Summary:
1. \t => '  '
2. test commit access

Reviewers: Higuoxing, liangdzou

Reviewed By: Higuoxing, liangdzou

Subscribers: kristina, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59243

llvm-svn: 355924

The code might intend to replace puts("") with putchar('\n') even if the
return value is used. It failed because use_empty() was used to guard
the whole block. While returning '\n' (putchar('\n')) is technically
correct (puts is only required to return a nonnegative number on
success), doing this looks weird and there is really little benefit to
optimize puts whose return value is used. So don't do that.

llvm-svn: 355921

Revert rL355906: [SLP] Remove redundancy of performing operand reordering twice: once in buildTree() and later in vectorizeTree().

This is a refactoring patch that removes the redundancy of performing operand reordering twice, once in buildTree() and later in vectorizeTree().
To achieve this we need to keep track of the operands within the TreeEntry struct while building the tree, and later in vectorizeTree() we are just accessing them from the TreeEntry in the right order.

This patch is the first in a series of patches that will allow for better operand reordering across chains of instructions (e.g., a chain of ADDs), as presented here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIEn34LvyNo

Patch by: @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59059
........

Reverted due to buildbot failures that I don't have time to track down.

llvm-svn: 355913

llvm-svn: 355912

[SLP] Remove redundancy of performing operand reordering twice: once in buildTree() and later in vectorizeTree().

This is a refactoring patch that removes the redundancy of performing operand reordering twice, once in buildTree() and later in vectorizeTree().
To achieve this we need to keep track of the operands within the TreeEntry struct while building the tree, and later in vectorizeTree() we are just accessing them from the TreeEntry in the right order.

This patch is the first in a series of patches that will allow for better operand reordering across chains of instructions (e.g., a chain of ADDs), as presented here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIEn34LvyNo

Patch by: @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59059

llvm-svn: 355906

llvm-svn: 355905

Typo `we we're` => `we were` in the pass EarlyCSE

Patch by liangdzou (Liang ZOU)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59241

llvm-svn: 355895

Change from original commit: move test (that uses an X86 triple) into the X86
subdirectory.

Original description:
Gating vectorizing reductions on *all* fastmath flags seems unnecessary;
`reassoc` should be sufficient.

Reviewers: tvvikram, mkuper, kristof.beyls, sdesmalen, Ayal

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Subscribers: dcaballe, huntergr, jmolloy, mcrosier, jlebar, bixia, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57728

llvm-svn: 355889

This reverts commit r355868.  Breaks hexagon.

llvm-svn: 355873

Summary:
Gating vectorizing reductions on *all* fastmath flags seems unnecessary;
`reassoc` should be sufficient.

Reviewers: tvvikram, mkuper, kristof.beyls, sdesmalen, Ayal

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Subscribers: dcaballe, huntergr, jmolloy, mcrosier, jlebar, bixia, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57728

llvm-svn: 355868

It hasn't seen active development in years, and it hasn't reached a
state where it was useful.

Remove the code until someone is interested in working on it again.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59133

llvm-svn: 355862

Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D59069.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40979 describes a bug in which the
-coro-split pass would assert that a use was across a suspend point from
a definition. Normally this would mean that a value would "spill" across
a suspend point and thus need to be stored in the coroutine frame. However,
in this case the use was unreachable, and so it would not be necessary
to store the definition on the frame.

To prevent the assert, simply remove unreachable basic blocks from a
coroutine function before computing spills. This avoids the assert
reported in PR40979.

Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103

Reviewed By: GorNishanov

Subscribers: EricWF, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, lewissbaker

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59068

llvm-svn: 355852

Summary:
Extract the functionality of eliminating unreachable basic blocks
within a function, previously encapsulated within the
-unreachableblockelim pass, and make it available as a function within
BlockUtils.h. No functional change intended other than making the logic
reusable.

Exposing this logic makes it easier to implement
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59068, which fixes coroutines bug
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40979.

Reviewers: mkazantsev, wmi, davidxl, silvas, davide

Reviewed By: davide

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59069

llvm-svn: 355846

Fixes bug 38023: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38023

The SimplifyCFG pass will perform jump threading in some cases where
doing so is trivial and would simplify the CFG. When folding a series
of blocks with redundant conditional branches into an unconditional "critical
edge" block, it does not keep the debug location associated with the previous
conditional branch.

This patch fixes the bug described by copying the debug info from the
old conditional branch to the new unconditional branch instruction, and
adds a regression test for the SimplifyCFG pass that covers this case.

Patch by Stephen Tozer!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59206

llvm-svn: 355833

Fixes bug 37966: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37966

The Jump Threading pass will replace certain conditional branch
instructions with unconditional branches when it can prove that only one
branch can occur. Prior to this patch, it would not carry the debug
info from the old instruction to the new one.

This patch fixes the bug described by copying the debug info from the
conditional branch instruction to the new unconditional branch
instruction, and adds a regression test for the Jump Threading pass that
covers this case.

Patch by Stephen Tozer!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58963

llvm-svn: 355822

Summary:
Right now, when we encounter a string equality check,
e.g. `if (memcmp(a, b, s) == 0)`, we try to expand to a comparison if `s` is a
small compile-time constant, and fall back on calling `memcmp()` else.

