Remove this dead code.  We always close it.

llvm-svn: 370488

Summary:
This implements -start-lib and -end-lib flags for lld-link, analogous
to the similarly named options in ld.lld. Object files after
-start-lib are included in the link only when needed to resolve
undefined symbols. The -end-lib flag goes back to the normal behavior
of always including object files in the link. This mimics the
semantics of static libraries, but without needing to actually create
the archive file.

Reviewers: ruiu, smeenai, MaskRay

Reviewed By: ruiu, MaskRay

Subscribers: akhuang, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66848

llvm-svn: 370487

getLoadStorePointerOperand().
Reviewer: hsaito, sebpop, reames, hfinkel, mkuper, bogner, haicheng,
arsenm, lattner, chandlerc, grosser, rengolin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, bmahjour
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66595

llvm-svn: 370486

llvm-svn: 370485

I'm looking at unfolding broadcast loads on AVX512 which will
require refactoring this code to select broadcast opcodes instead
of regular load/stores in some cases. Merging them to avoid
further complicating their interfaces.

llvm-svn: 370484

My follow-up commit to mess with DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH was bogus for two
reasons:

 - The condition was inverted.
 - We were checking the OS's environment, instead of the config's.

Two wrongs don't make a right, but the second mistake meant that the
sanitizer bot passed.

llvm-svn: 370483

Summary: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/134

Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov

Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66995

llvm-svn: 370482

This reverts r370476 (git commit a5590950)

llvm-svn: 370481

Summary:
Instead of recomputing information for call sites we now use the
function information directly. This is always valid and once we have
call site specific information we can improve here.

This patch also bootstraps attributes that are created on-demand through
an initial update call. Information that is known will then directly be
available in the new attribute without causing an iteration delay.

The tests show how this improves the iteration count.

Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku

Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66781

llvm-svn: 370480

Summary:
Any pointer could have load/store users not only floating ones so we
move the manifest logic for alignment into the AAAlignImpl class.

Reviewers: uenoku, sstefan1

Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66922

llvm-svn: 370479

llvm-svn: 370478

Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.

Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith

Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146

llvm-svn: 370476

Summary: Add missing tbuffer loads intrinsics in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.

Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle

Reviewed By: arsenm

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66926

llvm-svn: 370475

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66976

llvm-svn: 370474

Summary: Structured bindings are in a BindingDecl. The decl the declRefExpr points to are the BindingDecls. So this adds an additional if statement in the addToken function to highlight them.

Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov

Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66738

llvm-svn: 370473

Currenly we can encode the 'st_other' field of symbol using 3 fields.
'Visibility' is used to encode STV_* values.
'Other' is used to encode everything except the visibility, but it can't handle arbitrary values.
'StOther' is used to encode arbitrary values when 'Visibility'/'Other' are not helpfull enough.

'st_other' field is used to encode symbol visibility and platform-dependent
flags and values. Problem to encode it is that it consists of Visibility part (STV_* values)
which are enumeration values and the Other part, which is different and inconsistent.

For MIPS the Other part contains flags for all STO_MIPS_* values except STO_MIPS_MIPS16.
(Like comment in ELFDumper says: "Someones in their infinite wisdom decided to make
STO_MIPS_MIPS16 flag overlapped with other ST_MIPS_xxx flags."...)

And for PPC64 the Other part might actually encode any value.

This patch implements custom logic for handling the st_other and removes
'Visibility' and 'StOther' fields.

Here is an example of a new YAML style this patch allows:

- Name:  foo
  Other: [ 0x4 ]
- Name:  bar
  Other: [ STV_PROTECTED, 4 ]
- Name:  zed
  Other: [ STV_PROTECTED, STO_MIPS_OPTIONAL, 0xf8 ]

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66886

llvm-svn: 370472

llvm-svn: 370471

This is hidden behind a (scalar-only) isOneConstant(N1) check at the moment, but once we get around to adding vector support we need to ensure we're dealing with the scalar bitwidth, not the total.

llvm-svn: 370468

llvm-svn: 370467

llvm-svn: 370466

llvm-svn: 370465

llvm-svn: 370464

Summary:
Found a couple of places in the code where all the PHI nodes
of a MBB is updated, replacing references to one MBB by
reference to another MBB instead.

