- Nov 09, 2019
-
-
Gil Rapaport authored
This recommits 11ed1c02 (reverted in 9f08ce0d for failing an assert) with a fix: tryToWidenMemory() now first checks if the widening decision is to interleave, thus maintaining previous behavior where tryToInterleaveMemory() was called first, giving priority to interleave decisions over widening/scalarization. This commit adds the test case that exposed this bug as a LIT.
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Missed Stats->EnableStats rename in rG3fb832fe8bdc317687d5a4d2ca20f5f73b089341
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
- Fix uninitialized variable warnings. - Reuse BitstreamEntry iterator to avoid Wshadow warning. - Match declaration + definition arg names in BitstreamRemarkParser::processCommonMeta - Make BitstreamRemarkParser(StringRef) constructor explicit
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Rename option 'Stats' to 'EnableStats' and prevent clash with StatisticInfo::Stats member
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Avoid conflict with llvm::remarks::Magic global variable.
-
Jay Foad authored
-
Teresa Johnson authored
Summary: A user can force a function to be inlined by specifying the always_inline attribute. Currently, thinlto implementation is not aware of always_inline functions and does not guarantee import of such functions, which in turn can prevent inlining of such functions. Patch by Bharathi Seshadri <bseshadr@cisco.com> Reviewers: tejohnson Reviewed By: tejohnson Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70014
-
David Blaikie authored
These checks fall out naturally from the current implementation without needing to be explicitly considered anymore.
-
David Blaikie authored
Patch based on Sourabh Singh's D69839 patch.
-
Sam Clegg authored
Also, fix a bug in ranlib where it didn't correctly detect being run without any argument and would try to operate on the empty string. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70021
-
David Blaikie authored
This was arbitrarily appearing in only the last section emitted - which made tests more sensitive than they needed to be (removing the last section - like the macinfo section change that's coming after this) would, surprisingly, move the blank line to the previous section.
-
- Nov 08, 2019
-
-
Fangrui Song authored
Recommit r373168, which was reverted by r373242. This actually exposed a boringssl bug which has been fixed for more than one month. For the following two cases, we currently suppress the symbols. This patch emits them (compatible with GNU as). * `test2_a = undef`: if `undef` is otherwise unused. * `.hidden hidden`: if `hidden` is unused. This is the main point of the patch, because omitting the symbol would cause a linker semantic difference. It causes a behavior change that is not compatible with GNU as: .weakref foo1, bar1 When neither foo1 nor bar1 is used, we now emit bar1, which is arguably more consistent. Another change is that we will emit .TOC. for .TOC.@tocbase . For this directive, suppressing .TOC. can be seen as a size optimization, but we choose to drop it for simplicity and consistency.
-
Stephan T. Lavavej authored
Resolves D69981.
-
joanlluch authored
Summary: This is baseline tests for D69326 Incorporates a command line flag for the MSP430 and adds a test cases to help showing the effects of applying D69326 More details and motivation for this patch in D69326 Reviewers: spatel, asl, lebedev.ri Reviewed By: spatel, asl Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69975
-
Shoaib Meenai authored
Based on a test provided by Ian Levesque <ianlevesque@fb.com>.
-
David Blaikie authored
The macinfo support was broken for LTO situations, by terminating macinfo lists only once - multiple macinfo contributions were correctly labeled, but they all continued/flowed into later contributions until only one terminator appeared at the end of the section. Correctly terminate each contribution & fix the parsing to handle this situation too. The parsing fix is also necessary for dumping linked binaries - the previous code would stop at the end of the first contribution - missing all later contributions in a linked binary. It'd be nice to improve the dumping to print the offsets of each contribution so it'd be easier to know which CU AT_macro_info refers to which macinfo contribution.
-
LLVM GN Syncbot authored
-
bmahjour authored
Summary: This patch adds Pi Blocks to the DDG. A pi-block represents a group of DDG nodes that are part of a strongly-connected component of the graph. Replacing all the SCCs with pi-blocks results in an acyclic representation of the DDG. For example if we have: {a -> b}, {b -> c, d}, {c -> a} the cycle a -> b -> c -> a is abstracted into a pi-block "p" as follows: {p -> d} with "p" containing: {a -> b}, {b -> c}, {c -> a} In this implementation the edges between nodes that are part of the pi-block are preserved. The crossing edges (edges where one end of the edge is in the set of nodes belonging to an SCC and the other end is outside that set) are replaced with corresponding edges to/from the pi-block node instead. Authored By: bmahjour Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert Reviewed By: Meinersbur Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto, ppc-slack Tag: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68827
-
Eli Friedman authored
We had some code for this for 32-bit ARM, but this doesn't really need to be in target-specific code; generalize it. (I think this started showing up recently because we added an optimization that converts pow to powi.) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69013
-
Gil Rapaport authored
This reverts commit 11ed1c02 - causes an assert failure.
