llvm-svn: 353799

`CallBase`.

Users have been updated. You can see how to update any out-of-tree
usages: pass `cast<CallBase>(CS.getInstruction())`.

llvm-svn: 353661

`CallBase` class rather than `CallSite` wrappers.

I pushed this change down through most of the statepoint infrastructure,
completely removing the use of CallSite where I could reasonably do so.
I ended up making a couple of cut-points: generic call handling
(instcombine, TLI, SDAG). As soon as it hit truly generic handling with
users outside the immediate code, I simply transitioned into or out of
a `CallSite` to make this a reasonable sized chunk.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56122

llvm-svn: 353660

isInstructionTriviallyDead also performs the use_empty() check.

llvm-svn: 353637

This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html

This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.

This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.

There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.

Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765

llvm-svn: 353563

When CodeExtractor saves the result of InvokeInst at the first insertion
point of the 'normal destination' basic block, this block can be omitted
in the outlined region, so store is placed outside of the function. The
suggested solution is to process saving outputs after creating exit
stubs for new function, and stores will be placed in that blocks before
return in this case.

Patch by Sergei Kachkov!

Fixes llvm.org/PR40455.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57919

llvm-svn: 353562

Check that when SimplifyCFG is flattening a 'br', all their debug intrinsic instructions are removed, including any dbg.label referencing a label associated with the basic blocks being removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57444

llvm-svn: 353511

Summary: Assumption cache's self-updating mechanism does not correctly handle the case when blocks are extracted from the function by the CodeExtractor. As a result function's assumption cache may have stale references to the llvm.assume calls that were moved to the outlined function. This patch fixes this problem by removing extracted llvm.assume calls from the function’s assumption cache.

Reviewers: hfinkel, vsk, fhahn, davidxl, sanjoy

Reviewed By: hfinkel, vsk

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57215

llvm-svn: 353500

Summary:
Experimentally we found that promotion to scalars carries less benefits
than sinking and hoisting in LICM. When using MemorySSA, we build an
AliasSetTracker on demand in order to reuse the current infrastructure.
We only build it if less than AccessCapForMSSAPromotion exist in the
loop, a cap that is by default set to 250. This value ensures there are
no runtime regressions, and there are small compile time gains for
pathological cases. A much lower value (20) was found to yield a single
regression in the llvm-test-suite and much higher benefits for compile
times. Conservatively we set the current cap to a high value, but we will
explore lowering it when MemorySSA is enabled by default.

Reviewers: sanjoy, chandlerc

Subscribers: nemanjai, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, jfb, jsji, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56625

llvm-svn: 353339

llvm-svn: 353277

llvm-svn: 353275

llvm-svn: 353274

llvm-svn: 353273

DomTreeUpdater depends on headers from Analysis, but is in IR.  This is a
layering violation since Analysis depends on IR.  Relocate this code from IR
to Analysis to fix the layering violation.

llvm-svn: 353265

Some use cases are appearing where salvaging is needed that does not
correspond to an instruction being deleted -- for example an instruction
being sunk, or a Value not being available in a block being isel'd.

Enable more fine grained control over how salavging occurs by splitting
the logic into helper functions, separating things that are specific to
working on DbgVariableIntrinsics from those specific to interpreting IR
and building DIExpressions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57696

llvm-svn: 353156

LoopVectorize adds llvm.loop.isvectorized, but leaves
llvm.loop.vectorize.enable. Do not consider such a loop for user-forced
vectorization since vectorization already happened -- by prioritizing
llvm.loop.isvectorized except for TM_SuppressedByUser.

Fixes http://llvm.org/PR40546

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57542

llvm-svn: 353082

If there is only a single available value, all uses must be dominated by
the single value and there is no need to search for a reaching
definition.

This drastically speeds up LCSSA in some cases. For the test case
from PR37202, it speeds up LCSSA construction by 4 times.

Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:

    Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)

    ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
    5.2786 ( 17.7%)   0.0021 (  1.2%)   5.2806 ( 17.6%)   5.2808 ( 17.6%)  Unswitch loops
    4.3739 ( 14.7%)   0.0303 ( 18.1%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
    4.2658 ( 14.3%)   0.0192 ( 11.5%)   4.2850 ( 14.3%)   4.2851 ( 14.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
    2.2307 (  7.5%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   2.2320 (  7.5%)   2.2318 (  7.5%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
    2.0888 (  7.0%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   2.0900 (  7.0%)   2.0897 (  7.0%)  Unroll loops
    1.6761 (  5.6%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)  Value Propagation
    1.3686 (  4.6%)   0.0029 (  1.8%)   1.3716 (  4.6%)   1.3714 (  4.6%)  Induction Variable Simplification
    1.1457 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
    1.1384 (  3.8%)   0.0005 (  0.3%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
    1.1360 (  3.8%)   0.0027 (  1.6%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
    1.1331 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1341 (  3.8%)   1.1340 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3