This patch simply refactors the code to use a common helper
(MachineBasicBlock::replacePhiUsesWith) for such PHI node
updates.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, arsenm, uabelho

Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66750

llvm-svn: 370463

One usage of this option remained, and caused dotest to error out if one
happened to pass the -v flag.

llvm-svn: 370462

Summary:
Consider this code:
```
      void f() {
        auto L0 = [](){};
        auto L1 = [](){};
      }

```
First we import `L0` then `L1`. Currently we end up having only one
CXXRecordDecl for the two different lambdas. And that is a problem if
the body of their op() is different. This happens because when we import
`L1` then lookup finds the existing `L0` and since they are structurally
equivalent we just map the imported L0 to be the counterpart of L1.

We have the same problem in this case:
```
      template <typename F0, typename F1>
      void f(F0 L0 = [](){}, F1 L1 = [](){}) {}

```

In StructuralEquivalenceContext we could distinquish lambdas only by
their source location in these cases. But we the lambdas are actually
structrually equivalent they differn only by the source location.

Thus, the  solution is to disable lookup completely if the decl in
the "from" context is a lambda.
However, that could have other problems: what if the lambda is defined
in a header file and included in several TUs? I think we'd have as many
duplicates as many includes we have. I think we could live with that,
because the lambda classes are TU local anyway, we cannot just access
them from another TU.

Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik

Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66348

llvm-svn: 370461

Return a proper zero vector, just in case some elements are undef.

Noticed by inspection after dealing with a similar issue in PR43159.

llvm-svn: 370460

llvm-svn: 370459

--add-symbol to be specified with --new-symbol-visibility

llvm-svn: 370458

Summary:
If importing overridden methods fails for a method it can be seen
incorrectly as non-virtual. To avoid this inconsistency the method
is marked with import error to avoid later use of it.

Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin

Reviewed By: martong, shafik

Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66933

llvm-svn: 370457

Summary: This patch adds an appropriate `initialize` method for `AANoAliasCallSiteArgument`.

Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66927

llvm-svn: 370456

Summary:
- Added checks for broken control flow
- Added unittests

Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet

Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66732

llvm-svn: 370455

Summary:
@mclow.lists brought up this issue up in IRC.
It is a reasonably common problem to compare some two values for equality.
Those may be just some integers, strings or arrays of integers.

In C, there is `memcmp()`, `bcmp()` functions.
In C++, there exists `std::equal()` algorithm.
One can also write that function manually.

libstdc++'s `std::equal()` is specialized to directly call `memcmp()` for
various types, but not `std::byte` from C++2a. https://godbolt.org/z/mx2ejJ

libc++ does not do anything like that, it simply relies on simple C++'s
`operator==()`. https://godbolt.org/z/er0Zwf (GOOD!)

