- Jul 15, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
This code runs after clearOutputSections. llvm-svn: 308066
-
- Jul 14, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 308057
-
Rafael Espindola authored
NFC, just makes the OutputSectionCommand available. llvm-svn: 308056
-
- Jul 06, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 307211
-
- Jul 05, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
Attempt to fix Windows buildbots From 307131 Replaced return {ET, false}; with return std::make_pair(ET, false); llvm-svn: 307137
-
Peter Smith authored
This change permits there to be more than one thunk to be associated with a symbol. For interworking thunks we only require one thunk, but range extension thunks may require more than one. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34037 llvm-svn: 307136
-
Peter Smith authored
On ARM the interworking thunks are only produced for branch instructions that can't be changed into a blx instruction so only Thumb callers would call Thumb thunks and only ARM callers would call ARM thunks. With range extension thunks branch and link instructions may need a Thunk. These instructions can be rewritten as a blx and can use either ARM or Thumb thunks. We introduce an isCompatibleWith() function so that a caller can check if an existing Thunk is compatible before reusing it. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34035 llvm-svn: 307132
-
- Jul 04, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
Before we would sometimes not mention that the relocation was in a ro area before. llvm-svn: 307089
-
- Jun 26, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
On many architectures gcc and clang will recognize _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - . and produce a relocation that can be processed without needing to know the value of _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. This is not always the case; for example ARM gcc produces R_ARM_BASE_PREL but clang produces the more general R_ARM_REL32 to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. To evaluate this relocation correctly _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ must be defined to be the either the base of the GOT or end of the GOT dependent on architecture.. If/when llvm-mc is changed to recognize _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - . this change will not be necessary for new objects. However there may still be old objects and versions of clang. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34355 llvm-svn: 306282
-
- Jun 16, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
In preparation for supporting range extension thunks we now continually call createThunks() until no more thunks are added. This requires us to record the thunks we add on each pass and only merge the new ones into the OutputSection. We also need to check if a Relocation is targeting a thunk to prevent us from infinitely creating more thunks. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34034 llvm-svn: 305555
-
- Jun 08, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
This allows moving clearOutputSections a bit earlier. llvm-svn: 304947
-
- Jun 07, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
Thunks are now generated per InputSectionDescription instead of per OutputSection. This allows created ThunkSections to be inserted directly into InputSectionDescription. Changes in this patch: - Loop over InputSectionDescriptions to find relocations to Thunks - Generate a ThunkSection per InputSectionDescription - Remove synchronize() as we no longer need it - Move fabricateDefaultCommands() before createThunks Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33835 llvm-svn: 304887
-
- Jun 06, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
In preparation for inserting Thunks into InputSectionDescription::Sections extract the loop that finds InputSections that may have calls that need Thunks. This isn't much benefit now but this will be useful when we have to extract the InputSectionDescriptions::Sections from the script. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33834 llvm-svn: 304783
-
Peter Smith authored
In preparation for inserting Thunks into InputSectionDescriptions this simple change associates added Thunks with a vector of InputSections instead of an OutputSection. As of now we are just using OutputSection::Sections. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33832 llvm-svn: 304782
-
- Jun 01, 2017
-
-
George Rimar authored
This is PR33243. R_GOTONLY_PC_FROM_END was not in a list of link time constant expressions and that was a result of confusiing messages like PR shows: /usr/bin/ld.lld: error: /usr/lib/go/src/runtime/alg.go:47: can't create dynamic relocation R_386_GOTPC against local symbol in readonly segment defined in /tmp/nice/go-link-597453838/go.o Though in reality we just should not have try to create a dynamic relocation for this case at all. Patch fixes the issue. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33717 llvm-svn: 304393
-
- May 31, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
Before InputSectionBase had an OutputSection pointer, but that was not always valid. For example, if it was a merge section one actually had to look at MergeSec->OutSec. This was brittle and caused bugs like the one fixed by r304260. We now have a single Parent pointer that points to an OutputSection for InputSection, but to a SyntheticSection for merge sections and .eh_frame. This makes it impossible to accidentally access an invalid OutSec. llvm-svn: 304338
-
- May 18, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
GetSection is a template because write calls relocate. relocate has two parts. The non alloc code really has to be a template, as it is looking a raw input file data. The alloc part is only a template because of getSize. This patch folds the value of getSize early, detemplates getRelocTargetVA and splits relocate into a templated non alloc case and a regular function for the alloc case. This has the nice advantage of making sure we collect all the information we need for relocations before getting to InputSection::relocateNonAlloc. Since we know got is alloc, it can just call the function directly and avoid the template. llvm-svn: 303355
-
- May 17, 2017
-
-
George Rimar authored
Nothing special here, just detemplates code that became possible to detemplate after recent commits in a straghtforward way. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33234 llvm-svn: 303237
-
- May 12, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
This is a bit hackish, but allows for a lot of followup cleanups. llvm-svn: 302845
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 302832
-
- May 11, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 302828
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 302826
