- Jun 12, 2019
-
-
Nikolai Kosjar authored
llvm-svn: 363129
-
Craig Topper authored
The non-masked versions are already in there. I'm having some trouble coming up with a way to test this right now. Most load folding should happen during isel so I'm not sure how to get peephole pass to do it. llvm-svn: 363125
-
Alex Bradbury authored
This test failed since CFI directive support was added in r361320. llvm-svn: 363123
-
Hsiangkai Wang authored
In order to generate correct debug frame information, it needs to generate CFI information in prologue and epilog. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61773 llvm-svn: 363120
-
Hsiangkai Wang authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63124 llvm-svn: 363119
-
Kai Luo authored
llvm-svn: 363118
-
Cameron McInally authored
X86/avx512vl-intrinsics-fast-isel.ll is only partially complete. llvm-svn: 363114
-
Philip Reames authored
The issue is that if we have a loop with multiple predecessors outside the loop, the code was expecting to merge them and only return if equal, but instead returned the first one seen. I have no idea if this actually tripped anywhere. I noticed it by accident when reading the code and have no idea how to go about constructing a test case. llvm-svn: 363112
-
Philip Reames authored
We were only matching RHS being a loop invariant value, not the inverse. Since there's nothing which appears to canonicalize loop invariant values to RHS, this means we missed cases. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63112 llvm-svn: 363108
-
Sanjay Patel authored
We have the related getSplatValue() already in IR (see code just above the proposed addition). But sometimes we only need to know that the value is a splat rather than capture the splatted scalar value. Also, we have an isSplatValue() function already in SDAG. Motivation - recent bugs that would potentially benefit from improved splat analysis in IR: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42174 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63138 llvm-svn: 363106
-
Jinsong Ji authored
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast. I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to unblock buildbot. ==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8 READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0 #0 0x436434f in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet, 8u> const&) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11 #1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3 #2 0x434042d in llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7 #3 0x433eb90 in llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5 #4 0x428b7ea in llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13 #5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27 #6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16 #7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27 #8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865 #9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8 #10 0xa4270f in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22 #11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #12 0x971b69 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69) llvm-svn: 363105
-
- Jun 11, 2019
-
-
Jordan Rupprecht authored
Summary: This splits out a section in the command guide for llvm tools that can be used as replacements for GNU tools. For pages that didn't exist, I added stub pages that can be individually filled in by followup patches. Tested by running `ninja docs-llvm-html` and inspecting locally. Reviewers: jhenderson, MaskRay, grimar, alexshap Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay, grimar Subscribers: smeenai, arphaman, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63014 llvm-svn: 363100
-
Amara Emerson authored
This opcode generates a pointer to the address of the jump table specified by the source operand, which is a jump table index. It will be used in conjunction with an upcoming G_BRJT opcode to support jump table codegen with GlobalISel. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63111 llvm-svn: 363096
-
Alina Sbirlea authored
Summary: After applying a set of insert updates, there may be trivial Phis left over. Clean them up. Reviewers: george.burgess.iv Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63033 llvm-svn: 363094
-
Cameron McInally authored
[NFC][CodeGen] Add unary FNeg tests to X86/combine-fcopysign.ll X86/dag-fmf-cse.ll X86/fast-isel-fneg.ll X86/fdiv.ll llvm-svn: 363093
-
Alina Sbirlea authored
Summary: The method `getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses` should not mark MemorySSA as preserved, because it's being called in a lot of passes that do not preserve MemorySSA. Instead, mark the MemorySSA analysis as preserved by each pass that does preserve it. These changes only affect the new pass mananger. Reviewers: chandlerc Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62536 llvm-svn: 363091
-
Amy Huang authored
Summary: Deduplicate S_CONSTANTS when linking, if they have the same value. Reviewers: rnk Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63151 llvm-svn: 363089
-
Jinsong Ji authored
Implement necessary target hooks to enable MachinePipeliner for P9 only. The pass is off by default, can be enabled with -ppc-enable-pipeliner for P9. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62164 llvm-svn: 363085
-
Cameron McInally authored
llvm-svn: 363084
-
Jonas Devlieghere authored
When moving a temp file, explicitly set the file descriptor to -1 so we can never accidentally close the moved-from TempFile. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63087 llvm-svn: 363083
-
Cameron McInally authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62612 llvm-svn: 363082
-
James Henderson authored
llvm-svn: 363081
-
Cameron McInally authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62629 llvm-svn: 363080
-
Sander de Smalen authored
Replacing '.. code-block:: llvm' by '::' is a quick fix to the build warning/error: Could not lex literal_block as "llvm". llvm-svn: 363079
-
Nico Weber authored