So likely, there exists a certain performance opportunities.
Let's compare performance of naive `std::equal()` (no `memcmp()`) with one that
is using `memcmp()` (in this case, compiled with modified compiler). {F8768213}

```
#include <algorithm>
#include <cmath>
#include <cstdint>
#include <iterator>
#include <limits>
#include <random>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>

#include "benchmark/benchmark.h"

template <class T>
bool equal(T* a, T* a_end, T* b) noexcept {
  for (; a != a_end; ++a, ++b) {
    if (*a != *b) return false;
  }
  return true;
}

template <typename T>
std::vector<T> getVectorOfRandomNumbers(size_t count) {
  std::random_device rd;
  std::mt19937 gen(rd());
  std::uniform_int_distribution<T> dis(std::numeric_limits<T>::min(),
                                       std::numeric_limits<T>::max());
  std::vector<T> v;
  v.reserve(count);
  std::generate_n(std::back_inserter(v), count,
                  [&dis, &gen]() { return dis(gen); });
  assert(v.size() == count);
  return v;
}

struct Identical {
  template <typename T>
  static std::pair<std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>> Gen(size_t count) {
    auto Tmp = getVectorOfRandomNumbers<T>(count);
    return std::make_pair(Tmp, std::move(Tmp));
  }
};

struct InequalHalfway {
  template <typename T>
  static std::pair<std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>> Gen(size_t count) {
    auto V0 = getVectorOfRandomNumbers<T>(count);
    auto V1 = V0;
    V1[V1.size() / size_t(2)]++;  // just change the value.
    return std::make_pair(std::move(V0), std::move(V1));
  }
};

template <class T, class Gen>
void BM_bcmp(benchmark::State& state) {
  const size_t Length = state.range(0);

  const std::pair<std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>> Data =
      Gen::template Gen<T>(Length);
  const std::vector<T>& a = Data.first;
  const std::vector<T>& b = Data.second;
  assert(a.size() == Length && b.size() == a.size());

  benchmark::ClobberMemory();
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(a);
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(a.data());
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(b);
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(b.data());

  for (auto _ : state) {
    const bool is_equal = equal(a.data(), a.data() + a.size(), b.data());
    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(is_equal);
  }
  state.SetComplexityN(Length);
  state.counters["eltcnt"] =
      benchmark::Counter(Length, benchmark::Counter::kIsIterationInvariant);
  state.counters["eltcnt/sec"] =
      benchmark::Counter(Length, benchmark::Counter::kIsIterationInvariantRate);
  const size_t BytesRead = 2 * sizeof(T) * Length;
  state.counters["bytes_read/iteration"] =
      benchmark::Counter(BytesRead, benchmark::Counter::kDefaults,
                         benchmark::Counter::OneK::kIs1024);
  state.counters["bytes_read/sec"] = benchmark::Counter(
      BytesRead, benchmark::Counter::kIsIterationInvariantRate,
      benchmark::Counter::OneK::kIs1024);
}

template <typename T>
static void CustomArguments(benchmark::internal::Benchmark* b) {
  const size_t L2SizeBytes = []() {
    for (const benchmark::CPUInfo::CacheInfo& I :
         benchmark::CPUInfo::Get().caches) {
      if (I.level == 2) return I.size;
    }
    return 0;
  }();
  // What is the largest range we can check to always fit within given L2 cache?
  const size_t MaxLen = L2SizeBytes / /*total bufs*/ 2 /
                        /*maximal elt size*/ sizeof(T) / /*safety margin*/ 2;
  b->RangeMultiplier(2)->Range(1, MaxLen)->Complexity(benchmark::oN);
}

BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint8_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint8_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint16_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint16_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint32_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint32_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint64_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint64_t>);

BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint8_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint8_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint16_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint16_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint32_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint32_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint64_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint64_t>);
```
{F8768210}
```
$ ~/src/googlebenchmark/tools/compare.py --no-utest benchmarks build-{old,new}/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
RUNNING: build-old/test/llvm-bcmp-bench --benchmark_out=/tmp/tmpb6PEUx
2019-04-25 21:17:11
Running build-old/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
Run on (8 X 4000 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
  L1 Data 16K (x8)
  L1 Instruction 64K (x4)
  L2 Unified 2048K (x4)
  L3 Unified 8192K (x1)
Load Average: 0.65, 3.90, 4.14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                         Time             CPU   Iterations UserCounters...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>/512000           432131 ns       432101 ns         1613 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=2.20706G/s eltcnt=825.856M eltcnt/sec=1.18491G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_BigO               0.86 N          0.86 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_RMS                   8 %             8 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>/256000          161408 ns       161409 ns         4027 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=5.90843G/s eltcnt=1030.91M eltcnt/sec=1.58603G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_BigO              0.67 N          0.67 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_RMS                 25 %            25 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>/128000           81497 ns        81488 ns         8415 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=11.7032G/s eltcnt=1077.12M eltcnt/sec=1.57078G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_BigO              0.71 N          0.71 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_RMS                 42 %            42 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>/64000            50138 ns        50138 ns        10909 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=19.0209G/s eltcnt=698.176M eltcnt/sec=1.27647G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_BigO              0.84 N          0.84 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_RMS                 27 %            27 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>/512000      192405 ns       192392 ns         3638 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=4.95694G/s eltcnt=1.86266G eltcnt/sec=2.66124G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO          0.38 N          0.38 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS              3 %             3 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>/256000     127858 ns       127860 ns         5477 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=7.45873G/s eltcnt=1.40211G eltcnt/sec=2.00219G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.50 N          0.50 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS             0 %             0 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>/128000      49140 ns        49140 ns        14281 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=19.4072G/s eltcnt=1.82797G eltcnt/sec=2.60478G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.40 N          0.40 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            18 %            18 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>/64000       32101 ns        32099 ns        21786 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=29.7101G/s eltcnt=1.3943G eltcnt/sec=1.99381G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.50 N          0.50 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS             1 %             1 %
RUNNING: build-new/test/llvm-bcmp-bench --benchmark_out=/tmp/tmpQ46PP0
2019-04-25 21:19:29
Running build-new/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
Run on (8 X 4000 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
  L1 Data 16K (x8)
  L1 Instruction 64K (x4)
  L2 Unified 2048K (x4)
  L3 Unified 8192K (x1)
Load Average: 1.01, 2.85, 3.71
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                         Time             CPU   Iterations UserCounters...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>/512000            18593 ns        18590 ns        37565 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=51.2991G/s eltcnt=19.2333G eltcnt/sec=27.541G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_BigO               0.04 N          0.04 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_RMS                  37 %            37 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>/256000           18950 ns        18948 ns        37223 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=50.3324G/s eltcnt=9.52909G eltcnt/sec=13.511G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_BigO              0.08 N          0.08 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_RMS                 34 %            34 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>/128000           18627 ns        18627 ns        37895 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=51.198G/s eltcnt=4.85056G eltcnt/sec=6.87168G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_BigO              0.16 N          0.16 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_RMS                 35 %            35 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>/64000            18855 ns        18855 ns        37458 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=50.5791G/s eltcnt=2.39731G eltcnt/sec=3.3943G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_BigO              0.32 N          0.32 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_RMS                 33 %            33 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>/512000        9570 ns         9569 ns        73500 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=99.6601G/s eltcnt=37.632G eltcnt/sec=53.5046G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO          0.02 N          0.02 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS             29 %            29 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>/256000       9547 ns         9547 ns        74343 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=99.8971G/s eltcnt=19.0318G eltcnt/sec=26.8159G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.04 N          0.04 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            29 %            29 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>/128000       9396 ns         9394 ns        73521 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=101.518G/s eltcnt=9.41069G eltcnt/sec=13.6255G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.08 N          0.08 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            30 %            30 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>/64000        9499 ns         9498 ns        73802 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=100.405G/s eltcnt=4.72333G eltcnt/sec=6.73808G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.16 N          0.16 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            28 %            28 %
Comparing build-old/test/llvm-bcmp-bench to build-new/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
Benchmark                                                  Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>/512000                      -0.9570         -0.9570        432131         18593        432101         18590
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>/256000                     -0.8826         -0.8826        161408         18950        161409         18948
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>/128000                     -0.7714         -0.7714         81497         18627         81488         18627
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>/64000                      -0.6239         -0.6239         50138         18855         50138         18855
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>/512000                 -0.9503         -0.9503        192405          9570        192392          9569
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>/256000                -0.9253         -0.9253        127858          9547        127860          9547
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>/128000                -0.8088         -0.8088         49140          9396         49140          9394
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>/64000                 -0.7041         -0.7041         32101          9499         32099          9498
```

