llvm-svn: 169757

llvm-svn: 169756

The `-mno-red-zone' flag wasn't being propagated to the functions that code
coverage generates. This allowed some of them to use the red zone when that
wasn't allowed.
<rdar://problem/12843084>

llvm-svn: 169754

while (i--)
 sum+=A[i];

llvm-svn: 169752

the assembler. This is useful in order to know how the numbers add up,
since in particular the Align fragments account for a non-trivial
portion of the emitted fragments (especially on -O0 which sets
relax-all).

llvm-svn: 169747

misched used GetUnderlyingObject in order to break false load/store
dependencies, and the -enable-aa-sched-mi feature similarly relied on
GetUnderlyingObject in order to ensure it is safe to use the aliasing analysis.
Unfortunately, GetUnderlyingObject does not recurse through phi nodes, and so
(especially due to LSR) all of these mechanisms failed for
induction-variable-dependent loads and stores inside loops.

This change replaces uses of GetUnderlyingObject with GetUnderlyingObjects
(which will recurse through phi and select instructions) in misched.

Andy reviewed, tested and simplified this patch; Thanks!

llvm-svn: 169744

Accidental commit... git svn betrayed me. Sorry for the noise.

llvm-svn: 169741

Summary:
Not all chips targeted by x86_64 have this feature, but a dramatically
increasing number do. Specifying a chip-specific tuning parameter will
continue to turn the feature on or off as appropriate for that
particular chip, but the generic flag should try to achieve the best
performance on the most widely available hardware. Today, the number of
chips with fast UA access dwarfs those without in the x86-64 space.

Note that this also brings LLVM's code generation for this '-march' flag
more in line with that of modern GCCs.

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D195

llvm-svn: 169740

Thanks to the PaX folks for noticing in review! We need some tests here,
any sugestions welcome...

llvm-svn: 169739

Intel chips.

The model number rules were determined by inspecting Intel's
documentation for their newer chip model numbers. My understanding is
that all of the newer Intel chips have fast unaligned memory access, but
if anyone is concerned about a particular chip, just shout.

No tests updated; it's not clear we have dedicated tests for the chips'
various features, but if anyone would like tests (or can point me at
some existing ones), I'm happy to oblige.

llvm-svn: 169730

This visitor provides infrastructure for recursively traversing the
use-graph of a pointer-producing instruction like an alloca or a malloc.
It maintains a worklist of uses to visit, so it can handle very deep
recursions. It automatically looks through instructions which simply
translate one pointer to another (bitcasts and GEPs). It tracks the
offset relative to the original pointer as long as that offset remains
constant and exposes it during the visit as an APInt offset. Finally, it
performs conservative escape analysis.

However, currently it has some limitations that should be addressed
going forward:
1) It doesn't handle vectors of pointers.
2) It doesn't provide a cheaper visitor when the constant offset
   tracking isn't needed.
3) It doesn't support non-instruction pointer values.

The current functionality is exactly what is required to implement the
SROA pointer-use visitors in terms of this one, rather than in terms of
their own ad-hoc base visitor, which was always very poorly specified.
SROA has been converted to use this, and the code there deleted which
this utility now provides.

Technically speaking, using this new visitor allows SROA to handle a few
more cases than it previously did. It is now more aggressive in ignoring
chains of instructions which look like they would defeat SROA, but in
fact do not because they never result in a read or write of memory.
While this is "neat", it shouldn't be interesting for real programs as
any such chains should have been removed by others passes long before we
get to SROA. As a consequence, I've not added any tests for these
features -- it shouldn't be part of SROA's contract to perform such
heroics.

The goal is to extend the functionality of this visitor going forward,
and re-use it from passes like ASan that can benefit from doing
a detailed walk of the uses of a pointer.

Thanks to Ben Kramer for the code review rounds and lots of help
reviewing and debugging this patch.

llvm-svn: 169728

llvm-svn: 169727

llvm-svn: 169724

When SROA was evaluating a mixture of i1 and i8 loads and stores, in
just a particular case, it would tickle a latent bug where we compared
bits to bytes rather than bits to bits. As a consequence of the latent
bug, we would allow integers through which were not byte-size multiples,
a situation the later rewriting code was never intended to handle.

In release builds this could trigger all manner of oddities, but the
reported issue in PR14548 was forming invalid bitcast instructions.

The only downside of this fix is that it makes it more clear that SROA
in its current form is not capable of handling mixed i1 and i8 loads and
stores. Sometimes with the previous code this would work by luck, but
usually it would crash, so I'm not terribly worried. I'll watch the LNT
numbers just to be sure.

llvm-svn: 169719

llvm-svn: 169712

- added function to VectorTargetTransformInfo to query cost of intrinsics
- vectorize trivially vectorizable intrinsic calls such as sin, cos, log, etc.

Reviewed by: Nadav

llvm-svn: 169711

llvm-svn: 169710

llvm-svn: 169709

No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 169703

llvm-svn: 169701

This will more closely match the behavior of the new PtrUseVisitor that
I am adding. Hopefully this will not change the actual behavior in any
way, but by making the processing order more similar help in debugging.

llvm-svn: 169697

llvm-svn: 169692

- fix a bug which cause sigfault.
- add two testing cases which was causing crash

llvm-svn: 169687

Teach DAG combine to handle vector logical operations with vectors of all 1s or all 0s. These cases can show up when vectors are split for legalizing. Fix some tests that were dependent on these cases not being combined.

llvm-svn: 169684

There are still bugs in this pass, as well as other issues that are
being worked on, but the bugs are crashers that occur pretty easily in
the wild. Test cases have been sent to the original commit's review
thread.