-
- May 05, 2017
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
This feels a bit hackish, but I think it is still an improvement. The way a tls address is computed in the various architectures is not that different. For example, for local dynamic we need the base of the tls (R_TLSLD or R_TLSLD_PC), and the offset of that particular symbol (R_ABS). Given the similarity, we can just use the expressions instead of having two additional target hooks. llvm-svn: 302279
-
- May 03, 2017
-
-
Rui Ueyama authored
It seems virtually everyone who tries to do LTO build with Clang and LLD was hit by a mistake to forget using llvm-ar command to create archive files. I wasn't an exception. Since this is an annoying common issue, it is probably better to handle that gracefully rather than reporting an error and tell the user to redo build with different configuration. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32721 llvm-svn: 302083
-
- Apr 13, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
Replace addModuleReloc with AddTlsReloc so that we can use it for both the module relocation and the offset relocation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31751 llvm-svn: 300192
-
- Apr 08, 2017
-
-
George Rimar authored
Previously we silently produced broken output for R_386_GOT32X/R_386_GOT32 relocations if they were used to compute the address of the symbol’s global offset table entry without base register when position-independent code is disabled. Situation happened because of recent ABI changes. Released ABI mentions that R_386_GOT32X can be calculated in a two different ways (so we did not follow ABI here before this patch), but draft ABI also mentions R_386_GOT32 relocation here. We should use the same calculations for both relocations. Problem is that we always calculated them as G + A - GOT (offset from end of GOT), but for case when PIC is disabled, according to i386 ABI calculation should be G + A, what should produce just an address in GOT finally. ABI: https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki/intel386-psABI-draft.pdf (p36, p60). llvm-svn: 299812
-
- Apr 07, 2017
-
-
Simon Atanasyan authored
[ELF] Do not pass GOT section as an argument to handleARMTlsRelocation and handleMipsTlsRelocation functions. NFC Both functions always use the same GOT sections In<ELFT>::Got and In<ELFT>::MipsGot respectively, so we do not need to pass them as an argument. llvm-svn: 299773
-
Peter Smith authored
When the target of the TlsOffsetRel is non-preemptible we can write the offset directly into the GOT without needing a dynamic relocation. This is optional for dynamically linked executables but is required for static linking. This change adds the relocation to the GOT entry and a test case for non-0 offsets so that if we miss out the offset the test won't spuriously pass by virtue of the default value being 0. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31749 llvm-svn: 299751
-
Peter Smith authored
The handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation handled both ARM and Mips as at a high-level the actions of what to do when encountering a local dynamic or global dynamic TLS relocation are the same. However due to Mips using a custom GOT the differences of the implementation are enough that the function became difficult to understand. This change replaces handleNotRelaxTlsRelocation into handleARMTlsRelocation() and handleMipsTlsRelocation() so that the ARM and Mips specific code is isolated. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31748 llvm-svn: 299750
-
Rui Ueyama authored
This patch addresses a post-commit review comment for r299615. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31792 llvm-svn: 299722
-
- Apr 06, 2017
-
-
Rui Ueyama authored
scanRelocs() does a lot of things. It fills InputSection's Relocations vector, making a decision whether a TLS relocation should be relaxed or not, and making a decision whether a GOT/PLT slot needs to be created or not. They don't actually have to be done in a single loop. I want to separate them so that some of them can be run concurently. As a first step, this patch moves PLT/GOT slot assignment to beginning of the loop, so that they just fall through to the next statements. This should make it clear that that code doesn't affect other parts of the loop. llvm-svn: 299615
-
Rui Ueyama authored
Relocations are abstracted as platform-independent R_TLS_* relocations, so we don't need to check platform-specific ones to see if a relocation is TLS GD. llvm-svn: 299614
-
- Apr 05, 2017
-
-
Peter Smith authored
For range extension thunks we will need to repeatedly call createThunks() until no more thunks are created. We will need to retain the state of Thunks that we have created so far to avoid recreating them on later passes. This change does not change the functionality of createThunks(). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31654 llvm-svn: 299530
-
- Apr 03, 2017
-
-
Rui Ueyama authored
Previous error message style: error: /home/alice/src/bar.c:12: relocation R_X86_64_PLT32 cannot refer to absolute symbol 'answer' defined in /home/alice/src/foo.o New error message style: error: relocation R_X86_64_PLT32 cannot refer to absolute symbol: foo >>> defined in /home/alice/src/foo.o >>> referenced by bar.c:12 (/home/alice/src/bar.c:12) >>> /home/alice/src/bar.o:(.text+0x1) llvm-svn: 299390
-
- Mar 31, 2017
-
-
James Henderson authored
llvm-svn: 299208
-
- Mar 30, 2017
-
-
Rui Ueyama authored
This change is to improve consistency with other files. llvm-svn: 299110
-
Rui Ueyama authored
Previously, undefined symbol errors are one line like this and wasn't easy to read. /ssd/clang/bin/ld.lld: error: /ssd/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Writer.cpp:207: undefined symbol 'lld::elf::EhFrameSection<llvm::object::ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0, true> >::addSection(lld::elf::InputSectionBase*)' This patch make it more structured like this. bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: lld::elf::EhFrameSection<llvm::object::ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0, true> >>> Referenced by Writer.cpp:207 (/ssd/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Writer.cpp:207) >>> Writer.cpp.o in archive lib/liblldELF.a Discussion thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-March/111459.html Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31481 llvm-svn: 299097
-
- Mar 29, 2017
-
-
Rui Ueyama authored
This reverts commit because this really shouldn't happen unless there's a bug in LLD. llvm-svn: 299021
-
Rui Ueyama authored
uint64_t is simpler and less error-prone than target or host-dependent types. llvm-svn: 298969
-
Rui Ueyama authored
If a function takes a size and an alignment, we usually pass them in that order instead of the reverse order. llvm-svn: 298968
-