This is sub-optimal because memcmp has to compute much more than
equality.

This patch replaces `memcmp(a, b, s) == 0` by `bcmp(a, b, s) == 0` on platforms
that support `bcmp`.

`bcmp` can be made much more efficient than `memcmp` because equality
compare is trivially parallel while lexicographic ordering has a chain
dependency.

Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jyknight, ckennelly, gchatelet, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56593

llvm-svn: 355672

In some loops, we end up generating loop induction variables that look like:
  {(-1 * (zext i16 (%i0 * %i1) to i32))<nsw>,+,1}
As opposed to the simpler:
  {(zext i16 (%i0 * %i1) to i32),+,-1}
i.e we count up from -limit to 0, not the simpler counting down from limit to
0. This is because the scores, as LSR calculates them, are the same and the
second is filtered in place of the first. We end up with a redundant SUB from 0
in the code.

This patch tries to make the calculation of the setup cost a little more
thoroughly, recursing into the scev members to better approximate the setup
required. The cost function for comparing LSR costs is:

return std::tie(C1.NumRegs, C1.AddRecCost, C1.NumIVMuls, C1.NumBaseAdds,
                C1.ScaleCost, C1.ImmCost, C1.SetupCost) <
       std::tie(C2.NumRegs, C2.AddRecCost, C2.NumIVMuls, C2.NumBaseAdds,
                C2.ScaleCost, C2.ImmCost, C2.SetupCost);
So this will only alter results if none of the other variables turn out to be
different.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58770

llvm-svn: 355597

llvm-svn: 355583

Summary:
While implementing inlining support for callbr
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40722), I hit a crash in Loop
Rotation when trying to build the entire x86 Linux kernel
(drivers/char/random.c). This is a small fix up to r353563.

Test case is drivers/char/random.c (with callbr's inlined), then ran
through creduce, then `opt -opt-bisect-limit=<limit>`, then bugpoint.

Thanks to Craig Topper for immediately spotting the fix, and teaching me
how to fish.

Reviewers: craig.topper, jyknight

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58929

llvm-svn: 355564

Fold `add nsw` and `sadd.with.overflow` with constants if the addition
does not overflow.

Part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38146.

Patch by Dan Robertson.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58881

llvm-svn: 355530

Summary:
They simply shuffle bits. MSan needs to do the same with shadow bits,
after making sure that the shuffle mask is fully initialized.

Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka

Subscribers: hiraditya, #sanitizers, llvm-commits

Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58858

llvm-svn: 355348

llvm-svn: 355346

I'm not too familiar with this pass, so there might be a better
solution, but this appears to fix the degenerate:
PR40930
PR40931
PR40932
PR40934
...without affecting any real-world code.

As we've seen in several other passes, when we have unreachable blocks,
they can contain semi-bogus IR and/or cause unexpected conditions. We
would not typically expect these patterns to make it this far, but we
have to guard against them anyway.

llvm-svn: 355337

Part 3 of CSPGO changes (mostly related to PassMananger).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175

llvm-svn: 355330

Fixes PR40838.

llvm-svn: 355301

Follow-up to rL355221.
This isn't specifically called for within PR14613,
but we'll get there eventually if it's not already
requested in some other bug report.

https://rise4fun.com/Alive/5b0

  Name: smax
  Pre: WillNotOverflowSignedSub(C1,C0)
  %a = add nsw i8 %x, C0
  %cond = icmp sgt i8 %a, C1
  %r = select i1 %cond, i8 %a, i8 C1
  =>
  %c2 = icmp sgt i8 %x, C1-C0
  %u2 = select i1 %c2, i8 %x, i8 C1-C0
  %r = add nsw i8 %u2, C0

  Name: smin
  Pre: WillNotOverflowSignedSub(C1,C0)
  %a = add nsw i32 %x, C0
  %cond = icmp slt i32 %a, C1
  %r = select i1 %cond, i32 %a, i32 C1
  =>
  %c2 = icmp slt i32 %x, C1-C0
  %u2 = select i1 %c2, i32 %x, i32 C1-C0
  %r = add nsw i32 %u2, C0

llvm-svn: 355272

I'm assuming that the nan propogation logic for InstructonSimplify's handling of fadd and fsub is correct, and applying the same to atomicrmw.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58836

llvm-svn: 355222

In the motivating cases from PR14613:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
...moving the add enables us to narrow the
min/max which eliminates zext/trunc which
enables signficantly better vectorization.
But that bug is still not completely fixed.

https://rise4fun.com/Alive/5KQ

  Name: umax
  Pre: C1 u>= C0
  %a = add nuw i8 %x, C0
  %cond = icmp ugt i8 %a, C1
  %r = select i1 %cond, i8 %a, i8 C1
  =>
  %c2 = icmp ugt i8 %x, C1-C0
  %u2 = select i1 %c2, i8 %x, i8 C1-C0
  %r = add nuw i8 %u2, C0

  Name: umin
  Pre: C1 u>= C0
  %a = add nuw i32 %x, C0
  %cond = icmp ult i32 %a, C1
  %r = select i1 %cond, i32 %a, i32 C1
  =>
  %c2 = icmp ult i32 %x, C1-C0
  %u2 = select i1 %c2, i32 %x, i32 C1-C0
  %r = add nuw i32 %u2, C0

llvm-svn: 355221

This patch fixes an issue where we would compute an unnecessarily small alignment during scalar promotion when no store is not to be guaranteed to execute, but we've proven load speculation safety. Since speculating a load requires proving the existing alignment is valid at the new location (see Loads.cpp), we can use the alignment fact from the load.

