MaterializationResponsibility.

MaterializationResponsibility objects provide a connection between a
materialization process (compiler, jit linker, etc.) and the JIT state held in
the ExecutionSession and JITDylib objects. Switching to shared ownership
extends the lifetime of JITDylibs to ensure they remain accessible until all
materializers targeting them have completed. This will allow (in a follow-up
patch) JITDylibs to be removed from the ExecutionSession and placed in a
pending-destruction state while they are kept alive to communicate errors
to/from any still-runnning materialization processes. The intent is to enable
JITDylibs to be safely removed even if they have running compiles targeting
them.

Defaulting to -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' makes .gcno/.gcda
compatible with gcov [4.7,8)

In addition, delete clang::CodeGenOptionsBase::CoverageExtraChecksum and GCOVOptions::UseCfgChecksum.
We can infer the information from the version.

With this change, .gcda files produced by `clang --coverage a.o` linked executable can be read by gcov 4.7~7.
We don't need other -Xclang -coverage* options.
There may be a mismatching version warning, though.

(Note, GCC r173147 "split checksum into cfg checksum and line checksum"
 made gcov 4.7 incompatible with previous versions.)

Commit 1e68724d removed the alignment
argument from the memset intrinsic. Update the BrainF example to match.

Reviewed By: jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79601

Objective-C++11 and under MS extensions.

This matches the MSVC behavior, and means that Objective-C behaves as a
set of extensions to the base language, rather than replacing the base
language rule with a different one.

This fixes an accidental breakage of exporting symbols using def
files, when the symbol name contains a period, since commit
0ca06f79, mixing up a symbol name containing a period with
the case of exporting a symbol as a forward to another dll.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79619

The 'class' or 'struct' keyword is only permitted as part of either an
enum definition or a standalone opaque-enum-declaration, not as part of
an elaborated type specifier. We previously failed to diagnose this, and
generally didn't properly implement the restrictions on elaborated type
specifiers for enumeration types.

In passing, also fixed incorrect parsing for enum-bases, which we
previously parsed as a type-name, but are actually a type-specifier-seq.
This matters for cases like 'enum E : int *p;', which is valid as a
Microsoft extension.

Plus some minor parse diagnostic improvements.

Bumped the recently-added ExtWarn for 'enum E : int x;' to be
DefaultError; this is not an intentional extension, so producing an
error by default seems appropriate, but the warning flag to disable it
may still be useful for code written against old Clang. The same
treatment is given here to the diagnostic for 'enum class E x;', which
we similarly have incorrectly accepted for many years. These diagnostics
continue to be suppressed under -fms-extensions and when compiling
Objective-C code. We will need to decide separately whether Objective-C
should follow the C++ rules or the (older) MSVC rules.

rL144865 incorrectly wrote function names for GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION
(this might be part of the reasons the header says
"We emit files in a corrupt version of GCOV's "gcda" file format").

rL176173 and rL177475 realized the problem and introduced -coverage-no-function-names-in-data
to work around the issue. (However, the description is wrong.
libgcov never writes function names, even before GCC 4.2).

In reality, the linker command line has to look like:

clang --coverage -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' -Xclang -coverage-cfg-checksum -Xclang -coverage-no-function-names-in-data

Failing to pass -coverage-no-function-names-in-data can make gcov 4.7~7
either produce wrong results (for one gcov-4.9 program, I see "No executable lines")
or segfault (gcov-7).
(gcov-8 uses an incompatible format.)

This patch deletes -coverage-no-function-names-in-data and the related
function names support from libclang_rt.profile

Mostly found by asserting on tests that have undef operands. I'm
sure this isn't an exhaustive list.

Summary:
The assume builder was non-deterministic when working on unamed values.
this patch fixes this.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, mgrang, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78616

This fixes a bug reported by Alex Renda on LLVMDev where mca did not correctly
mark a resource group as "reserved".
(See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141485.html).

The issue was caused by a wrong check in function `initializeUsedResources`.
As a consequence of this, a resource group was left unreserved, and its field
`NumUnits` incorrectly reported an unrealistic number of consumed resource
units.

This patch fixes the issue with the handling of reserved resources in the
InstrBuilder class, and adds a simple test for it.  Ideally, as suggested by
Andy Trick, most of these problems will disappear if in the future we will
introduce a (optional) DelayCycles vector for SchedWriteRes.

This is needed to make 5a9b792d "[gcov] Temporarily unsupport host-byteorder-big-endian"
work.

llvm-cov gcov does not support host-byteorder-big-endian yet.

