Update coding standards for constexpr if statements; NFC
We currently suggest that users not use an else clause after a return statement in a prior if branch. e.g., if (foo) return 1; else // Should remove this else clause return 10; however, this suggestion is incorrect for a constexpr if statement because one of the two branches will be a discarded statement and thus can impact template instantiation behavior. This updates the coding standard to make it clear that it's okay to have a return after an else in a constexpr if statement. I think this is an NFC change to the intent of the rule, which is why I've not started an RFC for the changes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132232
Loading
Please sign in to comment