Time passes with this patch

  Total Execution Time: 19.2802 seconds (19.2813 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
   4.4234 ( 23.2%)   0.0038 (  2.0%)   4.4272 ( 23.0%)   4.4273 ( 23.0%)  Unswitch loops
   2.3828 ( 12.5%)   0.0020 (  1.1%)   2.3848 ( 12.4%)   2.3847 ( 12.4%)  Unroll loops
   1.8714 (  9.8%)   0.0020 (  1.1%)   1.8734 (  9.7%)   1.8735 (  9.7%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   1.7973 (  9.4%)   0.0022 (  1.2%)   1.7995 (  9.3%)   1.8003 (  9.3%)  Value Propagation
   1.4010 (  7.3%)   0.0033 (  1.8%)   1.4043 (  7.3%)   1.4044 (  7.3%)  Induction Variable Simplification
   0.9978 (  5.2%)   0.0244 ( 13.1%)   1.0222 (  5.3%)   1.0224 (  5.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   0.9611 (  5.0%)   0.0257 ( 13.8%)   0.9868 (  5.1%)   0.9868 (  5.1%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
   0.5856 (  3.1%)   0.0015 (  0.8%)   0.5871 (  3.0%)   0.5869 (  3.0%)  Unroll loops #2
   0.4132 (  2.2%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   0.4145 (  2.1%)   0.4143 (  2.1%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion #3

Reviewers: efriedma, davide, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57033

llvm-svn: 352960

This assertion makes sure all sub-loops are in LCSSA form before
bringing their parent in LCSSA form. This precondition was added to
formLCSSA in D56848.

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: davide

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56921

llvm-svn: 352958

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57174

llvm-svn: 352914

This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173

llvm-svn: 352913

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172

llvm-svn: 352911

This cleans up all InvokeInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57171

llvm-svn: 352910

This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170

llvm-svn: 352909

Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.

Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.

Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
  take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.

One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.

However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)

Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315

llvm-svn: 352827

This reverts commit f47d6b38 (r352791).

Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.

llvm-svn: 352800

The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.

Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
  take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.

One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.

However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)

Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315

llvm-svn: 352791

Recommit of r352763 with fix for use after free.

llvm-svn: 352770

This reverts commit r352763.

Causing a couple bot failures, root cause pointed to by sanitizer bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/28909/steps/annotate/logs/stdio

Use after free. I understand the issue but will revert and test with fix
before recommitting.

llvm-svn: 352768

Summary:
COFF requires that COMDAT name match that of the leader. When we promote
and rename an internal leader in ThinLTO due to an import, ensure we
subsequently rename the associated COMDAT. Similar to D31963 which did
this during ThinLTO module splitting.

Fixes PR40414.

Reviewers: pcc, inglorion

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, dmajor, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57395

llvm-svn: 352763

Summary:
Check the bool value of the attribute in getOptionalBoolLoopAttribute
not just its existance.
Eliminates the warning noise generated when vectorization is explicitly disabled.

Reviewers: Meinersbur, hfinkel, dmgreen

Subscribers: jlebar, sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57260

llvm-svn: 352555

When passing a `swifterror` argument or alloca as an input to an
extraction region, mark the input parameter `swifterror`.

llvm-svn: 352408

This reverts commit cea84ab9.

llvm-svn: 352069

Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.

Changes:
  # UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
    the `noreturn` attribute from a function
  # ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute

Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return    // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```

The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.

rdar://problem/40723397

Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624

llvm-svn: 352003

Summary:
Profile sample files include the number of times each entry or inlined
call site is sampled. This is translated into the entry count metadta
on functions.

When sample data is being read, if a call site that was inlined
in the sample program is considered cold and not inlined, then
the entry count of the out-of-line functions does not reflect
the current compilation.

In this patch, we note call sites where the function was not inlined
and as a last action of the sample profile loading, we update the
called function's entry count to reflect the calls from these
call sites which are not included in the profile file.

Reviewers: danielcdh, wmi, Kader, modocache

Reviewed By: wmi

Subscribers: davidxl, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52845

llvm-svn: 352001

Summary:
Renamed setBaseDiscriminator to cloneWithBaseDiscriminator, to match
similar APIs. Also changed its behavior to copy over the other
discriminator components, instead of eliding them.