What can we tell from the benchmark?
* Performance of naive equality check somewhat improves with element size,
  maxing out at eltcnt/sec=1.58603G/s for uint16_t, or bytes_read/sec=19.0209G/s
  for uint64_t. I think, that instability implies performance problems.
* Performance of `memcmp()`-aware benchmark always maxes out at around
  bytes_read/sec=51.2991G/s for every type. That is 2.6x the throughput of the
  naive variant!
* eltcnt/sec metric for the `memcmp()`-aware benchmark maxes out at
  eltcnt/sec=27.541G/s for uint8_t (was: eltcnt/sec=1.18491G/s, so 24x) and
  linearly decreases with element size.
  For uint64_t, it's ~4x+ the elements/second.
* The call obvious is more pricey than the loop, with small element count.
  As it can be seen from the full output {F8768210}, the `memcmp()` is almost
  universally worse, independent of the element size (and thus buffer size) when
  element count is less than 8.

So all in all, bcmp idiom does indeed pose untapped performance headroom.
This diff does implement said idiom recognition. I think a reasonable test
coverage is present, but do tell if there is anything obvious missing.

Now, quality. This does succeed to build and pass the test-suite, at least
without any non-bundled elements. {F8768216} {F8768217}
This transform fires 91 times:
```
$ /build/test-suite/utils/compare.py -m loop-idiom.NumBCmp result-new.json
Tests: 1149
Metric: loop-idiom.NumBCmp

Program                                         result-new

MultiSourc...Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark    79.00
MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser         3.00
SingleSource/UnitTests/vla                      2.00
MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg              1.00
MultiSourc.../Applications/JM/lencod/lencod     1.00
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon            1.00
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet            1.00
MultiSourc...e/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs     1.00
MultiSourc...gs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc     1.00
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator     1.00
```
The size changes are:
I'm not sure what's going on with SingleSource/UnitTests/vla.test yet, did not look.
```
$ /build/test-suite/utils/compare.py -m size..text result-{old,new}.json --filter-hash
Tests: 1149
Same hash: 907 (filtered out)
Remaining: 242
Metric: size..text

Program                                        result-old result-new diff
test-suite...ingleSource/UnitTests/vla.test   753.00     833.00     10.6%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test   1001697.00 966657.00  -3.5%
test-suite...ngs-C/simulator/simulator.test   32369.00   32321.00   -0.1%
test-suite...plications/d/make_dparser.test   89585.00   89505.00   -0.1%
test-suite...ce/Applications/Burg/burg.test   40817.00   40785.00   -0.1%
test-suite.../Applications/lemon/lemon.test   47281.00   47249.00   -0.1%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test   250065.00  250113.00   0.0%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test   149889.00  149873.00  -0.0%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test   769585.00  769569.00  -0.0%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test   770049.00  770049.00   0.0%
test-suite...HMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/128    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...HMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/256    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...CHMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/64    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...CHMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/32    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...ENCHMARK_BILATERAL_FILTER/64/4    NaN        NaN        nan%
Geomean difference                                                   nan%
         result-old    result-new       diff
count  1.000000e+01  10.00000      10.000000
mean   3.152090e+05  311695.40000  0.006749
std    3.790398e+05  372091.42232  0.036605
min    7.530000e+02  833.00000    -0.034981
25%    4.243300e+04  42401.00000  -0.000866
50%    1.197370e+05  119689.00000 -0.000392
75%    6.397050e+05  639705.00000 -0.000005
max    1.001697e+06  966657.00000  0.106242
```

