- Sep 23, 2019
-
-
Djordje Todorovic authored
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage. The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line 50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526 llvm-svn: 372554
-
Raphael Isemann authored
[lldb] Fix that importing decls in a TagDecl end up in wrong declaration context (partly reverts D61333) Summary: In D61333 we dropped some code from ClangASTSource that checks if imported declarations ended up in the right DeclContext. While this code wasn't tested by the test suite (or better, it was hit by the test suite but we didn't have any checks that were affected) and the code seems pointless (as usually Decls should end up in the right DeclContext), it actually broke the data formatters in LLDB and causes a bunch of obscure bugs where structs suddenly miss all their members. The first report we got about this was that printing a std::map doesn't work anymore when simply doing "expr m" (m is the std::map). This patch reverts D61333 partly and reintroduces the check in a more stricter way (we actually check now that we *move* the Decl and it is in a single DeclContext). This should fix all the problems we currently have until we figure out how to properly fix the underlying issues. I changed the order of some std::map formatter tests which is currently the most reliable way to test this problem (it's a tricky setup, see description below). Fixes rdar://55502701 and rdar://55129537 -------------------------------------- Some more explanation what is actually going on and what is going wrong: The situation we have is that if we have a `std::map m` and do a `expr m`, we end up seeing an empty map (even if `m` has elements). The reason for this is that our data formatter sees that std::pair<int, int> has no members. However, `frame var m` works just fine (and fixes all following `expr m` calls). The reason for why `expr` breaks std::map is that we actually copy the std::map nodes in two steps in the three ASTContexts that are involved: The debug information ASTContext (D-AST), the expression ASTContext we created for the current expression (E-AST) and the persistent ASTContext we use for our $variables (P-AST). When doing `expr m` we do a minimal import of `std::map` from D-AST to E-AST just do the type checking/codegen. This copies std::map itself and does a minimal.import of `std::pair<int, int>` (that is, we don't actually import the `first` and `second` members as we don't need them for anything). After the expression is done, we take the expression result and copy it from E-AST to P-AST. This imports the E-AST's `std::pair` into P-AST which still has no `first` and `second` as they are still undeserialized. Once we are in P-AST, the data formatter tries to inspect `std::map` (and also `std::pair` as that's what the elements are) and it asks for the `std::pair` members. We see that `std::pair` has undeserialized members and go to the ExternalASTSource to ask for them. However, P-ASTs ExternalASTSource points to D-AST (and not E-AST, which `std::pair` came from). It can't point to E-AST as that is only temporary and already gone (and also doesn't actually contain all decls we have in P-AST). So we go to D-AST to get the `std::pair` members. The ASTImporter is asked to copy over `std::pair` members and first checks if `std::pair` is already in P-AST. However, it only finds the std::pair we got from E-AST, so it can't use it's map of already imported declarations and does a comparison between the `std::pair` decls we have Because the ASTImporter thinks they are different declarations, it creates a second `std::pair` and fills in the members `first` and `second` into the second `std::pair`. However, the data formatter is looking at the first `std::pair` which still has no members as they are in the other decl. Now we pretend we have no declarations and just print an empty map as a fallback. The hack we had before fixed this issue by moving `first` and `second` to the first declaration which makes the formatters happy as they can now see the members in the DeclContext they are querying. Obviously this is a temporary patch until we get a real fix but I'm not sure what's the best way to fix this. Implementing that the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl actually understands that the two std::pair's are the same decl fixes the issue, but this doesn't fix the bug for all declarations. My preferred solution would be to complete all declarations in E-AST before they get moved to P-AST (as we anyway have to do this from what I can tell), but that might have unintended side-effects and not sure what's the best way to implement this. Reviewers: friss, martong Reviewed By: martong Subscribers: aprantl, rnkovacs, christof, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits, shafik Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67803 llvm-svn: 372549
