Summary:
This patch makes LoopUnswitch use new incremental API for updating dominators.
It also updates SplitCriticalEdge, as it is called in LoopUnswitch.

There doesn't seem to be any noticeable performance difference when bootstrapping clang with this patch.

Reviewers: dberlin, davide, sanjoy, grosser, chandlerc

Reviewed By: davide, grosser

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35528

llvm-svn: 311093

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22688

llvm-svn: 276449

llvm-svn: 267292

Continuing the work from last week to remove implicit ilist iterator
conversions.  First related commit was probably r249767, with some more
motivation in r249925.  This edition gets LLVMTransformUtils compiling
without the implicit conversions.

No functional change intended.

llvm-svn: 250142

This change was done as an audit and is by inspection.  The new EH
system is still very much a work in progress.  NFC for the landingpad
case.

llvm-svn: 243965

through APIs that are no longer necessary now that the update API has
been removed.

This will make changes to the AA interfaces significantly less
disruptive (I hope). Either way, it seems like a really nice cleanup.

llvm-svn: 242882

Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.

llvm-svn: 240390

The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
  -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
  llvm/lib/


Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!

llvm-svn: 240137

APIs and replace it and numerous booleans with an option struct.

The critical edge splitting API has a really large surface of flags and
so it seems worth burning a small option struct / builder. This struct
can be constructed with the various preserved analyses and then flags
can be flipped in a builder style.

The various users are now responsible for directly passing along their
analysis information. This should be enough for the critical edge
splitting to work cleanly with the new pass manager as well.

This API is still pretty crufty and could be cleaned up a lot, but I've
focused on this change just threading an option struct rather than
a pass through the API.

llvm-svn: 226456

we can while splitting critical edges.

The only code which called this and didn't require simplified loops to
be preserved is polly, and the code behaves correctly there anyways.
Without this change, it becomes really hard to share this code with the
new pass manager where things like preserving loop simplify form don't
make any sense.

If anyone discovers this code behaving incorrectly, what it *should* be
testing for is whether the loops it needs to be in simplified form are
in fact in that form. It should always be trying to preserve that form
when it exists.

llvm-svn: 226443

rather than relying on the pass object.

This one is a bit annoying, but will pay off. First, supporting this one
will make the next one much easier, and for utilities like LoopSimplify,
this is moving them (slowly) closer to not having to pass the pass
object around throughout their APIs.

llvm-svn: 226396

cleaner to derive from the generic base.

Thise removes a ton of boiler plate code and somewhat strange and
pointless indirections. It also remove a bunch of the previously needed
friend declarations. To fully remove these, I also lifted the verify
logic into the generic LoopInfoBase, which seems good anyways -- it is
generic and useful logic even for the machine side.

llvm-svn: 226385

a LoopInfoWrapperPass to wire the object up to the legacy pass manager.

This switches all the clients of LoopInfo over and paves the way to port
LoopInfo to the new pass manager. No functionality change is intended
with this iteration.

llvm-svn: 226373

Summary:
move the code from BreakCriticalEdges::runOnFunction()
into a separate utility function llvm::SplitAllCriticalEdges()
so that it can be used independently.
No functionality change intended.

Test Plan: check-llvm

Reviewers: nlewycky

Reviewed By: nlewycky

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6313

llvm-svn: 222288

This reverts commit r213474 (and r213475), which causes a miscompile on
a stage2 LTO build.  I'll reply on the list in a moment.

llvm-svn: 213562

Summary: This patch introduces two new iterator ranges and updates existing code to use it.  No functional change intended.

Test Plan: All tests (make check-all) still pass.

Reviewers: dblaikie

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4481

llvm-svn: 213474

llvm-svn: 207196

definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.

This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.

Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.

llvm-svn: 206844

llvm-svn: 202953

IR types.

llvm-svn: 202827

preserve loop simplify of enclosing loops.

The problem here starts with LoopRotation which ends up cloning code out
of the latch into the new preheader it is buidling. This can create
a new edge from the preheader into the exit block of the loop which
breaks LoopSimplify form. The code tries to fix this by splitting the
critical edge between the latch and the exit block to get a new exit
block that only the latch dominates. This sadly isn't sufficient.