This reverts the commits:
  r169671: Fix a logic error.
  r169604: Move the popcnt tests to an X86 subdirectory.
  r168931: Initial commit adding the pass.

llvm-svn: 169683

llvm-svn: 169676

llvm-svn: 169671

std::string to a StringRef. Moreover, the method being called accepts
a Twine to simplify these patterns.

Fixes this ASan failure:
==6312== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x7fd558b1af58 at pc 0xcb7529 bp 0x7fffff572080 sp 0x7fffff572078
READ of size 1 at 0x7fd558b1af58 thread T0
    #0 0xcb7528 .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:192 llvm::StringRef::operator[]()
    #1 0x1d53c0a .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h:128 llvm::HashString()
    #2 0x1d53878 .../llvm/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp:64 llvm::StringMapImpl::LookupBucketFor()
    #3 0x1b6872f .../llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:352 llvm::StringMap<>::GetOrCreateValue<>()
    #4 0x1b61836 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCContext.cpp:109 llvm::MCContext::GetOrCreateSymbol()
    #5 0xe9fd47 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:154 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitMappingSymbol()
    #6 0xea01dd .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:133 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitDataMappingSymbol()
    #7 0xe9f78b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:91 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitBytes()
    #8 0x1b15d82 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp:89 llvm::MCStreamer::EmitIntValue()
    #9 0xcc0f9b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:713 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes()
    #10 0xcc0d44 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:632 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::EmitStartOfAsmFile()
    #11 0x14692ad .../llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:162 llvm::AsmPrinter::doInitialization()
    #12 0x1bc4677 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1561 llvm::FPPassManager::doInitialization()
    #13 0x1bc4990 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1595 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule()
    #14 0x1bc55e5 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1705 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run()
    #15 0x1bc5878 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1740 llvm::PassManager::run()
    #16 0xc3954d .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:378 compileModule()
    #17 0xc38001 .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:194 main
    #18 0x7fd557d6a11c __libc_start_main
0x7fd558b1af58 is located 24 bytes inside of 29-byte region [0x7fd558b1af40,0x7fd558b1af5d)
freed by thread T0 here:
    #0 0xc337da .../llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:56 operator delete()
    #1 0x1ee9cef .../libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:535 std::string::~string()
    #2 0xea01dd .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:133 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitDataMappingSymbol()
    #3 0xe9f78b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/MCTargetDesc/ARMELFStreamer.cpp:91 (anonymous namespace)::ARMELFStreamer::EmitBytes()
    #4 0x1b15d82 .../llvm/lib/MC/MCStreamer.cpp:89 llvm::MCStreamer::EmitIntValue()
    #5 0xcc0f9b .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:713 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::emitAttributes()
    #6 0xcc0d44 .../llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp:632 llvm::ARMAsmPrinter::EmitStartOfAsmFile()
    #7 0x14692ad .../llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp:162 llvm::AsmPrinter::doInitialization()
    #8 0x1bc4677 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1561 llvm::FPPassManager::doInitialization()
    #9 0x1bc4990 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1595 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule()
    #10 0x1bc55e5 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1705 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run()
    #11 0x1bc5878 .../llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1740 llvm::PassManager::run()
    #12 0xc3954d .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:378 compileModule()
    #13 0xc38001 .../llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:194 main
    #14 0x7fd557d6a11c __libc_start_main

llvm-svn: 169668

It was a nasty oversight that we didn't include this when we added this
API in the first place. Blech.

rdar://12839439

llvm-svn: 169653

llvm-svn: 169651

SmallString. This makes it possible to use the length-erased SmallVectorImpl
in the interface without imposing buffer size. Thus, the size of MCInstFragment
is back down since a preallocated 8-byte contents buffer is enough.

It would be generally a good idea to rid all the fragments of SmallString as
contents, because a vector just makes more sense.

llvm-svn: 169644

the VSRI instruction before it since it does not affect the MSB.

Thanks Craig Topper for suggesting this.

llvm-svn: 169638

In particular, check if MachineBasicBlock::iterator is end() before
using it to call getDebugLoc();

See also this thread on llvm-commits:
   http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121112/155914.html

llvm-svn: 169634

which removes code duplication and prepares the ground for future additions.

Full discussion:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158233.html

llvm-svn: 169626

llvm-svn: 169624

Also fixes a test that was overly-sensitive to the exact order of statistics
emitted.

llvm-svn: 169619

delegated to MCObjectStreamer.

llvm-svn: 169617

duplicate implementations in format-specific streamers.

llvm-svn: 169613

Before this patch, when you objdump an LLVM-compiled file, objdump tried to
decode data-in-code sections as if they were code.  This patch adds the missing
Mapping Symbols, as defined by "ELF for the ARM Architecture" (ARM IHI 0044D).

Patch based on work by Greg Fitzgerald.

llvm-svn: 169609

llvm-svn: 169603