- Aug 19, 2013
-
-
Eric Christopher authored
llvm-svn: 188711
-
Matt Arsenault authored
Re-add the inboundsless tests I didn't add originally llvm-svn: 188710
-
Eric Christopher authored
Until gdb supports the new accelerator tables we should add the pubnames section so that gdb_index can be generated from gold at link time. On darwin we already emit the accelerator tables and so don't need to worry about pubnames. llvm-svn: 188708
-
Paul Redmond authored
- split WidenVecRes_Binary into WidenVecRes_Binary and WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap - WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap preserves the original behaviour for operations that can trap - WidenVecRes_Binary simply widens the operation and improves codegen for 3-element vectors by allowing widening and promotion on x86 (matches the behaviour of unary and ternary operation widening) - use WidenVecRes_Binary for operations on integers. Reviewed by: nrotem llvm-svn: 188699
-
Andrew Kaylor authored
llvm-svn: 188697
-
Akira Hatanaka authored
llvm-svn: 188690
-
Peter Collingbourne authored
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1437 llvm-svn: 188688
-
Mihai Popa authored
The Thumb2 add immediate is in fact defined for SP. The manual is misleading as it points to a different section for add immediate with SP, however the encoding is the same as for add immediate with register only with the SP operand hard coded. As such add immediate with SP and add immediate with register can safely be treated as the same instruction. All the patch does is adjust a register constraint on an instruction alias. llvm-svn: 188676
-
Elena Demikhovsky authored
ADD, SUB, MUL integer and FP types. OR, AND, XOR. Added embeded broadcast form for these instructions. llvm-svn: 188673
-
Richard Sandiford authored
For now this matches the equivalent of (neg (abs ...)), which did hit a few times in projects/test-suite. We should probably also match cases where absolute-like selects are used with reversed arguments. llvm-svn: 188671
-
Richard Sandiford authored
llvm-svn: 188670
-
Richard Sandiford authored
This first cut is pretty conservative. The final argument register (R6) is call-saved, so we would need to make sure that the R6 argument to a sibling call is the same as the R6 argument to the calling function, which seems worth keeping as a separate patch. Saying that integer truncations are free means that we no longer use the extending instructions LGF and LLGF for spills in int-conv-09.ll and int-conv-10.ll. Instead we treat the registers as 64 bits wide and truncate them to 32-bits where necessary. I think it's unlikely we'd use LGF and LLGF for spills in other situations for the same reason, so I'm removing the tests rather than replacing them. The associated code is generic and applies to many more instructions than just LGF and LLGF, so there is no corresponding code removal. llvm-svn: 188669
-
Michael Kuperstein authored
* pow(x, 0.5) -> fabs(sqrt(x)) * pow(2.0, x) -> exp2(x) llvm-svn: 188656
-
Hal Finkel authored
We had previously been asserting when faced with a FCOPYSIGN f64, ppcf128 node because there was no way to expand the FCOPYSIGN node. Because ppcf128 is the sum of two doubles, and the first double must have the larger magnitude, we can take the sign from the first double. As a result, in addition to fixing the crash, this is also an optimization. llvm-svn: 188655
-
Hal Finkel authored
Modern PPC cores support a floating-point copysign instruction, and we can use this to lower the FCOPYSIGN node (which is created from calls to the libm copysign function). A couple of extra patterns are necessary because the operand types of FCOPYSIGN need not agree. llvm-svn: 188653
-
David Blaikie authored
This reduces the noise in diffs making it more likely that, at least for LLVM revision-over-revision, diffs will actually yield usable results. This is consistent with objdump's DWARF dumping behavior. llvm-svn: 188650
-
David Blaikie authored
We check this in many/all other cases, just missed this one it seems. Perhaps it'd be worth unifying this so we never emit zero-length DW_AT_names. llvm-svn: 188649
-
Peter Collingbourne authored
It turned out that I didn't need this for DFSan. llvm-svn: 188646
-
- Aug 18, 2013
-
-
Tim Northover authored
When patching inlineasm nodes to use GPRPair for 64-bit values, we were dropping the information that two operands were tied, which effectively broke the live-interval of vregs affected. llvm-svn: 188643
-
Elena Demikhovsky authored
llvm-svn: 188637
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 188629
-
Dmitri Gribenko authored
llvm-svn: 188626
-
Chandler Carruth authored
allocated by setupterm. Without this, some folks are seeing leaked memory whenever this routine is called more than once. Thanks to Craig Topper for the report. llvm-svn: 188615
-
Hal Finkel authored
This fixes SCEVExpander so that it does not create multiple distinct induction variables for duplicate PHI entries. Specifically, given some code like this: do.body6: ; preds = %do.body6, %do.body6, %if.then5 %end.0 = phi i8* [ undef, %if.then5 ], [ %incdec.ptr, %do.body6 ], [ %incdec.ptr, %do.body6 ] ... Note that it is legal to have multiple entries for a basic block so long as the associated value is the same. So the above input is okay, but expanding an AddRec in this loop could produce code like this: do.body6: ; preds = %do.body6, %do.body6, %if.then5 %indvar = phi i64 [ %indvar.next, %do.body6 ], [ %indvar.next1, %do.body6 ], [ 0, %if.then5 ] %end.0 = phi i8* [ undef, %if.then5 ], [ %incdec.ptr, %do.body6 ], [ %incdec.ptr, %do.body6 ] ... %indvar.next = add i64 %indvar, 1 %indvar.next1 = add i64 %indvar, 1 And this is not legal because there are two PHI entries for %do.body6 each with a distinct value. Unfortunately, I don't have an in-tree test case. llvm-svn: 188614