The exit block may be an exit block for multiple nested loops. When we
clone an edge from the latch of the inner loop to the new preheader
being built in the outer loop, we create an exiting edge from the outer
loop to this exit block. Despite breaking the LoopSimplify form for the
inner loop, this is fine for the outer loop. However, when we split the
edge from the inner loop to the exit block, we create a new block which
is in neither the inner nor outer loop as the new exit block. This is
a predecessor to the old exit block, and so the split itself takes the
outer loop out of LoopSimplify form. We need to split every edge
entering the exit block from inside a loop nested more deeply than the
exit block in order to preserve all of the loop simplify constraints.

Once we try to do that, a problem with splitting critical edges
surfaces. Previously, we tried a very brute force to update LoopSimplify
form by re-computing it for all exit blocks. We don't need to do this,
and doing this much will sometimes but not always overlap with the
LoopRotate bug fix. Instead, the code needs to specifically handle the
cases which can start to violate LoopSimplify -- they aren't that
common. We need to see if the destination of the split edge was a loop
exit block in simplified form for the loop of the source of the edge.
For this to be true, all the predecessors need to be in the exact same
loop as the source of the edge being split. If the dest block was
originally in this form, we have to split all of the deges back into
this loop to recover it. The old mechanism of doing this was
conservatively correct because at least *one* of the exiting blocks it
rewrote was the DestBB and so the DestBB's predecessors were fixed. But
this is a much more targeted way of doing it. Making it targeted is
important, because ballooning the set of edges touched prevents
LoopRotate from being able to split edges *it* needs to split to
preserve loop simplify in a coherent way -- the critical edge splitting
would sometimes find the other edges in need of splitting but not
others.

Many, *many* thanks for help from Nick reducing these test cases
mightily. And helping lots with the analysis here as this one was quite
tricky to track down.

llvm-svn: 200393

can be used by both the new pass manager and the old.

This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and
lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn,
tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very
straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface.

The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of
this split should match the split between CallGraph and
CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been
updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The
goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather
than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass
manager significantly easier.

Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from
re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to
directly recomputing the domtree.

llvm-svn: 199104

directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.

Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.

But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.

llvm-svn: 199082

infrastructure.

This was essentially work toward PGO based on a design that had several
flaws, partially dating from a time when LLVM had a different
architecture, and with an effort to modernize it abandoned without being
completed. Since then, it has bitrotted for several years further. The
result is nearly unusable, and isn't helping any of the modern PGO
efforts. Instead, it is getting in the way, adding confusion about PGO
in LLVM and distracting everyone with maintenance on essentially dead
code. Removing it paves the way for modern efforts around PGO.

Among other effects, this removes the last of the runtime libraries from
LLVM. Those are being developed in the separate 'compiler-rt' project
now, with somewhat different licensing specifically more approriate for
runtimes.

llvm-svn: 191835

Adds unit tests for it too.

Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the
analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable
into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG.

llvm-svn: 187283

into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.

Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]

llvm-svn: 169131

Revert 'Fix a typo 'iff' => 'if''. iff is an abreviation of if and only if. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if Commit 164767

llvm-svn: 164768

llvm-svn: 164767

Allow the "SplitCriticalEdge" function to split the edge to a landing pad. If
the pass is *sure* that it thinks it knows what it's doing, then it may go ahead
and specify that the landing pad can have its critical edge split. The loop
unswitch pass is one of these passes. It will split the critical edges of all
edges coming from a loop to a landing pad not within the loop. Doing so will
retain important loop analysis information, such as loop simplify.

llvm-svn: 155817

llvm-svn: 155816

llvm-svn: 146277

This handles the case in which LSR rewrites an IV user that is a phi and
splits critical edges originating from a switch.
Fixes <rdar://problem/6453893> LSR is not splitting edges "nicely"

llvm-svn: 141059

llvm-svn: 141058

Some passes require breaking critical edges before they're called. Don't
segfault because of that.

llvm-svn: 140196

so requires more care than this generic algorithm should handle.

llvm-svn: 137866

llvm-svn: 135534

-Wshorten-64-to-32 warning in Instructions.h.

llvm-svn: 133708

"Reinstate r133435 and r133449 (reverted in r133499) now that the clang
self-hosted build failure has been fixed (r133512)."

Due to some additional warnings.

llvm-svn: 133700

self-hosted build failure has been fixed (r133512).

llvm-svn: 133513