- Apr 29, 2014
-
-
Michael Zolotukhin authored
llvm-svn: 207499
-
- Apr 25, 2014
-
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 207196
-
- Apr 22, 2014
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/... edition. This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE. Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the modules implementation. llvm-svn: 206844
-
- Apr 18, 2014
-
-
Nuno Lopes authored
lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp | 18 ------------------ lib/Analysis/RegionPass.cpp | 1 - lib/Analysis/TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp | 1 - lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp | 21 --------------------- lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp | 2 -- lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp | 6 ------ utils/TableGen/AsmWriterEmitter.cpp | 13 ------------- utils/TableGen/DFAPacketizerEmitter.cpp | 7 ------- utils/TableGen/IntrinsicEmitter.cpp | 2 -- 9 files changed, 71 deletions(-) llvm-svn: 206506
-
- Mar 05, 2014
-
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 202953
-
- Mar 04, 2014
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
IR types. llvm-svn: 202827
-
- Jan 23, 2014
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
function and a FunctionPass. This has many benefits. The motivating use case was to be able to compute function analysis passes *after* running LoopSimplify (to avoid invalidating them) and then to run other passes which require LoopSimplify. Specifically passes like unrolling and vectorization are critical to wire up to BranchProbabilityInfo and BlockFrequencyInfo so that they can be profile aware. For the LoopVectorize pass the only things in the way are LoopSimplify and LCSSA. This fixes LoopSimplify and LCSSA is next on my list. There are also a bunch of other benefits of doing this: - It is now very feasible to make more passes *preserve* LoopSimplify because they can simply run it after changing a loop. Because subsequence passes can assume LoopSimplify is preserved we can reduce the runs of this pass to the times when we actually mutate a loop structure. - The new pass manager should be able to more easily support loop passes factored in this way. - We can at long, long last observe that LoopSimplify is preserved across SCEV. This *halves* the number of times we run LoopSimplify!!! Now, getting here wasn't trivial. First off, the interfaces used by LoopSimplify are all over the map regarding how analysis are updated. We end up with weird "pass" parameters as a consequence. I'll try to clean at least some of this up later -- I'll have to have it all clean for the new pass manager. Next up I discovered a really frustrating bug. LoopUnroll *claims* to preserve LoopSimplify. That's actually a lie. But the way the LoopPassManager ends up running the passes, it always ran LoopSimplify on the unrolled-into loop, rectifying this oversight before any verification could kick in and point out that in fact nothing was preserved. So I've added code to the unroller to *actually* simplify the surrounding loop when it succeeds at unrolling. The only functional change in the test suite is that we now catch a case that was previously missed because SCEV and other loop transforms see their containing loops as simplified and thus don't miss some opportunities. One test case has been converted to check that we catch this case rather than checking that we miss it but at least don't get the wrong answer. Note that I have #if-ed out all of the verification logic in LoopSimplify! This is a temporary workaround while extracting these bits from the LoopPassManager. Currently, there is no way to have a pass in the LoopPassManager which preserves LoopSimplify along with one which does not. The LPM will try to verify on each loop in the nest that LoopSimplify holds but the now-Function-pass cannot distinguish what loop is being verified and so must try to verify all of them. The inner most loop is clearly no longer simplified as there is a pass which didn't even *attempt* to preserve it. =/ Once I get LCSSA out (and maybe LoopVectorize and some other fixes) I'll be able to re-enable this check and catch any places where we are still failing to preserve LoopSimplify. If this causes problems I can back this out and try to commit *all* of this at once, but so far this seems to work and allow much more incremental progress. llvm-svn: 199884
-
- Jan 13, 2014
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
can be used by both the new pass manager and the old. This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn, tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface. The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of this split should match the split between CallGraph and CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass manager significantly easier. Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to directly recomputing the domtree. llvm-svn: 199104
-
Chandler Carruth authored
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis. Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API. But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really confusing structure until that day arrives. llvm-svn: 199082
-
- Jan 06, 2014
-
-
Andrew Trick authored
Now with a fix for PR18384: ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted. We need to invalidate SCEV's loop info when we delete a block, even if no values are hoisted. llvm-svn: 198631
-
- Jan 04, 2014
-
-
Alp Toker authored
This commit was the source of crasher PR18384: While deleting: label %for.cond127 An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! UNREACHABLE executed at llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp:671! Reverting to get the builders green, feel free to re-land after fixing up. (Renato has a handy isolated repro if you need it.) This reverts commit r198478. llvm-svn: 198503
-
Andrew Trick authored
getSCEV for an ashr instruction creates an intermediate zext expression when it truncates its operand. The operand is initially inside the loop, so the narrow zext expression has a non-loop-invariant loop disposition. LoopSimplify then runs on an outer loop, hoists the ashr operand, and properly invalidate the SCEVs that are mapped to value. The SCEV expression for the ashr is now an AddRec with the hoisted value as the now loop-invariant start value. The LoopDisposition of this wide value was properly invalidated during LoopSimplify. However, if we later get the ashr SCEV again, we again try to create the intermediate zext expression. We get the same SCEV that we did earlier, and it is still cached because it was never mapped to a Value. When we try to create a new AddRec we abort because we're using the old non-loop-invariant LoopDisposition. I don't have a solution for this other than to clear LoopDisposition when LoopSimplify hoists things. I think the long-term strategy should be to perform LoopSimplify on all loops before computing SCEV and before running any loop opts on individual loops. It's possible we may want to rerun LoopSimplify on individual loops, but it should rarely do anything, so rarely require invalidating SCEV. llvm-svn: 198478