I don't have timings though.

And now to the code. The basic idea is to completely replace the whole loop.
If we can't fully kill it, don't transform.
I have left one or two comments in the code, so hopefully it can be understood.

Also, there is a few TODO's that i have left for follow-ups:
* widening of `memcmp()`/`bcmp()`
* step smaller than the comparison size
* Metadata propagation
* more than two blocks as long as there is still a single backedge?
* ???

Reviewers: reames, fhahn, mkazantsev, chandlerc, craig.topper, courbet

Reviewed By: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, xbolva00, nikic, jfb, gchatelet, courbet, llvm-commits, mclow.lists

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61144

llvm-svn: 370454

Summary:
The internal `Builder` is private, which means there is
currently no way to set the debuginfo locations for `SCEVExpander`.
This only adds the wrappers, but does not use them anywhere.

Reviewers: mkazantsev, sanjoy, gberry, jyknight, dneilson

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61007

llvm-svn: 370453

Summary: TokenBuffer does not collect macro expansions inside macro arguments which is needed for semantic higlighting. Therefore collects macro expansions in the main file in a PPCallback when building the ParsedAST instead.

Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov

Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66928

llvm-svn: 370452

Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66960

llvm-svn: 370451

Summary:
While working on r370054, i've found it frustrating that the test output
was compeletely unhelpful in case of failures. Therefore I've decided to
improve that. In this I reuse the PExpectTest class, which was one of
our mechanisms for running pexpect tests, but which has gotten orhpaned
in the mean time.

I've replaced the existing send methods with a "expect" method, which
I've tried to design so that it has a similar interface to the expect
method in regular non-pexpect dotest tests (as it essentially does
something very similar). I've kept the ability to dump the transcript of
the pexpect communication to stdout in the "trace" mode, as that is a
very handy way to figure out what the test is doing. I've also removed
the "expect_string" method used in the existing tests -- I've found this
to be unhelpful because it hides the message that would be normally
displayed by the EOF exception. Although vebose, this message includes
some important information, like what strings we were searching for,
what were the last bits of lldb output, etc. I've also beefed up the
class to automatically disable the debug info test duplication, and
auto-skip tests when the host platform does not support pexpect.

This patch ports TestMultilineCompletion and TestIOHandlerCompletion to
the new class. It also deletes TestFormats as it is not testing anything
(definitely not formats) -- it was committed with the test code
commented out (r228207), and then the testing code was deleted in
r356000.

Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide

Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66954

llvm-svn: 370449

Summary:
Change LiveDebugValues so that it inserts entry values after the bundle
which contains the clobbering instruction. Previously it would insert
the debug value after the bundle head using insertAfter(), breaking the
bundle.

Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk

Reviewed By: vsk

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #debug-info, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66888

llvm-svn: 370448

Reviewers: jvikstrom

Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66949

llvm-svn: 370446

Summary:
Nico Weber reported that the following code:
  char buf[9];
  asm("" : "=r" (buf));

yields the "impossible constraint in asm: can't store struct into a register"
error message, although |buf| is not a struct (see
http://crbug.com/999160).

Make the error message more generic and add a test for it.
Also make sure other tests in x86_64-PR42672.c check for the full error
message.

Reviewers: eli.friedman, thakis

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66948

llvm-svn: 370444

The `immarg` attribute was added in r355981.

llvm-svn: 370443