The inalloca parameter has to be the only parameter passed in memory.
Changing the convention to fastcc can break that.

At some point we should teach global opt how to optimize ABI attributes
like inalloca and maybe byval. These attributes are mainly used to match
C ABIs. They are harder for LLVM to optimize and they don't always
generate the best code.

Fixes PR38487

llvm-svn: 339360

Similar to rL337966 - if the DAGCombiner's rotate matching was 
working as expected, I don't think we'd see any test diffs here.

AArch only goes right, and PPC only goes left. 
x86 has both, so no diffs there.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50091

llvm-svn: 339359

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49979

llvm-svn: 339358

Summary: This change provides a common optimization path for both Unsafe and FMF driven optimization for this fsub fold adding reassociation, as it the flag that most closely represents the translation

Reviewers: spatel, wristow, arsenm

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: wdng

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50195

llvm-svn: 339357

Add new feature, `FeatureUseWideStrideVFP`, that replaces the need for a
processor check.  Otherwise, NFC.

llvm-svn: 339354

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50454

llvm-svn: 339340

Exposed by D50328

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50328

llvm-svn: 339337

As discussed on D41794, we have many cases where we fail to combine shuffles as the input operands have other uses.

This patch permits these shuffles to be combined as long as they don't introduce additional variable shuffle masks, which should reduce instruction dependencies and allow the total number of shuffles to still drop without increasing the constant pool.

However, this may mean that some memory folds may no longer occur, and on pre-AVX require the occasional extra register move.

This also exposes some poor PMULDQ/PMULUDQ codegen which was doing unnecessary upper/lower calculations which will in fact fold to zero/undef - the fix will be added in a followup commit.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50328

llvm-svn: 339335

According to PTX ISA .volatile has the same memory synchronization
semantics as .relaxed.sys, so it can be used to implement monotonic
atomic loads and stores. This is important for OpenMP's atomic
construct where
 - 'read's and 'write's are lowered to atomic loads and stores, and
 - an update of float or double types are lowered into a cmpxchg loop.
(Note that PTX could do better because it has atom.add.f{32,64} but
LLVM's atomicrmw instruction only allows integer types.)

Higher levels of atomicity (like acquire and release) need additional
synchronization properties which were added with PTX ISA 6.0 / sm_70.
So using these instructions still results in an error.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50391

llvm-svn: 339316

This pseudo-instruction is similar to la but uses PC-relative addressing
unconditionally. This is, la is only different to lla when using -fPIC. This
pseudo-instruction seems often forgotten in several specs but it is definitely
mentioned in binutils opcodes/riscv-opc.c. The semantics are defined both in
page 37 of the "RISC-V Reader" book but also in function macro found in
gas/config/tc-riscv.c.

This is a very first step towards adding PIC support for Linux in the RISC-V
backend.

The lla pseudo-instruction expands to a sequence of auipc + addi with a couple
of pc-rel relocations where the second points to the first one. This is
described in
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#pc-relative-symbol-addresses

For now, this patch only introduces support of that pseudo instruction at the
assembler parser.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49661

llvm-svn: 339314

The main interesting case is a fence in an otherwise dead loop or one containing only arithmetic.  This can happen as a result of DSE or other transforms from seemingly reasonable initial IR.  

llvm-svn: 339310

Changes the default Windows target triple returned by
GetHostTriple.cmake from the old environment names (which we wanted to
move away from) to newer, normalized ones. This also requires updating
all tests to use the new systems names in constraints.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47381

llvm-svn: 339307

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50466

llvm-svn: 339302

llvm-svn: 339300

isNegatibleForFree() should not matter here (as the test diffs show)
because it's always a win to replace an fsub+fadd with fneg. The
problem in D50195 persists because either (1) we are doing these
folds in the wrong order or (2) we're missing another fold for fadd.

llvm-svn: 339299

LLVM triple normalization is handling "unknown" and empty components
differently; for example given "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" and
"x86_64-linux-gnu" which should be equivalent, triple normalization
returns "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" and "x86_64--linux-gnu". autoconf's
config.sub returns "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" for both
"x86_64-linux-gnu" and "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu". This changes the
triple normalization to behave the same way, replacing empty triple
components with "unknown".

This addresses PR37129.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50219

llvm-svn: 339294

These are related to the block of code under review in D50195.

llvm-svn: 339293

On Darwin we pin the DWARF line tables to version 2. Stop doing so for
DWARF v5 and later.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49381

llvm-svn: 339288

Normally, if any registers are spilled, we prefer to spill lr on Thumb1
so we can fold the "bx lr" into the "pop".  However, if there are tail
calls involved, restoring lr is expensive, so skip the optimization in
that case.

The spill of r7 in the new test also isn't necessary, but that's
mostly orthogonal to this patch. (It's the same code in
ARMFrameLowering, but it's not related to tail calls.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49459

llvm-svn: 339283

llvm-svn: 339276

Template manglings use a fresh back-referencing context, so we
need to do the same.  This fixes several existing tests which are
marked as FIXME, so those are now actually run.

llvm-svn: 339275

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50405

llvm-svn: 339272

I think this is the only situation where the callsite
will have a null instruction.

llvm-svn: 339271

llvm-svn: 339270

When reading a custom WASM section, it was possible that its name
extended beyond the size of the section. This resulted in a bogus value
for the section size due to the size overflowing.

