Phabricator to trunk.

The previous documentation had a few issues:

* It did not make it explicit that code could be
committed without using the Arcanist tool and how this should be done.

* There was also an implicit assumption on using Subversion
rather than git-svn in the example using Arcanist. The documentation now
explicitly mentions both cases and details how to commit to trunk in
each case.

Reviewers: klimek, probinson

Subscribers: probinson, nwilson, reames, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15801

llvm-svn: 257764

llvm-svn: 257180

llvm-svn: 256265

Summary: Fix a small typo in Phabricator.rst: s/your/you.

Reviewers: rnk

Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11585

llvm-svn: 244231

llvm-svn: 243999

Summary:
I need a test commit for using arc.
This seems like an appropriate commit to use as a test

We may want to port this commit back to 3.7 also

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11527

llvm-svn: 243408

llvm-svn: 241161

reviwes.llvm.org to help reduce confusion.

llvm-svn: 238295

llvm-svn: 233699

llvm-svn: 233600

llvm-svn: 225747

llvm-svn: 212328

llvm-svn: 212184

llvm-svn: 211793

This probably explains why a lot of messages get lost for first time
Phabricator users.

llvm-svn: 211731

llvm-svn: 208764

llvm-svn: 205701

There's now a normal UI for that, apparently.

Patch by Manuel Jacob.

llvm-svn: 203481

I noticed this convention from the commit logs.  It seems like it
would be useful to document it, to encourage other committers to link
back to code reviews in their commits.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2678

llvm-svn: 201160

llvm-svn: 194378

llvm-svn: 187164

llvm-svn: 175047

llvm-svn: 167459

offer up my email to the spam lords for it. Hopefully this will
eventually be more automatic, but we don't want people to think there is
only one option.

llvm-svn: 166870

llvm-svn: 165779

llvm-svn: 165736