[CVP] Simplify and generalize switch handling
CVP currently handles switches by checking an equality predicate on all edges from predecessor blocks. Of course, this can only work if the value being switched over is defined in a different block. Replace this implementation with a call to getPredicateAt(), which also does the predecessor edge predicate check (if not defined in the same block), but can also do quite a bit more: It can reason about phi-nodes by checking edge predicates for incoming values, it can reason about assumes, and it can reason about block values. As such, this makes the implementation both simpler and more powerful. The compile-time impact on CTMark is in the noise.
Loading
Please sign in to comment