-
Nikita Popov authored
Fix cache invalidation by not guarding the dereferenced pointer cache erasure by SeenBlocks. SeenBlocks is only populated when actually caching a value in the block, which doesn't necessarily have to happen just because dereferenced pointers were calculated. ----- Related to D69686. As noted there, LVI currently behaves differently for integer and pointer values: For integers, the block value is always valid inside the basic block, while for pointers it is only valid at the end of the basic block. I believe the integer behavior is the correct one, and CVP relies on it via its getConstantRange() uses. The reason for the special pointer behavior is that LVI checks whether a pointer is dereferenced in a given basic block and marks it as non-null in that case. Of course, this information is valid only after the dereferencing instruction, or in conservative approximation, at the end of the block. This patch changes the treatment of dereferencability: Instead of including it inside the block value, we instead treat it as something similar to an assume (it essentially is a non-nullness assume) and incorporate this information in intersectAssumeOrGuardBlockValueConstantRange() if the context instruction is the terminator of the basic block. This happens either when determining an edge-value internally in LVI, or when a terminator was explicitly passed to getValueAt(). The latter case makes this change not fully NFC, because we can now fold terminator icmps based on the dereferencability information in the same block. This is the reason why I changed one JumpThreading test (it would optimize the condition away without the change). Of course, we do not want to recompute dereferencability on each intersectAssume call, so we need a new cache for this. The dereferencability analysis requires walking the entire basic block and computing underlying objects of all memory operands. This was previously done separately for each queried pointer value. In the new implementation (both because this makes the caching simpler, and because it is faster), I instead only walk the full BB once and cache all the dereferenced pointers. So the traversal is now performed only once per BB, instead of once per queried pointer value. I think the overall model now makes more sense than before, and there will be no more pitfalls due to differing integer/pointer behavior. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69914
-
Jan Korous authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69648
-
Tom Stellard authored
Summary: The options aren't supported so they can be removed. Reviewers: beanz, smeenai, compnerd Reviewed By: compnerd Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69877
-
evgeny authored
Patch enables import of write-only variables with non-trivial initializers to fix linker errors. Initializers of imported variables are converted to 'zeroinitializer' to avoid promotion of referenced objects. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70006
-
Tom Stellard authored
Reviewers: phosek Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69682
-
Kazu Hirata authored
Reviewers: kazu Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70013
-
Nikita Popov authored
This reverts commit 15bc4dc9. clang-cmake-x86_64-sde-avx512-linux buildbot reported quite a few compile-time regressions in test-suite, will investigate.
-
Nikita Popov authored
Related to D69686. As noted there, LVI currently behaves differently for integer and pointer values: For integers, the block value is always valid inside the basic block, while for pointers it is only valid at the end of the basic block. I believe the integer behavior is the correct one, and CVP relies on it via its getConstantRange() uses. The reason for the special pointer behavior is that LVI checks whether a pointer is dereferenced in a given basic block and marks it as non-null in that case. Of course, this information is valid only after the dereferencing instruction, or in conservative approximation, at the end of the block. This patch changes the treatment of dereferencability: Instead of including it inside the block value, we instead treat it as something similar to an assume (it essentially is a non-nullness assume) and incorporate this information in intersectAssumeOrGuardBlockValueConstantRange() if the context instruction is the terminator of the basic block. This happens either when determining an edge-value internally in LVI, or when a terminator was explicitly passed to getValueAt(). The latter case makes this change not fully NFC, because we can now fold terminator icmps based on the dereferencability information in the same block. This is the reason why I changed one JumpThreading test (it would optimize the condition away without the change). Of course, we do not want to recompute dereferencability on each intersectAssume call, so we need a new cache for this. The dereferencability analysis requires walking the entire basic block and computing underlying objects of all memory operands. This was previously done separately for each queried pointer value. In the new implementation (both because this makes the caching simpler, and because it is faster), I instead only walk the full BB once and cache all the dereferenced pointers. So the traversal is now performed only once per BB, instead of once per queried pointer value. I think the overall model now makes more sense than before, and there will be no more pitfalls due to differing integer/pointer behavior. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69914
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Remove default values from constructor.
-
Philip Reames authored
This patch implements a correct, but not terribly useful, transform. In particular, if we have a dynamic alloca in a loop which is guaranteed to execute, and provably not captured, we hoist the alloca out of the loop. The capture tracking is needed so that we can prove that each previous stack region dies before the next one is allocated. The transform decreases the amount of stack allocation needed by a linear factor (e.g. the iteration count of the loop). Now, I really hope no one is actually using dynamic allocas. As such, why this patch? Well, the actual problem I'm hoping to make progress on is allocation hoisting. There's a large draft patch out for review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60056), and this patch was the smallest chunk of testable functionality I could come up with which takes a step vaguely in that direction. Once this is in, it makes motivating the changes to capture tracking mentioned in TODOs testable. After that, I hope to extend this to trivial malloc free regions (i.e. free dominating all loop exits) and allocation functions for GCed languages. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69227
-