Users are exepcted to pass all .res files to the linker, which then merges all the resource in all .res files into a tree structure and then converts the final tree structure to a .obj file with .rsrc$01 and .rsrc$02 sections and then links that. If the user instead passes several .obj files containing such resources, the correct thing to do would be to have custom code to merge the trees in the resource sections instead of doing normal section merging -- but link.exe rejects if multiple resource obj files are passed in with LNK4078, so let lld-link do that too instead of silently writing broken .rsrc sections in that case. The only real way to run into this is if users manually convert .res files to .obj files by running cvtres and then handing the resulting .obj files to lld-link instead, which in practice likely never happens. (lld-link is slightly stricter than link.exe now: If link.exe is passed one .obj file created by cvtres, and a .res file, for some reason it just emits a warning instead of an error and outputs strange looking data. lld-link now errors out on mixed input like this.) One way users could accidentally run into this is the following scenario: If a .res file is passed to lib.exe, then lib.exe calls cvtres.exe on the .res file before putting it in the output .lib. (llvm-lib currently doesn't do this.) link.exe's /wholearchive seems to only add obj files referenced from the static library index, but lld-link current really adds all files in the archive. So if lld-link /wholearchive is used with .lib files produced by lib.exe and .res files were among the files handed to lib.exe, we previously silently produced invalid output, but now we error out. link.exe's /wholearchive semantics on the other hand mean that it wouldn't load the resource object files from the .lib file at all. Since this scenario is probably still an unlikely corner case, the difference in behavior here seems fine -- and lld-link might have to change to use link.exe's /wholearchive semantics in the future anyways. Vaguely related to PR42180. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63109 llvm-svn: 363078
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
llvm-svn: 363077
-
James Henderson authored
llvm-svn: 363073
-
James Henderson authored
There was a typo in the --ignore-case help text that was copied into the llvm-dwarfdump command-guide. Additionally, this patch simplifies the wording, since it was unnecessarily verbose: the switch applies for searching in general and doesn't need explicitly stating different search modes (which might go out-of-date as options are added or removed). Reviwed by: JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63133 llvm-svn: 363066
-
James Henderson authored
llvm-nm reads a.out NOT stdin when no input file is specified. This patch fixes the doc accordingly, and rephrases the surrounding sentence slightly. Reviewed by: grimar Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63135 llvm-svn: 363065
-
Ilya Biryukov authored
llvm-svn: 363063
-
Lewis Revill authored
This patch allows lowering of PIC addresses by using PC-relative addressing for DSO-local symbols and accessing the address through the global offset table for non-DSO-local symbols. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55303 llvm-svn: 363058
-
Lewis Revill authored
llvm-svn: 363057
-
Lewis Revill authored
This validates and lowers arguments to inline asm nodes which have the constraints I, J & K, with the following semantics (equivalent to GCC): I: Any 12-bit signed immediate. J: Immediate integer zero only. K: Any 5-bit unsigned immediate. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54093 llvm-svn: 363054
-
Mikhail Maltsev authored
This introduces a new decoding table for MVE instructions, and starts by adding the family of scalar shift instructions that are part of the MVE architecture extension: saturating shifts within a single GPR, and long shifts across a pair of GPRs (both saturating and normal). Some of these shift instructions have only 3-bit register fields in the encoding, with the low bit fixed. So they can only address an odd or even numbered GPR (depending on the operand), and therefore I add two new register classes, GPREven and GPROdd. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62668 Change-Id: Iad95d5f83d26aef70c674027a184a6b1e0098d33 llvm-svn: 363051
-
Nico Weber authored
For lld, pass in Config->Timestamp (which is set based on lld's /timestamp: and /Brepro flags). Since the writeWindowsResourceCOFF() data is only used in-memory by LLD and the obj's timestamp isn't used for anything in the output, this doesn't change behavior. For llvm-cvtres, add an optional /timestamp: parameter, and use the current behavior of calling time() if the parameter is not passed in. This doesn't really change observable behavior (unless someone passes /timestamp: to llvm-cvtres, which wasn't possible before), but it removes the last unqualified call to time() from llvm/lib, which seems like a good thing. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63116 llvm-svn: 363050
-
David Bolvansky authored
llvm-svn: 363049
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
As suggested by @arsenm on D63075 - this adds a TargetLowering::allowsMemoryAccess wrapper that takes a Load/Store node's MachineMemOperand to handle the AddressSpace/Alignment arguments and will also implicitly handle the MachineMemOperand::Flags change in D63075. llvm-svn: 363048
-
Orlando Cazalet-Hyams authored
[DebugInfo@O2][LoopVectorize] pr39024: Vectorized code linenos step through loop even after completion Summary: Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024 The bug reports that a vectorized loop is stepped through 4 times and each step through the loop seemed to show a different path. I found two problems here: A) An incorrect line number on a preheader block (for.body.preheader) instruction causes a step into the loop before it begins. B) Instructions in the middle block have different line numbers which give the impression of another iteration. In this patch I give all of the middle block instructions the line number of the scalar loop latch terminator branch. This seems to provide the smoothest debugging experience because the vectorized loops will always end on this line before dropping into the scalar loop. To solve problem A I have altered llvm::SplitBlockPredecessors to accommodate loop header blocks. I have set up a separate review D61933 for a fix which is required for this patch. Reviewers: samsonov, vsk, aprantl, probinson, anemet, hfinkel, jmorse Reviewed By: hfinkel, jmorse Subscribers: jmorse, javed.absar, eraman, kcc, bjope, jmellorcrummey, hfinkel, gbedwell, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm, #debug-info Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60831 llvm-svn: 363046
-
George Rimar authored
Now we can remove the "TODO" since https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42216 was fixed. llvm-svn: 363045
-
James Henderson authored
-o is in the documentation, but not in the llvm-dwarfdump help text. This patch adds it by inverting the -o and --out-file aliasing. It also removes --out-file from the documentation, since we don't really want people to be using this switch in practice. Reviewed by: aprantl, JDevlieghere, dblaikie Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63013 llvm-svn: 363044
-