-
Raphael Isemann authored
llvm-svn: 372548
-
Marshall Clow authored
Revert "Extension: Mark the default constructor of chrono::duration as conditionally noexcept"; this breaks the gcc5 bot for C++11 This reverts commit c8ca15c95c4c0d6d1356500d5fe49a319ea4ca01. llvm-svn: 372546
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 372544
-
Craig Topper authored
[X86] Remove SETEQ/SETNE canonicalization code from LowerIntVSETCC_AVX512 to prevent an infinite loop. The attached test case would previous infinite loop after r365711. I'm going to move this to X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp to get the setcc to match VPTEST in 32-bit mode in a follow up commit. llvm-svn: 372543
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 372542
-
Richard Smith authored
destructors. llvm-svn: 372541
-
David Zarzycki authored
When AVX512 is available and the preferred vector width is 512-bits or more, we should prefer AVX512 for memcpy(). https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43240 https://reviews.llvm.org/D67874 llvm-svn: 372540
-
Marshall Clow authored
llvm-svn: 372539
-
Richard Smith authored
appropriate during constant evaluation. Note that the evaluator is sometimes invoked on incomplete expressions. In such cases, if an object is constructed but we never reach the point where it would be destroyed (and it has non-trivial destruction), we treat the expression as having an unmodeled side-effect. llvm-svn: 372538
-
Craig Topper authored
[X86] Convert to Constant arguments to MMX shift by i32 intrinsics to TargetConstant during lowering. This allows us to use timm in the isel table which is more consistent with other intrinsics that take an immediate now. We can't declare the intrinsic as taking an ImmArg because we need to match non-constants to the shift by MMX register instruction which we do by mutating the intrinsic id during lowering. llvm-svn: 372537
-
Craig Topper authored
This goes back to when MMX was migrated to intrinsic only. The hack referenced here has been gone for quite a while. llvm-svn: 372536
-
Craig Topper authored
[X86][SelectionDAGBuilder] Move the hack for handling MMX shift by i32 intrinsics into the X86 backend. This intrinsics should be shift by immediate, but gcc allows any i32 scalar and clang needs to match that. So we try to detect the non-constant case and move the data from an integer register to an MMX register. Previously this was done by creating a v2i32 build_vector and bitcast in SelectionDAGBuilder. This had to be done early since v2i32 isn't a legal type. The bitcast+build_vector would be DAG combined to X86ISD::MMX_MOVW2D which isel will turn into a GPR->MMX MOVD. This commit just moves the whole thing to lowering and emits the X86ISD::MMX_MOVW2D directly to avoid the illegal type. The test changes just seem to be due to nodes being linearized in a different order. llvm-svn: 372535
-
Craig Topper authored
[X86] Require last argument to LWPINS/LWPVAL builtins to be an ICE. Add ImmArg to the llvm intrinsics. Update the isel patterns to use timm instead of imm. llvm-svn: 372534
-
David Bolvansky authored
llvm-svn: 372533
-
Roman Lebedev authored
[X86] X86DAGToDAGISel::matchBEXTRFromAndImm(): if can't use BEXTR, fallback to BZHI is profitable (PR43381) Summary: PR43381 notes that while we are good at matching `(X >> C1) & C2` as BEXTR/BEXTRI, we only do that if we either have BEXTRI (TBM), or if BEXTR is marked as being fast (`-mattr=+fast-bextr`). In all other cases we don't match. But that is mainly only true for AMD CPU's. However, for all the CPU's for which we have sched models, the BZHI is always fast (or the sched models are all bad.) So if we decide that it's unprofitable to emit BEXTR/BEXTRI, we should consider falling-back to BZHI if it is available, and follow-up with the shift. While it's really tempting to do something because it's cool it is wise to first think whether it actually makes sense to do. We shouldn't just use BZHI because we can, but only it it is beneficial. In particular, it isn't really worth it if the input is a register, mask is small, or we can fold a load. But it is worth it if the mask does not fit into 32-bits. (careful, i don't know much about intel cpu's, my choice of `-mcpu` may be bad here) Thus we manage to fold a load: https://godbolt.org/z/Er0OQz Or if we'd end up using BZHI anyways because the mask is large: https://godbolt.org/z/dBJ_5h But this isn'r actually profitable in general case, e.g. here we'd increase microop count (the register renaming is free, mca does not model that there it seems) https://godbolt.org/z/k6wFoz Likewise, not worth it if we just get load folding: https://godbolt.org/z/1M1deG https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43381 Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, davezarzycki, spatel Reviewed By: craig.topper, davezarzycki Subscribers: andreadb, hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67875 llvm-svn: 372532
