This patch adds a new TTI hook to allow targets to tell LSR that
a chain including some instruction is already profitable and
should not be optimized. This patch also adds an implementation
of this TTI hook for ARM so LSR doesn't optimize chains that include
the VCTP intrinsic.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79418

This was reverted because of a miscompilation. At closer inspection, the
problem was actually visible in a changed llvm regression test too. This
one-line follow up fix/recommit will splat the IV, which is what we are trying
to avoid if unnecessary in general, if tail-folding is requested even if all
users are scalar instructions after vectorisation. Because with tail-folding,
the splat IV will be used by the predicate of the masked loads/stores
instructions. The previous version omitted this, which caused the
miscompilation. The original commit message was:

If tail-folding of the scalar remainder loop is applied, the primary induction
variable is splat to a vector and used by the masked load/store vector
instructions, thus the IV does not remain scalar. Because we now mark
that the IV does not remain scalar for these cases, we don't emit the vector IV
if it is not used. Thus, the vectoriser produces less dead code.

Thanks to Ayal Zaks for the direction how to fix this.

This is a reimplementation of the `orderNodes` function, as the old
implementation didn't take into account all cases.

Fix PR41509

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79037

Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular
edge and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for
all outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over
it is difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0
because there is no easy way to know when the user finished
setting all the probabilities.

Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396

Fixes PR41696

The loop-reroll pass generates an invalid IR (or its assertion
fails in debug build) if values of the base instruction and
other root instructions (terms used in the loop-reroll pass)
are used outside the loop block. See IRs written in PR41696
as examples.

The current implementation of the loop-reroll pass can reroll
only loops that don't have values that are used outside the
loop, except reduced values (the last values of reduction chains).
This is described in the comment of the `LoopReroll::reroll`
function.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-10.0.0/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRerollPass.cpp#L1600

This is checked in the `LoopReroll::DAGRootTracker::validate`
function.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-10.0.0/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRerollPass.cpp#L1393

However, the base instruction and other root instructions skip
this check in the validation loop.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-10.0.0/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopRerollPass.cpp#L1229

Moving the check in front of the skip is the logically simplest
fix. However, inserting the check in an earlier stage is better
in terms of compilation time of unrerollable loops. This fix
inserts the check for the base instruction into the function
to validate possible base/root instructions. Check for other
root instructions is unnecessary because they don't match any
base instructions if they have uses outside the loop.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79549

For AAReturnedValues we treated new and existing information differently
in the updateImpl. Only the latter was properly analyzed and
categorized. The former was thought to be analyzed in the subsequent
update. Since the Attributor does not support "self-updates" we need to
make sure the state is "stable" after each updateImpl invocation. That
is, if the surrounding information does not change, the state is valid.
Now we make sure all return values have been handled and properly
categorized each iteration. We might not update again if we have not
requested a non-fix attribute so we cannot "wait" for the next update to
analyze a new return value.

Bug reported by @sdmitriev.

We want to add a way to avoid merging identical calls so as to keep the
separate debug-information for those calls. There is also an asan
usecase where having this attribute would be beneficial to avoid
alternative work-arounds.

Here is the link to the feature request:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42783.

`nomerge` is different from `noline`. `noinline` prevents function from
inlining at callsites, but `nomerge` prevents multiple identical calls
from being merged into one.

This patch adds `nomerge` to disable the optimization in IR level. A
followup patch will be needed to let backend understands `nomerge` and
avoid tail merge at backend.

Reviewed By: asbirlea, rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78659

Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, uenoku, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79801

Summary:
This patch makes propagatesPoison be more accurate by returning true on
more bin ops/unary ops/casts/etc.

The changed test in ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll was introduced by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008 .
IIUC, the goal of the tests is to show that iv.inc's SCEV expression still has
no-overflow flags even if the loop isn't in the wanted form.
It becomes more accurate with this patch, so think this is okay.

Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, sanjoy

Reviewed By: spatel, nikic

Subscribers: regehr, nlopes, efriedma, fhahn, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78615

gcov 4.8 (r189778) moved the exit block from the last to the second.
The .gcda format is compatible with 4.7 but

* decoding libgcov 4.7 produced .gcda with gcov [4.7,8) can mistake the
  exit block, emit bogus `%s:'%s' has arcs from exit block\n` warnings,
  and print wrong `" returned %s` for branch statistics (-b).
* decoding libgcov 4.8 produced .gcda with gcov 4.7 has similar issues.

Also, rename "return block" to "exit block" because the latter is the
appropriate term.

We will now ensure ensure the return type of called function is the type
of all call sites we are going to rewrite. This avoids a problem
partially fixed by D79680. The part that was not covered is a use of
this "weird" casted call site (see `@func3` in `misc_crash.ll`).

misc_crash.ll checks are auto-generated now.

We should never give up on AAIsDead as it guards other AAs from
unreachable code (in which SSA properties are meaningless). We did
however use required dependences on some queries in AAIsDead which
caused us to invalidate AAIsDead if the queried AA got invalidated.
We now use optional dependences instead. The bug that exposed this is
added to the liveness.ll test and other test changes show the impact.

Bug report by @sdmitriev.

During an update of AAIsDead, new instructions become live. If we query
information from them, the result is often just the initial state, e.g.,
for call site `noreturn` and `nounwind`. We will now trigger an update
for cached attributes during the AAIsDead update, though other AAs might
later use the same API.

Follow-up to D79452.
Mimics the extra use cost formula for the inverse transform with extracts.

Summary: Factoring out in preparation to https://reviews.llvm.org/D79042

Reviewers: dblaikie, davidxl

Subscribers: mgorny, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79613

Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku

Reviewed By: uenoku

Subscribers: hiraditya, uenoku, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79680

Summary:
this patch fixe crash/asserts found in the test-suite.
the AssumeptionCache cannot be assumed to have all assumes contrary to what i tought.
prevent generation of information for terminators, because this can create broken IR in transfromation where we insert the new terminator before removing the old one.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79458

don't span their entire scope.

The previous commit (6d1c40c1) is an older version of the test.

Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79573

Summary:
In D65848 the function getFuncNameInModule was refactored to no longer use module.
This diff removes the parameter and rename the function name to avoid confusion.

Reviewers: wenlei, wmi, davidxl

Reviewed By: wenlei

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79310

The old QuerriedAAs contained two vectors, one for required one for
optional dependences (=queries). We now use a single vector and encode
the kind directly in the pointer.

This reduces memory consumption and makes the connection between
abstract attributes and their dependences clearer.

No functional change is intended, changes in the test are due to
different order in the query map. Neither the order before nor now is in
any way special.

---

Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):

Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 543734 (329735/s)
temporary memory allocations: 105895 (64217/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 19.19MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 102.26MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```

After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 513292 (341511/s)
temporary memory allocations: 106028 (70544/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 13.35MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 95.64MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```

Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: -30442 (208506/s)
temporary memory allocations: 133 (-910/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -5.84MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```

---

Reviewed By: uenoku

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78729

When we have an existing `argmemonly` or `inaccessiblememorargmemonly`
we used to "know" that information. However, interprocedural constant
propagation can invalidate these attributes. We now ignore and remove
these attributes for internal functions (which may be affected by IP
constant propagation), if we are deriving new attributes for the
function.

As we replace values with constants interprocedurally, we also need to
do this "look-through" step during the generic value traversal or we
would derive properties from replaced values. While this is often not
problematic, it is when we use the "kind" of a value for reasoning,
e.g., accesses to arguments allow `argmemonly`.

When we categorize a pointer value we bailed at `null` before. If we
know `null` is not a valid memory location we can ignore it as there
won't be an access at all.

We now use getPointerDereferenceableBytes to determine `nonnull` and
`dereferenceable` facts from the IR. We also use getPointerAlignment in
AAAlign for the same reason. The latter can interfere with callbacks so
we do restrict it to non-function-pointers for now.

