Skip to content
  1. Mar 19, 2009
    • Fariborz Jahanian's avatar
      When looking for property name (or getter method) in a · d302bbd0
      Fariborz Jahanian authored
      dot-syntax expression after earching the list of protocols
      in the qualified-id, must keep searching the protocol list
      of each of the protocols in the list.
      
      llvm-svn: 67314
      d302bbd0
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Introduce a new expression type, UnresolvedDeclRefExpr, that describes · 90a1a651
      Douglas Gregor authored
      dependent qualified-ids such as
      
        Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
      
      where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
      because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
      declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
      QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
      DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
      
      Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
      specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
      definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
      general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
      it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
      definition.
      
      We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
      template metaprogram.
      
      llvm-svn: 67308
      90a1a651
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Generalize printing of nested-name-specifier sequences for use in both · 18353910
      Douglas Gregor authored
      QualifiedNameType and QualifiedDeclRefExpr. We now keep track of the
      exact nested-name-specifier spelling for a QualifiedDeclRefExpr, and
      use that spelling when printing ASTs. This fixes PR3493.
      
      llvm-svn: 67283
      18353910
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Introduce a representation for types that we referred to via a · 5253768a
      Douglas Gregor authored
      qualified name, e.g., 
      
        foo::x
      
      so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
      code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
      back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
      until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
      
      The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
      is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
      precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
      operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
      of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
       
        ::foo::bar::x
      
      The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
      opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
      component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
      *, bitmangled). 
      
      The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
      NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
      referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
      Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
      actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
      
      Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
      NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
      nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
      dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
      
      llvm-svn: 67265
      5253768a
  2. Mar 18, 2009
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      The scope representation can now be either a DeclContext pointer or a · 6bfde496
      Douglas Gregor authored
      Type pointer. This allows our nested-name-specifiers to retain more
      information about the actual spelling (e.g., which typedef did the
      user name, or what exact template arguments were used in the
      template-id?). It will also allow us to have dependent
      nested-name-specifiers that don't map to any DeclContext.
      
      llvm-svn: 67140
      6bfde496
  3. Mar 15, 2009
  4. Mar 14, 2009
  5. Mar 13, 2009
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Implement template instantiation for several more kinds of expressions: · 0950e41b
      Douglas Gregor authored
        - C++ function casts, e.g., T(foo)
        - sizeof(), alignof()
      
      More importantly, this allows us to verify that we're performing
      overload resolution during template instantiation, with
      argument-dependent lookup and the "cached" results of name lookup from
      the template definition.
      
      llvm-svn: 66947
      0950e41b
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Refactor the way we handle operator overloading and template · 1baf54e1
      Douglas Gregor authored
      instantiation for binary operators. This change moves most of the
      operator-overloading code from the parser action ActOnBinOp to a new,
      parser-independent semantic checking routine CreateOverloadedBinOp. 
      
      Of particular importance is the fact that CreateOverloadedBinOp does
      *not* perform any name lookup based on the current parsing context (it
      doesn't take a Scope*), since it has to be usable during template
      instantiation, when there is no scope information. Rather, it takes a
      pre-computed set of functions that are visible from the context or via
      argument-dependent lookup, and adds to that set any member operators
      and built-in operator candidates. The set of functions is computed in
      the parser action ActOnBinOp based on the current context (both
      operator name lookup and argument-dependent lookup). Within a
      template, the set computed by ActOnBinOp is saved within the
      type-dependent AST node and is augmented with the results of
      argument-dependent name lookup at instantiation time (see
      TemplateExprInstantiator::VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr).
      
      Sadly, we can't fully test this yet. I'll follow up with template
      instantiation for sizeof so that the real fun can begin.
      
      llvm-svn: 66923
      1baf54e1
    • Steve Naroff's avatar
      Fix <rdar://problem/6675489> BlockDecl should not use llvm::smallvector. · c4b30e59
      Steve Naroff authored
      Also changed BlockDecl API to be more consistent (wrt FunctionDecl).
      
      llvm-svn: 66904
      c4b30e59
    • Steve Naroff's avatar
      Reimplement fix for <rdar://problem/6451399> problems with labels and blocks. · cfb6cf4c
      Steve Naroff authored
      This solution is much simpler (and doesn't add any per-scope overhead, which concerned Chris). 
      
      The only downside is the LabelMap is now declared in two places (Sema and BlockSemaInfo). My original fix tried to unify the LabelMap in "Scope" (which would support nested functions in general). In any event, this fixes the bug given the current language definition. If/when we decide to support GCC style nested functions, this will need to be tweaked.
      
      llvm-svn: 66896
      cfb6cf4c
    • Steve Naroff's avatar
      Remove ActiveScope (revert... · 846b1ec4
      Steve Naroff authored
      Remove ActiveScope (revert http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=65694 and http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=66741).
      
      Will replace with something better today...
      
      llvm-svn: 66893
      846b1ec4
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Improve the representation of operator expressions like "x + y" within · d2b7ef6e
      Douglas Gregor authored
      C++ templates. In particular, keep track of the overloaded operators
      that are visible from the template definition, so that they can be
      merged with those operators visible via argument-dependent lookup at
      instantiation time. 
      
      Refactored the lookup routines for argument-dependent lookup and for
      operator name lookup, so they can be called without immediately adding
      the results to an overload set.
      
      Instantiation of these expressions is completely wrong. I'll work on
      that next.
      
      llvm-svn: 66851
      d2b7ef6e
  6. Mar 12, 2009
  7. Mar 11, 2009
  8. Mar 10, 2009
  9. Mar 09, 2009
  10. Mar 08, 2009
  11. Mar 07, 2009
  12. Mar 06, 2009
  13. Mar 05, 2009
  14. Mar 04, 2009
  15. Mar 03, 2009
  16. Mar 02, 2009
  17. Feb 28, 2009
  18. Feb 27, 2009
    • Ted Kremenek's avatar
      In BuildAnonymousStructUnionMemberReference, we shouldn't invalidate OpLoc when · e879e15e
      Ted Kremenek authored
      building nested member expressions. This location is used to determine the range
      of the entire expression, and the expression itself already has its location
      inherited from its Base.
      
      This fixes <rdar://problem/6629829>.
      
      llvm-svn: 65650
      e879e15e
    • Eli Friedman's avatar
      Change the AST generated for offsetof a bit so that it looks like a · 988a16b9
      Eli Friedman authored
      normal expression, and change Evaluate and IRGen to evaluate it like a 
      normal expression.  This simplifies the code significantly, and fixes 
      PR3396.
      
      llvm-svn: 65622
      988a16b9
    • Douglas Gregor's avatar
      Create a new TypeNodes.def file that enumerates all of the types, · deaad8cc
      Douglas Gregor authored
      giving them rough classifications (normal types, never-canonical
      types, always-dependent types, abstract type representations) and
      making it far easier to make sure that we've hit all of the cases when
      decoding types. 
      
      Switched some switch() statements on the type class over to using this
      mechanism, and filtering out those things we don't care about. For
      example, CodeGen should never see always-dependent or non-canonical
      types, while debug info generation should never see always-dependent
      types. More switch() statements on the type class need to be moved 
      over to using this approach, so that we'll get warnings when we add a
      new type then fail to account for it somewhere in the compiler.
      
      As part of this, some types have been renamed:
      
        TypeOfExpr -> TypeOfExprType
        FunctionTypeProto -> FunctionProtoType
        FunctionTypeNoProto -> FunctionNoProtoType
      
      There shouldn't be any functionality change...
      
      llvm-svn: 65591
      deaad8cc
Loading