-
David Bolvansky authored
Extracted from D63082. GCC has this warning under -Wint-in-bool-context, but as noted in the D63082's review, we should put it under TautologicalConstantCompare. llvm-svn: 372531
-
- Sep 22, 2019
-
-
Gauthier Harnisch authored
Summary: not every read in CXXConstructorDecl::getExplicitSpecifierInternal() was made on the canonical declaration. Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67889 llvm-svn: 372530
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but we should be able to use cast<VectorType> directly and if not assert will fire for us. llvm-svn: 372529
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
[AMDGPU] isSDNodeAlwaysUniform - silence static analyzer dyn_cast<LoadSDNode> null dereference warning. NFCI. The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<LoadSDNode> directly and if not assert will fire for us. llvm-svn: 372528
-
Michal Gorny authored
Add a 'leak_sanitizer' feature akin to existing '*_sanitizer' features to let programmers switch code paths accounting for leak sanitizers being enabled. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67719 llvm-svn: 372527
-
Craig Topper authored
This seems to have completed omitted any check for the opcode of the operand in the isel table. llvm-svn: 372526
-
Craig Topper authored
[X86][TableGen] Allow timm to appear in output patterns. Use it to remove ConvertToTarget opcodes from the X86 isel table. We're now using a lot more TargetConstant nodes in SelectionDAG. But we were still telling isel to convert some of them to TargetConstants even though they already are. This is because isel emits a conversion anytime the output pattern has a an 'imm'. I guess for patterns in instructions we take the 'timm' from the 'set' pattern, but for Pat patterns with explcicit output we previously had to say 'imm' since 'timm' wasn't allowed in outputs. llvm-svn: 372525
-
Roman Lebedev authored
llvm-svn: 372524
-
Craig Topper authored
We need to match TargetConstant, not Constant. This was broken in r372338, but we lacked test coverage. llvm-svn: 372523
-
Craig Topper authored
Some of the isel patterns were not updated to check for TargetConstant instead of Constant in r372338. llvm-svn: 372522
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Merge the calls, just adjust the demandedelts if we have a valid extract_subvector constant index, else demand all elts. llvm-svn: 372521
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
llvm-svn: 372520
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Add assertions to make it clear that GenerateIVChain / NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs should succeed in finding non-null values llvm-svn: 372518
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
llvm-svn: 372517
-
Yonghong Song authored
Commit c15aa241 ("[CLANG][BPF] change __builtin_preserve_access_index() signature") changed the builtin function signature to PointerT __builtin_preserve_access_index(PointerT ptr) with a pointer type as the argument/return type, where argument and return types must be the same. There is really no reason for this constraint. The builtin just presented a code region so that IR builtins __builtin_{array, struct, union}_preserve_access_index can be applied. This patch removed the pointer type restriction to permit any argument type as long as it is permitted by the compiler. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67883 llvm-svn: 372516
-
Nico Weber authored
llvm-svn: 372515
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
The AVX512 cases still need some work to correct recognise the PMOV truncation cases. llvm-svn: 372514
-
Simon Atanasyan authored
In case of linking binary blobs which do not have any ELF headers, we can deduce MIPS ABI ELF header flags from an `emulation` option. Patch by Kyle Evans. llvm-svn: 372513
-
Nico Weber authored
No behavior change. llvm-svn: 372512
-
Jinsong Ji authored
This fixes buildbot failures for https://reviews.llvm.org/rL372459. (at least on PowerPC/Z ) The fix is generated by running clang-format on the error lines only. llvm-svn: 372511
-
Sanjay Patel authored
This has the potential to uncover missed analysis/folds as shown in the min/max code comment/test, but fewer restrictions on icmp folds should be better in general to solve cases like: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43310 llvm-svn: 372510
-
Sanjay Patel authored
llvm-svn: 372509
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
llvm-svn: 372508
-