For non-atomics, this is a performance problem. For atomics, this is a correctness issue, though an *incredibly* rare one to see in practice. For atomics, we might not be able to lower an improperly aligned load or store (i.e. i32 align 1). If such an instruction makes it all the way to codegen, we *may* fail to codegen the operation, or we may simply generate a slow call to a library function. The part that makes this super hard to see in practice is that the memory location actually *is* well aligned, and instcombine knows that. So, to see a failure, you have to have a) hit the bug in LICM, b) somehow hit a depth limit in InstCombine/ValueTracking to avoid fixing the alignment, and c) then have generated an instruction which fails codegen rather than simply emitting a slow libcall. All around, pretty hard to hit.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58809

llvm-svn: 355217

An idempotent atomicrmw is one that does not change memory in the process of execution.  We have already added handling for the various integer operations; this patch extends the same handling to floating point operations which were recently added to IR.

Note: At the moment, we canonicalize idempotent fsub to fadd when ordering requirements prevent us from using a load.  As discussed in the review, I will be replacing this with canonicalizing both floating point ops to integer ops in the near future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58251

llvm-svn: 355210

GCC correctly moans that PlainCFGBuilder::isExternalDef(llvm::Value*) and
StackSafetyDataFlowAnalysis::verifyFixedPoint() are defined but not used
in Release builds. Hide them behind 'ifndef NDEBUG'.

llvm-svn: 355205

By including the header file in the source.

llvm-svn: 355202

[ConstantHoisting] Call cleanup() in ConstantHoistingPass::runImpl to avoid dangling elements in ConstIntInfoVec for new PM

Summary:
ConstIntInfoVec contains elements extracted from the previous function.
In new PM, releaseMemory() is not called and the dangling elements can
cause segfault in findConstantInsertionPoint.

Rename releaseMemory() to cleanup() to deliver the idea that it is
mandatory and call cleanup() in ConstantHoistingPass::runImpl to fix
this.

Reviewers: ormris, zzheng, dmgreen, wmi

Reviewed By: ormris, wmi

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58589

llvm-svn: 355174

Summary:
These sorts of blocks often contain calls to noreturn functions, like
longjmp, throw, or trap. If they don't end the program, they are
"interesting" from the perspective of sanitizer coverage, so we should
instrument them. This was discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57982.

Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka

Subscribers: llvm-commits, craig.topper, efriedma, morehouse, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58740

llvm-svn: 355152

The basic idea of the pass is to use a circular buffer to log the execution ordering of the functions. We only log the function when it is first executed. We use a 8-byte hash to log the function symbol name.

In this pass, we add three global variables:
(1) an order file buffer: a circular buffer at its own llvm section.
(2) a bitmap for each module: one byte for each function to say if the function is already executed.
(3) a global index to the order file buffer.

At the function prologue, if the function has not been executed (by checking the bitmap), log the function hash, then atomically increase the index.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57463

llvm-svn: 355133

Part 2 of CSPGO changes (mostly related to ProfileSummary).
Note that I use a default parameter in setProfileSummary() and getSummary().
This is to break the dependency in clang. I will make the parameter explicit
after changing clang in a separated patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175

llvm-svn: 355131

This is part of a transform that may be done in the backend:
D13757
...but it should always be beneficial to fold this sooner in IR
for all targets.

https://rise4fun.com/Alive/vaiW

  Name: sext add nsw
  %add = add nsw i8 %i, C0
  %ext = sext i8 %add to i32
  %r = add i32 %ext, C1
  =>
  %s = sext i8 %i to i32
  %r = add i32 %s, sext(C0)+C1

  Name: zext add nuw
  %add = add nuw i8 %i, C0
  %ext = zext i8 %add to i16
  %r = add i16 %ext, C1
  =>
  %s = zext i8 %i to i16
  %r = add i16 %s, zext(C0)+C1

llvm-svn: 355118

Summary:
It is mentioned in the document of DTU that "It is illegal to submit any update that has already been submitted, i.e., you are supposed not to insert an existent edge or delete a nonexistent edge." It is dangerous to violet this rule because DomTree and PostDomTree occasionally crash on this scenario.

This patch fixes `MergeBlockIntoPredecessor`, making it conformant to this precondition.

Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, chandlerc

Reviewed By: brzycki

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58444

llvm-svn: 355105

Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.

This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650

llvm-svn: 355099

Temporarily revert "ArgumentPromotion should copy all metadata to new Function" and the dependent patch "Refine ArgPromotion metadata handling" as they're causing segfaults in argument promotion.

This reverts commits r354032 and r353537.

llvm-svn: 355060