Summary: with this patch the assume salvageKnowledge will not generate assume if all knowledge is already available in an assume with valid context. assume bulider can also in some cases update an existing assume with better information.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78014

Even a 2003 version of gcov_read_string does not have the behavior
described by rL204881. The wrong impression might come from
libclang_rt.profile (GCDAProfiling.c)'s corrupted output (since the
initial import rL144865). Note, the corrupted output crashes gcov.

GCDAProfiling.c unnecessarily writes function names to .gcda files.
GCC 4.2 gcc/libgcov.c (now renamed to libgcc/libgcov*) did not write function
names. gcov-7 (compatible) crashes on .gcda produced by libclang_rt.profile
rL176173 realized the problem and introduced a mode to remove function
names.

llvm-cov code apparently takes GCDAProfiling.c output format as truth
and tries to decode function names.  Additionally, llvm-cov tries to
decode tags in certain order which does not match libgcov emitted .gcda
files.

This patch fixes the .gcda decoder and makes it work with GCC 8 and 9
(10 is compatible with 9). Note, line statistics are broken and not
fixed by this patch.

Add test/tools/llvm-cov/gcov-{4.7,8,9}.c to test compatibility.

Currently LAA's uses of ScalarEvolutionExpander blocks moving the
expander from Analysis to Transforms. Conceptually the expander does not
fit into Analysis (it is only used for code generation) and
runtime-check generation also seems to be better suited as a
transformation utility.

Reviewers: Ayal, anemet

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78460

We have a transform in the opposite direction only for the x86 MMX type,
Other types are not handled either way before this patch.

The motivating case from PR45748:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
...is the last test diff. In that example, we are triggering an existing
bitcast transform, so we reduce the number of casts, and that should give
us the ideal x86 codegen.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79171

This test would break with the proposed change to IR canonicalization
in D79171.

The test tried to do the right thing by only using -mem2reg with opt,
but it was using -O3 before that step, so the opt part was meaningless.

This test would break with the proposed change to IR canonicalization
in D79171. The raw unoptimized IR from clang is massive, so I've
replaced -instcombine with -mem2reg to make it more manageable,
but still be unlikely to break with unrelated changed to optimization.

Fold or(zext(bitreverse(x)),shl(zext(bitreverse(y)),bw/2) -> bitreverse(or(zext(x),shl(zext(y),bw/2))

Practically this is the same as the BSWAP pattern so we might as well handle it.

The failing assertion has been fixed and the problematic test case has
been added.

This reverts the revert commit fc44617f.

Exposes implicit dependency in ModuleSymbolTable.h - added missing Module forward declaration.

We have to include LegacyPassManagers.h where its defined.

This reverts commit c28114c8.

This causes some bots to fail:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/builds/30596/steps/build%20android%2Faarch64/logs/stdio

Functions checking whether an SSA value is a valid dimension or symbol for
affine operations can be called on values defined in a detached region (a
region that is not yet attached to an operation), for example, during parsing
or operation construction. These functions will attempt to uncondtionally
dereference a pointer to the parent operation of a region, which may be null
(as fixed by the previous commit, uninitialized before that). Since one cannot
know to which operation a region will be attached, conservatively this
operation would not be a valid affine scope and act accordingly, instead of
crashing.

Region has a default constructor that is called when a region is constructed
while an operation is being created, and therefore before the region can be
attached to this operation. The `container` field is uninitialized, which makes
it impossible to check programmatically if a Region is attached to an operation
or not, leading to sly memory errors when this field is read. Initialize it to
nullptr by default and thus make sure one can check if a region is attached to
an operation or not.

In order to reduce the API surface area (preparation for D78460), remove
a addRuntimeChecks() function and do the additional check in the single
caller.

Reviewers: Ayal, anemet

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79679

We can combine a floating-point extension cast with a conversion
from integer if we know the earlier cast is exact.

This is an optimization suggested in PR36617:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36617#c19

However, this patch does not change the example suggested there.
This patch only uses the existing analysis to handle cases where
the integer source value magnitude is narrower than the
intermediate FP mantissa (guarantees that the conversion to FP is
exact). Follow-up patches to the analysis function can enable
more cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79116

Summary:
PCH format is unstable, hence using a preamble built with a different
version of clang (or even worse, a different compiler) might result in
unexpected behaviour.

PCH creation on the other hand is something clangd wouldn't want to perform, as
it doesn't generate any output files.

This patch makes sure clangd drops any PCH related compile commands after
parsing the command line args.

Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/248

Reviewers: sammccall

Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79669