-
- May 20, 2013
-
-
Hal Finkel authored
As discussed, LoopUtils.h is a better name. llvm-svn: 182314
-
Hal Finkel authored
Other passes, PPC counter-loop formation for example, also need to add loop preheaders outside of the regular loop simplification pass. This makes InsertPreheaderForLoop a global function so that it can be used by other passes. No functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 182299
-
- Jan 02, 2013
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point of file layout clutter in LLVM. There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each layer easier. The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today. I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my tests think, but I may have missed something). I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily. llvm-svn: 171366
-
- Dec 03, 2012
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes. I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything (I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the API being implemented. Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main module rule does in fact have its merits. =] llvm-svn: 169131
-
- Oct 26, 2012
-
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
This is currently true, but may change when DA grows more aggressive caching. Without this setting it's impossible to use DA from a LoopPass because DA is a function pass and cannot be properly scheduled in between LoopPasses. The LoopManager reacts to this with an infinite loop which made this really annoying to debug. llvm-svn: 166788
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
The LoopSimplify bug is pretty harmless because the loop goes from unanalyzable to analyzable but the LCSSA bug is very nasty. It only comes into play with a specific order of the LoopPassManager worklist and can cause actual miscompilations, when a SCEV refers to a value that has been replaced with PHI node. SCEVExpander may then insert code into the wrong place, either violating domination or randomly miscompiling stuff. Comes with an extensive test case reduced from the test-suite with bugpoint+SCEVValidator. llvm-svn: 166787
-
- Mar 20, 2012
-
-
Andrew Trick authored
Do not call SplitBlockPredecessors on a loop preheader when one of the predecessors is an indirectbr. Otherwise, you will hit this assert: !isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[i]->getTerminator()) && "Cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst" llvm-svn: 153134
-
Andrew Trick authored
llvm-svn: 153133
-
- Dec 15, 2011
-
-
Eli Friedman authored
Make loop preheader insertion in LoopSimplify handle the case where the loop header is a landing pad correctly (by splitting the landingpad out of the loop header). Make some adjustments to the rest of LoopSimplify to make it clear that the rest of LoopSimplify isn't making bad assumptions about the presence of landing pads. PR11575. llvm-svn: 146621
-
- Dec 09, 2011
-
-
Jakub Staszak authored
llvm-svn: 146277
-
- Dec 01, 2011
-
-
Chad Rosier authored
InstructionSimplify.cpp. Other fixups as needed. Part of rdar://10500969 llvm-svn: 145559
-
- Aug 19, 2011
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
We have to be careful when splitting the landing pad block, because the landingpad instruction is required to remain as the first non-PHI of an invoke's unwind edge. To retain this, we split the block into two blocks, moving the predecessors within the loop to one block and the remaining predecessors to the other. The landingpad instruction is cloned into the new blocks. llvm-svn: 138015
-
- Aug 18, 2011
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
aren't from an indirect branch need to be dominated by the loop header. llvm-svn: 137981
-
- Aug 17, 2011
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
One way to exit the loop is through an unwind edge. However, that may involve splitting the critical edge of the landing pad, which is non-trivial. Prevent the transformation from rewriting the landing pad exit loop block. llvm-svn: 137871
-
- Aug 12, 2011
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
when building with assertions disabled. llvm-svn: 137460
-
- Aug 03, 2011
-
-
Andrew Trick authored
to notify SCEV of a change. Add forgetLoop in a couple of those places. llvm-svn: 136797
-
Andrew Trick authored
llvm-svn: 136795
-
- Jun 17, 2011
-
-
Devang Patel authored
llvm-svn: 133298
-
- Apr 15, 2011
-
-
Chris Lattner authored
Luis Felipe Strano Moraes! llvm-svn: 129558
-
- Mar 30, 2011
-
-
Jay Foad authored
PHINode::Create() giving the (known or expected) number of operands. llvm-svn: 128537
-
- Feb 11, 2011
-
-
Cameron Zwarich authored
llvm-svn: 125317
-
- Jan 18, 2011
-
-
Cameron Zwarich authored
dominance and post-dominance frontiers. llvm-svn: 123725
-
- Jan 11, 2011
-
-
Chris Lattner authored
llvm-svn: 123247
-
- Jan 02, 2011
-
-
Chris Lattner authored
so that Dominators.h is *just* domtree. Also prune #includes a bit. llvm-svn: 122714
-
Duncan Sands authored
in the PR, the pass could break LCSSA form when inserting preheaders. It probably would be easy enough to fix this, but since currently we always go into LCSSA form after running this pass, doing so is not urgent. llvm-svn: 122695
-
- Nov 18, 2010
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
preserves LCSSA form out of ScalarEvolution and into the LoopInfo class. Use it to check that SimplifyInstruction simplifications are not breaking LCSSA form. Fixes PR8622. llvm-svn: 119727
-
- Nov 16, 2010
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
rather than calling hasConstantValue. No intended functionality change. llvm-svn: 119352
-
- Oct 19, 2010
-
-
Owen Anderson authored
Get rid of static constructors for pass registration. Instead, every pass exposes an initializeMyPassFunction(), which must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize the pass's dependencies. Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h before parsing commandline arguments. I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly. llvm-svn: 116820
-