Skip to content
  1. Oct 17, 2012
  2. Oct 15, 2012
  3. Oct 13, 2012
  4. Oct 12, 2012
  5. Oct 11, 2012
  6. Oct 10, 2012
    • Sean Silva's avatar
      docs: Propagate fix from r165632 to other docs. · 529ecebe
      Sean Silva authored
      There are only two other instances of using `.. code::` instead of
      `..  code-block::`.
      
      llvm-svn: 165633
      529ecebe
    • Sean Silva's avatar
      docs: Attempt to fix PR14053. · 9ce5c066
      Sean Silva authored
      Hypothesis 1: use of `.. code::` directive instead of `.. code-block::`
      is causing Sphinx to discard the block. On my machine, `.. code::`
      renders fine. However, I don't think that `..  code::` is actually a
      legit Sphinx directive. I believe that on my machine Sphinx is falling
      back to just displaying it monospace with no syntax, whereas llvm.org's
      Sphinx is just discarding it.
      
      This is truly "remote debugging" since I can't reproduce this on my
      machine. It would be helpful to be able to see the llvm.org Sphinx
      build logs; if that's possible please let me know.
      
      llvm-svn: 165632
      9ce5c066
  7. Oct 09, 2012
  8. Oct 08, 2012
  9. Oct 07, 2012
  10. Oct 05, 2012
  11. Oct 04, 2012
  12. Oct 01, 2012
  13. Sep 30, 2012
  14. Sep 28, 2012
  15. Sep 27, 2012
Loading