Defaulting to -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' makes .gcno/.gcda
compatible with gcov [4.7,8)

In addition, delete clang::CodeGenOptionsBase::CoverageExtraChecksum and GCOVOptions::UseCfgChecksum.
We can infer the information from the version.

With this change, .gcda files produced by `clang --coverage a.o` linked executable can be read by gcov 4.7~7.
We don't need other -Xclang -coverage* options.
There may be a mismatching version warning, though.

(Note, GCC r173147 "split checksum into cfg checksum and line checksum"
 made gcov 4.7 incompatible with previous versions.)

rL144865 incorrectly wrote function names for GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION
(this might be part of the reasons the header says
"We emit files in a corrupt version of GCOV's "gcda" file format").

rL176173 and rL177475 realized the problem and introduced -coverage-no-function-names-in-data
to work around the issue. (However, the description is wrong.
libgcov never writes function names, even before GCC 4.2).

In reality, the linker command line has to look like:

clang --coverage -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' -Xclang -coverage-cfg-checksum -Xclang -coverage-no-function-names-in-data

Failing to pass -coverage-no-function-names-in-data can make gcov 4.7~7
either produce wrong results (for one gcov-4.9 program, I see "No executable lines")
or segfault (gcov-7).
(gcov-8 uses an incompatible format.)

This patch deletes -coverage-no-function-names-in-data and the related
function names support from libclang_rt.profile

Summary:
The assume builder was non-deterministic when working on unamed values.
this patch fixes this.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, mgrang, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78616

Summary: with this patch the assume salvageKnowledge will not generate assume if all knowledge is already available in an assume with valid context. assume bulider can also in some cases update an existing assume with better information.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78014

Currently LAA's uses of ScalarEvolutionExpander blocks moving the
expander from Analysis to Transforms. Conceptually the expander does not
fit into Analysis (it is only used for code generation) and
runtime-check generation also seems to be better suited as a
transformation utility.

Reviewers: Ayal, anemet

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78460

We have a transform in the opposite direction only for the x86 MMX type,
Other types are not handled either way before this patch.

The motivating case from PR45748:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
...is the last test diff. In that example, we are triggering an existing
bitcast transform, so we reduce the number of casts, and that should give
us the ideal x86 codegen.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79171

Fold or(zext(bitreverse(x)),shl(zext(bitreverse(y)),bw/2) -> bitreverse(or(zext(x),shl(zext(y),bw/2))

Practically this is the same as the BSWAP pattern so we might as well handle it.

The failing assertion has been fixed and the problematic test case has
been added.

This reverts the revert commit fc44617f.

This reverts commit c28114c8.

This causes some bots to fail:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/builds/30596/steps/build%20android%2Faarch64/logs/stdio

In order to reduce the API surface area (preparation for D78460), remove
a addRuntimeChecks() function and do the additional check in the single
caller.

Reviewers: Ayal, anemet

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79679

We can combine a floating-point extension cast with a conversion
from integer if we know the earlier cast is exact.

This is an optimization suggested in PR36617:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36617#c19

However, this patch does not change the example suggested there.
This patch only uses the existing analysis to handle cases where
the integer source value magnitude is narrower than the
intermediate FP mantissa (guarantees that the conversion to FP is
exact). Follow-up patches to the analysis function can enable
more cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79116

Summary: This was preventing MemorySanitizerLegacyPass from appearing in --print-after-all.

Reviewers: vitalybuka

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79661

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63616 added `-fsanitize-coverage-whitelist`
and `-fsanitize-coverage-blacklist` for clang.

However, it was done only for legacy pass manager.
This patch enable it for new pass manager as well.

Reviewed By: vitalybuka

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79653

Consider any constant memory type, not just global constants. AMDGPU
kernel parameters are effectively global constants, but appear as
either reads from an intrinsic derived pointer or function argument.