the keyword and the value.
         Examples of this form are 'align' and 'section'.  These are always
         preceded by a comma.
      
       - Otherwise, the attribute has no argument.  These attributes do not
         have a preceding comma.
      
      Sometimes an attribute goes before the instruction, between the
      instruction and it's type, or after it's type.  'atomicrmw' has
      'volatile' between the instruction and the type while 'call' has 'tail'
      preceding the instruction.
      
      With all this in mind, it seems most consistent for 'inalloca' on an
      'inalloca' instruction to occur before between the instruction and the
      type.  Unlike the current formulation, there would be no preceding
      comma.  The combination 'alloca inalloca' doesn't look particularly
      appetizing, perhaps a better spelling of 'inalloca' is down the road.
      
      llvm-svn: 203376
      c4ab61cb
    • David Blaikie's avatar
      Revert "Clean up SmallString a bit" · 259a5a64
      David Blaikie authored
      This reverts commit r203374.
      
      Ambiguities in assign... oh well. I'm just going to revert this and
      probably not try to recommit it as it's not terribly important.
      
      llvm-svn: 203375
      259a5a64
    • David Blaikie's avatar
      Clean up SmallString a bit · d028adf7
      David Blaikie authored
      Move a common utility (assign(iter, iter)) into SmallVector (some of the
      others could be moved there too, but this one seemed particularly
      generic) and replace repetitions overrides with using directives.
      
      And simplify SmallVector::assign(num, element) while I'm here rather
      than thrashing these files (that cause everyone to rebuild) again.
      
      llvm-svn: 203374
      d028adf7
    • David Blaikie's avatar
    • Argyrios Kyrtzidis's avatar
      [Sema] Fix assertion hit with #pragma weak. · 0098a4bd
      Argyrios Kyrtzidis authored
      rdar://16264844
      
      llvm-svn: 203372
      0098a4bd
    • Ahmed Charles's avatar
      [C++11] Fix break due to MSVC bug. · 821b6666
      Ahmed Charles authored
      MSVC (2012, 2013, 2013 Nov CTP) fail on the following code:
      
      int main() {
        int arr[] = {1, 2};
        for (int i : arr)
          do {} while (0);
      }
      
      The fix is to put {} around the for loop. I've reported this to the MSVC
      team.
      
      llvm-svn: 203371
      821b6666
    • Argyrios Kyrtzidis's avatar
      [libclang] Don't pad the main buffer for the preamble. · b255ee91
      Argyrios Kyrtzidis authored
      Padding does not seem to be useful currently, and it leads to bogus location if an error
      points to the end of the file.
      
      rdar://15836513
      
      llvm-svn: 203370
      b255ee91
    • NAKAMURA Takumi's avatar
      clang-tools-extra/test/pp-trace/pp-trace-modules.cpp: Flush module cache to... · 67101a52
      NAKAMURA Takumi authored
      clang-tools-extra/test/pp-trace/pp-trace-modules.cpp: Flush module cache to let robust around r203317.
      
      llvm-svn: 203369
      67101a52
    • NAKAMURA Takumi's avatar
      dc979e8c
    • NAKAMURA Takumi's avatar
      retain-comments-from-system-headers.c: Flush module cache, or incremental test... · 9cd3ce20
      NAKAMURA Takumi authored
      retain-comments-from-system-headers.c: Flush module cache, or incremental test would fail since r203317.
      
      llvm-svn: 203367
      9cd3ce20
    • Ahmed Charles's avatar
      Fix build break. · 5d461ede
      Ahmed Charles authored
      llvm-svn: 203366
      5d461ede
    • Chandler Carruth's avatar
      [C++11] Update Clang for the change to LLVM's Use-Def chain iterators in · 4d01fff4
      Chandler Carruth authored
      r203364: what was use_iterator is now user_iterator, and there is
      a use_iterator for directly iterating over the uses.
      
      This also switches to use the range-based APIs where appropriate.
      
      llvm-svn: 203365
      4d01fff4
    • Chandler Carruth's avatar
      [C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. · cdf47884
      Chandler Carruth authored
      This requires a number of steps.
      1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
         detail
      2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
         iterator.
      3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
         Use to the User.
      4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
      5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
      6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
         they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
         needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
         opaque.
      
      Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
      Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
      switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
      renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
      any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
      touch all of the same lies of code.
      
      The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
      regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
      rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
      a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
      extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
      I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
      a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
      another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
      move.
      
      However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
      a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
      
      llvm-svn: 203364
      cdf47884
    • Ted Kremenek's avatar
      [-Wunreachable-code] Tweak heuristic for configuration values to include... · c980afc5
      Ted Kremenek authored
      [-Wunreachable-code] Tweak heuristic for configuration values to include arithmetic operations involving sizeof(), but not raw integers.
      
      This case was motivated by a false positive with the
      llvm::AlignOf<> specialization in LLVM.
      
      llvm-svn: 203363
      c980afc5
  2. Mar 08, 2014
Loading