Fixes heap buffer overflow detected by OSS-fuzz:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=8190

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50387

llvm-svn: 339269

When using APPLE extensions, don't duplicate the compiler invocation's
flags both in AT_producer and AT_APPLE_flags.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50453

llvm-svn: 339268

This is a sibling to the simplify from:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339174

llvm-svn: 339267

This is a sibling to the simplify from:
rL339171

llvm-svn: 339266

The scalar cases are handled in instcombine's internal
reassociation pass for FP ops, but it misses the vector types.

These patterns are similar to what was handled in InstSimplify in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339171
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339174
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339176
...but we can't use instsimplify on these because we require negation
of the original operand.

llvm-svn: 339263

This patch aims to improve the codegen for vector loads involving the
scalar_to_vector (load X) sequence. Initially, ld->mv instructions were used
for scalar_to_vector (load X), so this patch allows scalar_to_vector (load X)
to utilize:

LXSD and LXSDX for i64 and f64
LXSIWAX for i32 (sign extension to i64)
LXSIWZX for i32 and f64

Committing on behalf of Amy Kwan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48950

llvm-svn: 339260

Summary:
Currently, in line with GCC, when specifying reserved registers like sp or pc on an inline asm() clobber list, we don't always preserve the original value across the statement. And in general, overwriting reserved registers can have surprising results.

For example:


```
extern int bar(int[]);

int foo(int i) {
  int a[i]; // VLA
  asm volatile(
      "mov r7, #1"
    :
    :
    : "r7"
  );

  return 1 + bar(a);
}
```

Compiled for thumb, this gives:
```
$ clang --target=arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv7a -c test.c -o - -S -O1 -mthumb
...
foo:
        .fnstart
@ %bb.0:                                @ %entry
        .save   {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
        push    {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
        .setfp  r7, sp, #12
        add     r7, sp, #12
        .pad    #4
        sub     sp, #4
        movs    r1, #7
        add.w   r0, r1, r0, lsl #2
        bic     r0, r0, #7
        sub.w   r0, sp, r0
        mov     sp, r0
        @APP
        mov.w   r7, #1
        @NO_APP
        bl      bar
        adds    r0, #1
        sub.w   r4, r7, #12
        mov     sp, r4
        pop     {r4, r5, r6, r7, pc}
...
```

r7 is used as the frame pointer for thumb targets, and this function needs to restore the SP from the FP because of the variable-length stack allocation a. r7 is clobbered by the inline assembly (and r7 is included in the clobber list), but LLVM does not preserve the value of the frame pointer across the assembly block.

This type of behavior is similar to GCC's and has been discussed on the bugtracker: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11807 . No consensus seemed to have been reached on the way forward.  Clang behavior has briefly been discussed on the CFE mailing (starting here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058392.html). I've opted for following Eli Friedman's advice to print warnings when there are reserved registers on the clobber list so as not to diverge from GCC behavior for now.

The patch uses MachineRegisterInfo's target-specific knowledge of reserved registers, just before we convert the inline asm string in the AsmPrinter.

If we find a reserved register, we print a warning:
```
repro.c:6:7: warning: inline asm clobber list contains reserved registers: R7 [-Winline-asm]
      "mov r7, #1"
      ^
```

Reviewers: eli.friedman, olista01, javed.absar, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: efriedma, eraman, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49727

llvm-svn: 339257

Further improve compatibility with the GNU assembler.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50217
Patch by Kito Cheng.

llvm-svn: 339255

Provide a pass-through of the numerator for divide by one cases - this is the same approach we take in DAGCombiner::visitSDIVLike.

I investigated whether we could achieve this by magic MULHU/SRL values but nothing appeared to work as we don't have a way for MULHU(x,c) -> x

llvm-svn: 339254

[RISCV] Add InstAlias definitions for add[w], and, xor, or, sll[w], srl[w], sra[w], slt and sltu with immediate

Match the GNU assembler in supporting immediate operands for these 
instructions even when the reg-reg mnemonic is used.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50046
Patch by Kito Cheng.

llvm-svn: 339252

llvm-svn: 339251

This accounts for the missing IR fold noted in D50195. We don't need any fast-math to enable the negation transform. 
FP negation can always be folded into an fmul/fdiv constant to eliminate the fneg.

I've limited this to one-use to ensure that we are eliminating an instruction rather than replacing fneg by a 
potentially expensive fdiv or fmul.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50417

llvm-svn: 339248

Making the test use urem relies on it calling udiv-like combines, but the real issue is with the udiv so we're better off using that directly.

llvm-svn: 339247

Summary:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/IT3

Comes up in the [most ugliest]  `signed int` -> `signed char`  case of
`-fsanitize=implicit-conversion` (https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250)
Previously, we were stuck with `not`: {F6867736}
But now we are able to completely get rid of it: {F6867737}
(FIXME: why are we loosing the metadata? that seems wrong/strange.)

Here, we only want to do that it we will be able to completely
get rid of that 'not'.

Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: vsk, erichkeane, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50301

llvm-svn: 339243

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50427

llvm-svn: 339241

This adds codegen support for the vmov_n_f16 and vdup_n_f16 variants.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50329

llvm-svn: 339238