-
- Aug 17, 2013
-
-
Joerg Sonnenberger authored
next value. This avoids crashes due to invalidation. Patch by Joey Gouly. llvm-svn: 188605
-
Tom Stellard authored
Spotted by Nick Lewycky! llvm-svn: 188599
-
Tom Stellard authored
Reviewed-by:
Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> llvm-svn: 188598
-
Tom Stellard authored
Reviewed-by:
Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> llvm-svn: 188597
-
Tom Stellard authored
Reviewed-by:
Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com> llvm-svn: 188596
-
Jim Grosbach authored
Ongoing 'make the verifier happy' improvements to ARM fast-isel. rdar://12594152 llvm-svn: 188595
-
Jim Grosbach authored
Properly constrain the operand register class for instructions used in [sz]ext expansion. Update more tests to use the verifier now that we're getting the register classes correct. rdar://12594152 llvm-svn: 188594
-
Jim Grosbach authored
Teach the generic instruction selection helper functions to constrain the register classes of their input operands. For non-physical register references, the generic code needs to be careful not to mess that up when replacing references to result registers. As the comment indicates for MachineRegisterInfo::replaceRegWith(), it's important to call constrainRegClass() first. rdar://12594152 llvm-svn: 188593
-
Jim Grosbach authored
Lots of machine verifier errors result from using a plain GPR regclass for incoming argument copies. A more restrictive rGPR class is more appropriate since it more accurately represents what's happening, plus it lines up better with isel later on so the verifier is happier. Reduces the number of ARM fast-isel tests not running with the verifier enabled by over half. rdar://12594152 llvm-svn: 188592
-
Reed Kotler authored
This regards how mips16 is viewed. It's not really a target type but there has always been a target for it in the td files. It's more properly -mcpu=mips32 -mattr=+mips16 . This is how clang treats it but we have always had the -mcpu=mips16 which I probably should delete now but it will require updating all the .ll test cases for mips16. In this case it changed how we decide if we have a count bits instruction and whether instruction lowering should then expand ctlz. Now that we have dual mode compilation, -mattr=+mips16 really just indicates the inital processor mode that we are compiling for. (It is also possible to have -mcpu=64 -mattr=+mips16 but as far as I know, nobody has even built such a processor, though there is an architecture manual for this). llvm-svn: 188586
-
Reid Kleckner authored
Clang doesn't support the MSVC __cpuid intrinsic yet, and fixing that is blocked on some fairly complicated issues. llvm-svn: 188584
-
- Aug 16, 2013
-
-
David Blaikie authored
DebugInfo: Allow the addition of other (such as static data) members to a record type after construction Plus a type cleanup & minor fix to enumerate members of declarations. llvm-svn: 188577
-
Bill Schmidt authored
safe on PPC32 SVR4 ABI [Patch and following text by Mark Minich; committing on his behalf.] There are FIXME's in PowerPC/PPCFrameLowering.cpp, method PPCFrameLowering::emitPrologue() related to "negative offsets of R1" on PPC32 SVR4. They're true, but the real issue is that on PPC32 SVR4 (and any ABI without a Red Zone), no spills may be made until after the stackframe is claimed, which also includes the LR spill which is at a positive offset. The same problem exists in emitEpilogue(), though there's no FIXME for it. I intend to fix this issue, making LLVM-compiled code finally safe for use on SVR4/EABI/e500 32-bit platforms (including in particular, OS-free embedded systems & kernel code, where interrupts may share the same stack as user code). In preparation for making these changes, to make the diffs for the functional changes less cluttered, I am providing the non-functional refactorings in two stages: Stage 1 does some minor fluffy refactorings to pull multiple method calls up into a single bool, creating named bools for repeated uses of obscure logic, moving some code up earlier because either stage 2 or my final version will require it earlier, and rewording/adding some comments. My stage 1 changes can be characterized as primarily fluffy cleanup, the purpose of which may be unclear until the stage 2 or final changes are made. My stage 2 refactorings combine the separate PPC32 & PPC64 logic, which is currently performed by largely duplicate code, into a single flow, with the differences handled by a group of constants initialized early in the methods. This submission is for my stage 1 changes. There should be no functional changes whatsoever; this is a pure refactoring. llvm-svn: 188573
-
Richard Mitton authored
If an ELF relocation is pointed at an absolute address, it will have a symbol ID of zero. RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef was not previously handling this case, and was instead trying to handle it as a section-relative fixup. I think this is the right fix here, but my elf-fu is poor on some of the more exotic platforms, so I'd appreciate it if anyone with greater knowledge could verify this. llvm-svn: 188572
-
Aaron Ballman authored
llvm-svn: 188566
-
Aaron Ballman authored
llvm-svn: 188565
-