Renamed cloneWithDuplicationFactor to
cloneByMultiplyingDuplicationFactor, which more closely matches what
this API does.

Reviewers: dblaikie, wmi

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Subscribers: zzheng, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56220

llvm-svn: 351996

to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

CodeExtractor permits extracting a region of blocks from a function even
when values defined within the region are used outside of it.

This is typically done by creating an alloca in the original function
and reloading the alloca after a call to the extracted function.

Wrap the reload in lifetime start/end markers to promote stack coloring.

Suggested by Sergei Kachkov!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56045

llvm-svn: 351621

Summary:
Scanning blocks in sub-loops for uses is unnecessary, as they were
already handled while dealing with the containing sub-loop.

This speeds up LCSSA for highly nested loops. For the test case in PR37202, it
halves the time spent in LCSSA. In cases were we won't be able to skip
any blocks, the additional lookup should be negligible.

Time-passes without this patch for test case from PR37202:

  Total Execution Time: 48.5505 seconds (48.5511 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
  10.0822 ( 21.0%)   0.1406 ( 27.0%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  10.2228 ( 21.1%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
  10.0417 ( 20.9%)   0.1467 ( 28.2%)  10.1884 ( 21.0%)  10.1890 ( 21.0%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   4.2703 (  8.9%)   0.0040 (  0.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)   4.2742 (  8.8%)  Unswitch loops
   2.7376 (  5.7%)   0.0229 (  4.4%)   2.7605 (  5.7%)   2.7611 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
   2.7332 (  5.7%)   0.0214 (  4.1%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)   2.7546 (  5.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3
   2.7088 (  5.6%)   0.0230 (  4.4%)   2.7319 (  5.6%)   2.7324 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
   2.6855 (  5.6%)   0.0236 (  4.5%)   2.7091 (  5.6%)   2.7090 (  5.6%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
   2.1648 (  4.5%)   0.0018 (  0.4%)   2.1666 (  4.5%)   2.1664 (  4.5%)  Unroll loops
   1.8371 (  3.8%)   0.0009 (  0.2%)   1.8379 (  3.8%)   1.8380 (  3.8%)  Value Propagation
   1.8149 (  3.8%)   0.0021 (  0.4%)   1.8170 (  3.7%)   1.8169 (  3.7%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   1.6755 (  3.5%)   0.0226 (  4.3%)   1.6981 (  3.5%)   1.6980 (  3.5%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #7

Time-passes with this patch

  Total Execution Time: 29.9285 seconds (29.9276 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  --- Name ---
   5.2786 ( 17.7%)   0.0021 (  1.2%)   5.2806 ( 17.6%)   5.2808 ( 17.6%)  Unswitch loops
   4.3739 ( 14.7%)   0.0303 ( 18.1%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)   4.4042 ( 14.7%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass
   4.2658 ( 14.3%)   0.0192 ( 11.5%)   4.2850 ( 14.3%)   4.2851 ( 14.3%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #2
   2.2307 (  7.5%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   2.2320 (  7.5%)   2.2318 (  7.5%)  Loop Invariant Code Motion
   2.0888 (  7.0%)   0.0012 (  0.7%)   2.0900 (  7.0%)   2.0897 (  7.0%)  Unroll loops
   1.6761 (  5.6%)   0.0013 (  0.8%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)   1.6774 (  5.6%)  Value Propagation
   1.3686 (  4.6%)   0.0029 (  1.8%)   1.3716 (  4.6%)   1.3714 (  4.6%)  Induction Variable Simplification
   1.1457 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)   1.1468 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #4
   1.1384 (  3.8%)   0.0005 (  0.3%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)   1.1389 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #6
   1.1360 (  3.8%)   0.0027 (  1.6%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)   1.1387 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #5
   1.1331 (  3.8%)   0.0010 (  0.6%)   1.1341 (  3.8%)   1.1340 (  3.8%)  Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass #3

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: davide, efriedma

Subscribers: hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56848

llvm-svn: 351567

Essentially, do not treat `call` and `musttail call` as the same thing.

As a drive-by, fold CallInst and InvokeInst handling together using the
CallSite helper.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56815

llvm-svn: 351405

Summary:
Second iteration of D56433 which got reverted in rL350719. The problem
in the previous version was that we dropped the thunk calling the tsan init
function. The new version keeps the thunk which should appease dyld, but is not
actually OK wrt. the current semantics of function passes. Hence, add a
helper to insert the functions only on the first time. The helper
allows hooking into the insertion to be able to append them to the
global ctors list.

Reviewers: chandlerc, vitalybuka, fedor.sergeev, leonardchan

Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56538

llvm-svn: 351314