[DAGCombiner] loosen constraints for fsub+fadd fold
isNegatibleForFree() should not matter here (as the test diffs show) because it's always a win to replace an fsub+fadd with fneg. The problem in D50195 persists because either (1) we are doing these folds in the wrong order or (2) we're missing another fold for fadd. llvm-svn: 339299
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment